LED vs H.I.D

secretmicrogrow420

Well-Known Member
Before I Begin I do not consider myself a expert, I am just a man with a Hobbie, a lot of people are always asking what is better H.I.D or LED ? so lets put this topic 2 rest!

If anything I say in this article is not correct please correct me dont light me up! Less gooooo

#GrowingStr8GasGang!

Okay, so let’s break this down:

High-end LED lights can achieve up to 220 lumens per watt, though not all models reach this level. Some advanced LEDs even exceed 3.5 µmol/J in efficiency, meaning they are more efficient at producing photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) for plant growth.

A high-end Double-Ended High-Pressure Sodium (HPS) light can produce up to 160 lumens per watt, with an efficiency of around 1.9 µmol/J. In comparison, Double-Ended Metal Halide (MH) typically maxes out at around 120 lumens per watt, with a similar efficiency of 1.9 µmol/J.

Ceramic Metal Halide (CMH) is generally more efficient than standard Metal Halide and can exceed 2.1 µmol/J in some cases. However, it maxes out at around 130 lumens per watt, depending on the wattage and model. So, while the lumen efficiency is typically lower than high-end HPS lights, it is still higher than that of standard MH bulbs.

Many growers report that High-Intensity Discharge (HID) lights penetrate deeper into the canopy than LEDs. This is likely due to the single-point intensity of HID bulbs, which focus light more intensely on a small area. In contrast, most LEDs distribute light more evenly across the canopy, which can reduce canopy penetration but provides more uniform coverage.

So, on paper, LEDs is KING of the hill ladies and gentleman —LED lights produce more visible light and emit more photons per second than traditional HID lights. However, the penetration depth of HID lights can still offer advantages in certain grow setups, particularly when lighting large areas or deep canopies.

#Str8GasGang
 
Before I Begin I do not consider myself a expert, I am just a man with a Hobbie, a lot of people are always asking what is better H.I.D or LED ? so lets put this topic 2 rest!

If anything I say in this article is not correct please correct me dont light me up! Less gooooo

#GrowingStr8GasGang!

Okay, so let’s break this down:

High-end LED lights can achieve up to 220 lumens per watt, though not all models reach this level. Some advanced LEDs even exceed 3.5 µmol/J in efficiency, meaning they are more efficient at producing photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) for plant growth.

A high-end Double-Ended High-Pressure Sodium (HPS) light can produce up to 160 lumens per watt, with an efficiency of around 1.9 µmol/J. In comparison, Double-Ended Metal Halide (MH) typically maxes out at around 120 lumens per watt, with a similar efficiency of 1.9 µmol/J.

Ceramic Metal Halide (CMH) is generally more efficient than standard Metal Halide and can exceed 2.1 µmol/J in some cases. However, it maxes out at around 130 lumens per watt, depending on the wattage and model. So, while the lumen efficiency is typically lower than high-end HPS lights, it is still higher than that of standard MH bulbs.

Many growers report that High-Intensity Discharge (HID) lights penetrate deeper into the canopy than LEDs. This is likely due to the single-point intensity of HID bulbs, which focus light more intensely on a small area. In contrast, most LEDs distribute light more evenly across the canopy, which can reduce canopy penetration but provides more uniform coverage.

So, on paper, LEDs is KING of the hill ladies and gentleman —LED lights produce more visible light and emit more photons per second than traditional HID lights. However, the penetration depth of HID lights can still offer advantages in certain grow setups, particularly when lighting large areas or deep canopies.

#Str8GasGang
The last sentence alone I would say is incorrect.
The only area still somewhat debatable is Spectrum. But at this point the trade off's are making that topic a wash :peace:
 
The last sentence alone I would say is incorrect.
The only area still somewhat debatable is Spectrum. But at this point the trade off's are making that topic a wash :peace:
the last sentence being "#GrowingStr8GasGang?" #Fudge lol
also boss I am no expert But I do produce a solid product indoors #Facts, so what do you mean by the only area still somewhat debatable is spectrum? we all know that blue light + UV light ='s plants dont strech as much during veg.... etc.....
But I made this article because I saw a post about LED VS HPS so I figured we should just put this topic 2 rest.
 
the last sentence being "#GrowingStr8GasGang?" #Fudge lol
also boss I am no expert But I do produce a solid product indoors #Facts, so what do you mean by the only area still somewhat debatable is spectrum? we all know that blue light + UV light ='s plants dont strech as much during veg.... etc.....
But I made this article because I saw a post about LED VS HPS so I figured we should just put this topic 2 rest.
"However, the penetration depth of HID lights can still offer advantages in certain grow setups, particularly when lighting large areas or deep canopies."
Led had been superior for penetration and even ppfd distribution for some time.
HPS is all about the infra-red end of the spectrum. Not UV/Blue. :peace:
 
"However, the penetration depth of HID lights can still offer advantages in certain grow setups, particularly when lighting large areas or deep canopies."
Led had been superior for penetration and even ppfd distribution for some time.
HPS is all about the infra-red end of the spectrum. Not UV/Blue. :peace:
well fuq me I assumed due to the single point light intensity that H.I.D bulbs produced light that penetrated deeper into the canopy vs LED. Testing Incoming!
I will update my article soon, thnx mate I appreciate your input!
Fuq know I gotta buy a high end D.E H.I.D setup T.T
 
Back
Top