They also only come in 2' lengths (too short for my cab) and 4' lengths (too long) -- that is called a limitation. In contrast, I have 4 240w blackstars that almost perfectly fit my cab. Nothing wrong with HOs though they are just a choice. LEDs are the more expensive option that doesn't mean they're worse.btw - if I just had the $$$, I would switch from HID to very hi output t-5's so fast it'd make yo head do a Linda Blair spin around
Fantastic, now let me know when I'm going to be able to put an equivalent amount of HPS in my cabinet without elaborate venting? Can't do it.I don't think LED's are as inherently efficient as some people believe. Due to the nature of the bulbs you cannot really vertically hang them (actually current designs wouldn't let you at all) at high intensities, at least not at the moment. Perhaps in the future.
I'm quite sure you will get more production per square foot AND energy input hanging vertically with conventional HIDs than using LEDs horizontally.
Sorry that is just not true. I am running over 500ws of ACTUAL led light (960 watts of bulbs, around 520-560w of actual light output) - FOUR 240w blackstars, producing LESS heat than a 400w digital HID in a cooltube with 252cfm inline fan venting it directly out of the cab. I was told by multiple people I would have heat problems as bad or worse than the 400w. Glad I didn't believe them. The 4 blackstars sit in there with NO active venting produce less heat than the 400w with active venting. I really hate when people talk about stuff they don't know. Perhaps this was true with old models -- my units are 2012s -- certainly not true now unless you just have an inefficiently designed light. The way mine are designed the hot air is pushed to the top of the cab as well due to the way the LED air in take/fans draw the air. That is on the cheap old blackstar. I imagine on a higher end light with better heat sinks and design, they are even more heat efficient.The whole thing about LEDs reducing heat isn't true if you replace 600w of hid with 600w of led overall heat is going to be about the same. Its just spread out more with the led. Also you need more watts of led light to replace HID from what I have seen I have seen people pull 1.3 gpw with 600w hid in soil, never seen anyone with led yeild this good. And check this out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udD0uhRwMU8 this guy pulled 38.4oz with a 600w MH ! If you find and led grow that is this efficient and isn't marketing bull please point me to it.
I was thinking of changing to Led recently but changed my mind when I wasn't able to find any grows with decent yields.
The last post on that site was Tue Dec 13, 2011ugcf.info led friendly forum for all
Physics state that 500w of power will produce more radiant heat than 400w, LEDS produce less direct heat, but the radiant heat is the same regardless. It's the same as the people who say 600w of CFL's produces less heat than a 600w HPS...no they produce roughly the same.They also only come in 2' lengths (too short for my cab) and 4' lengths (too long) -- that is called a limitation. In contrast, I have 4 240w blackstars that almost perfectly fit my cab. Nothing wrong with HOs though they are just a choice. LEDs are the more expensive option that doesn't mean they're worse.
Fantastic, now let me know when I'm going to be able to put an equivalent amount of HPS in my cabinet without elaborate venting? Can't do it.
Sorry that is just not true. I am running over 500ws of ACTUAL led light (960 watts of bulbs, around 520-560w of actual light output) - FOUR 240w blackstars, producing LESS heat than a 400w digital HID in a cooltube with 252cfm inline fan venting it directly out of the cab. I was told by multiple people I would have heat problems as bad or worse than the 400w. Glad I didn't believe them. The 4 blackstars sit in there with NO active venting produce less heat than the 400w with active venting. I really hate when people talk about stuff they don't know. Perhaps this was true with old models -- my units are 2012s -- certainly not true now unless you just have an inefficiently designed light. The way mine are designed the hot air is pushed to the top of the cab as well due to the way the LED air in take/fans draw the air. That is on the cheap old blackstar. I imagine on a higher end light with better heat sinks and design, they are even more heat efficient.
seriously. I understand the physics, but reality is reality. my 3amp LED panel puts out less thermals in my room while running, then a 3amp HID in the same environment - no venting at all, just the lights/ballasts in one room. HID = 95+ deg temps. LED = 78-80 degreees.
Yeah maybe initially that is true, but without ventilation the heat will build up to roughly the same. Check out the Second Law of Thermodynamics if you don believe me, all energy including light becomes heat.seriously. I understand the physics, but reality is reality. my 3amp LED panel puts out less thermals in my room while running, then a 3amp HID in the same environment - no venting at all, just the lights/ballasts in one room. HID = 95+ deg temps. LED = 78-80 degreees.
You cant run a sealed room with CFLs without AC, seriously. How do you renew CO2 levels since your room is "sealed"?my room is sealed and not vented. i stick by what I said - a 600w HID (3amps), with ballast in that room heats up to 95+; my stealthgrow 602 LED (3amps also) heats up the same space to 82 MAX (same temps outside the space and outside).