Legal weed should bring mellow to the masses, turn criminal profits to ash

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/columnists/Legal-weed-should-bring-mellow-to-the-masses-turn-criminal-profits-to-ash-369529061.html

As counterintuitive as it sounds, legal marijuana will probably result in some Canadians getting a lot less high.

In the 1980s, marijuana tended to be about three per cent tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, the plant’s primary psychoactive ingredient and the substance largely responsible for making marijuana users feel stoned.


These days, the average THC content of marijuana is more like 12 per cent, and samples seized by law-enforcement agencies have tested as high (sorry) as 24 per cent.

The increasing potency is a result of prohibition, which encouraged organized crime to reap huge profits from the production, distribution and sale of a product that used to be grown outdoors.

Now largely grown in clandestine indoor locations, weed tends to be cultivated with clinical precision. Over the decades, growers have figured out how to boost the THC content of marijuana to the point where what used to be a mellow, mood-altering drug is now a potent near-hallucinogen.

At the same time, those growers figured out how to reduce the content of another substance found within marijuana — cannabidiol, also known as CBD. This was done because CBD, which promotes relaxation and reduces stress, mitigates the mind-altering effects of THC.

This is why aging Baby Boomers aren’t waxing nostalgic when they claim the chill-out substance of their hippie youth now just makes them neurotic. Illegal weed is not just trippier, but also contains less of the ingredient that makes the trippy sensation tolerable.

Legalization, promised by the Trudeau Liberals, is bound to bring about quality controls and regulatory practices that will result in lower-THC and higher-CBD strains of marijuana on the market.

This is already starting to happen, as medical marijuana users have demonstrated a viable market for weed that’s less likely to make consumers agitated and paranoid. As well, in U.S. states where marijuana sales are legal — and in B.C. cities where illegal dispensaries have proliferated with impunity — recreational users have shown a taste for strains that induce less of a high.

In part, this is because marijuana users are no different from alcohol or caffeine users. Few people want to consume so much of a psychoactive substance that they wind up incapacitated, notwithstanding the weekend predilections of university students and professional athletes.

In Colorado, for example, visitors to legal marijuana dispensaries find themselves perusing the wares of what can best be described as apothecaries — less clinical than pharmacies, but not quite as tacky as head shops. "Budtenders" who consume the wares advise customers about the psychoactive effects of any given strain on offer.

This is a different service from that offered by staff at a liquor store, whose primary purpose is to advise customers about the way a bottle of wine tastes or how well it pairs with food.

This is why it’s concerning to note how Canadian medical-marijuana producers are jockeying to become legal weed distributors on a mail-order basis. Canada is in danger of creating conditions for the rise of Big Bud, which may wish to continue foisting high-test marijuana on the populace.

It’s also concerning to note both Manitoba and Ontario are mulling provincial control of marijuana retail sales. Late last year, Manitoba Premier Greg Selinger displayed how poorly he understood the future economic potential by declaring provincial employees won’t be smoking weed, which he described — inaccurately — as a dangerously addictive drug.

Marijuana can indeed be harmful, in the hands of kids. This is why it makes sense to have provincial regulators enforce age limits for purchasing weed and control the THC and CBD content.

But the only way to ensure Canada winds up with a variety of weed is to ensure there’s no impediment on the retail side. If legal weed is too expensive or too homogenous, the underground market will continue to thrive.

Nobody wants that. If you buy weed now, you’re likely supporting organized crime. Marijuana consumers who insist on purchasing fair-trade coffee and cruelty-free eggs probably don’t want to think about the fact their weed-purchasing practices may provide revenue for people who force underage girls into the sex trade.

This is part of the reason Canadian police are so eager to see the end of prohibition. Biker weed finances misery.

It’s also too strong. I personally look forward to lighting up on the day when weed is finally weak enough for me to handle — and doesn’t weigh on my conscience.
 

nobody important 666

Well-Known Member
Been reading that same song and dance for years. 2 big problems they never address is 1 back in the day weed was full of sticks and leaves which lowered the number (its not like a new form of plant magically appeared). 2 most weed doesn't come from organized crime, most come from a buddies basement. The garbage that joe blow on the street sells might, but most only use that until they actually meet more like minded people and then the real canabis culture open up to them.
 

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
kinda...drugs are decriminalized in portugal and that black market is flourishing. I dont know how far down the rabbit hole i can go with research but in CO,WA,OR patients look for blackmarket 1st due to price. From what ive seen and read, a gram in CO is roughly 20-30$ + 35% tax. Line up rec users. I sure do hope JT goes the route of funding schools and programs as CO did.

Saw a stat on CO and how much they have to pay back to citizens...could have sent every student to college/university for free. Help 100% of hungry and homeless it was quite a list.
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
makes me laugh when someone says black market will be eliminated.
It won't be eliminated completely, but it will become insignificant over time if prices are kept competitive and personal grows are allowed. Bootlegging, rum running and moonshine aren't an issue any more because booze is easily accessible. Like booze, I think weed will take time to become 'mainstream' among the un-informed much like booze with the prohibitionists.
 

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
It won't be eliminated completely, but it will become insignificant over time if prices are kept competitive and personal grows are allowed. Bootlegging, rum running and moonshine aren't an issue any more because booze is easily accessible. Like booze, I think weed will take time to become 'mainstream' among the un-informed much like booze with the prohibitionists.
You always offer good input, id look in the CO,WA,OR sub forums they talk about it a bit. The blackmarket didnt change, it got more expensive and the menu of items got longer.

Funny you brought up the moonshine, buddy about 2-3 months ago told me about a big operation he seen. Those are the "key chain" kinda guys lol so he says.
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
You always offer good input, id look in the CO,WA,OR sub forums they talk about it a bit. The blackmarket didnt change, it got more expensive and the menu of items got longer.

Funny you brought up the moonshine, buddy about 2-3 months ago told me about a big operation he seen. Those are the "key chain" kinda guys lol so he says.
I'm just hoping the government takes their own advice and keeps taxes to a minimum. The growers and retailers should be the ones to set the price in a free market and they need to undercut the BM to build their business. I know some legal states used huge taxes and money for schools as a selling point in the referendums, and now they are paying for it. Ours is a completely different situation. It is going to be made legal federally, we don't have to offer anything for votes. The provinces will set taxes like they do with booze.
You're right though, I should do some reading in the Co and WA threads.
 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
i think the taxes thing is a red herring. they are grasping at straws. i don't believe it will be any different that booze
 

kDude

Well-Known Member
almost like it was written by the LP's eh?
"we know can't grow properly, or very well at all.. so we'll just tell everyone that we're intentionally lowing the quality on purpose" ;)

if we can't grow our own though; nothing will change.
 

GroErr

Well-Known Member
Everybody's an expert on what will happen with legalization. As already mentioned here and other posts, over-regulation will simply keep the black market alive/thriving. I've seen doomsday predictions that somehow big pharma or Monsanto will eventually control seeds and in turn potency. I have this great little property in south Florida if anyone who believes that is interested... Grow your own, breed your own, stay off any government lists/program, been doing it for 30+ years, it works and I still don't give a rats ass whether it becomes legal, when, why, what rules...
 

Flagg420

Well-Known Member
I would like to see legal weed lead to harsher punishments on trafficking large quantities of real drugs...

And until that asshole kid shot up a theater in CO, they were doing fucking amazing on their statistics post-recreational cannabis... all violent crimes were down, across the board.... then he screwed the pooch and skewed that numbers :(
 
Top