OK I have been making dry ice hash... as my primary "hash"
I have done Qwiso and bho... I am not a fan of either.. here is why
1. I honestly cant tell the diff with BHO or Qwiso (when iso was done properly)
2. Dry ice hash and cold water hash taste the same to me..
3. I can make Dry Ice hash in no time flat.. seriously no drying nothin more then basic prep
4. OK I admit BHO seems to hit a little better BUT... it's not something I wish to waste the time/energy on.
why is keif looked at like it's a roach? and less effective? Do other method do something to the thc to make it better? I can understand how some of you are purest and have to vacum purge bho or whatever..
but if keif is what fits thru the micron sizes used... the same will happen with BHO or ISO? so... a "purest" should prefer the keif dry ice way correct??
I have done Qwiso and bho... I am not a fan of either.. here is why
1. I honestly cant tell the diff with BHO or Qwiso (when iso was done properly)
2. Dry ice hash and cold water hash taste the same to me..
3. I can make Dry Ice hash in no time flat.. seriously no drying nothin more then basic prep
4. OK I admit BHO seems to hit a little better BUT... it's not something I wish to waste the time/energy on.
why is keif looked at like it's a roach? and less effective? Do other method do something to the thc to make it better? I can understand how some of you are purest and have to vacum purge bho or whatever..
but if keif is what fits thru the micron sizes used... the same will happen with BHO or ISO? so... a "purest" should prefer the keif dry ice way correct??