Judge Restores Voting Rights to Thousands of Illegally Purged Voters in North Carolina

bearkat42

Well-Known Member
A federal judge ruled on Friday that North Carolina’s recent voter purges likely violated federal law, ordering the restoration of voting rights to thousands of people—most of them minorities—in an emphatic ruling. U.S. District Judge Loretta Biggs, who previously described North Carolina’s system of revoking voting rights as “insane” and reminiscent of Jim Crow–style voter suppression, held that the purges constituted a “flawed process” that ran afoul of the National Voter Registration Act.

“Voter enfranchisement cannot be sacrificed when citizens through no fault of their own have been removed from the voter rolls,” Biggs concluded, writing that “the balance of the equities and public interest factors weigh decidedly in favor of protecting eligible voters who are being removed from the voter rolls.” She held that North Carolina must ensure that the purged voters are able to vote in the upcoming election so long as they remain otherwise eligible.

North Carolina’s peculiar system of voter purges has drawn nationwide outcry in recent days, spurred by an NAACP lawsuit and seconded by the Justice Department. In the state, any person can revoke anyone else’s voting rights. An individual need simply gather mail that was returned as undeliverable, then challenge the voter registration of residents at those addresses. If those voters do not appear at a county board of elections or return a notarized form, their voting rights are nullified. Republican activists have used this method to purge nearly 6,700 voters from the rolls throughout the state, a majority of them black.

Because the NAACP brought suit on behalf of voters in just three counties—Beaufort, Moore, and Cumberland—Biggs restricted her order to those counties. She ordered that all voters recently purged through the mass disenfranchisement scheme in those counties have their rights restored. That decision will likely restore voting rights to about 4,500 people, so long as county election boards comply with Biggs' order.

Given that Republican-controlled election boards have colluded to curtail the voting rights of minorities for months, their compliance with the new order is by no means certain. The Justice Department still plans to send election monitors to several North Carolina counties at the epicenter of this voting rights crisis on Election Day to ensure compliance with federal law.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/11/04/north_carolina_voting_purge_federal_judge_restores_rights.html
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
and why did the KKK newspaper endorse trump?

it was about the only newspaper endorsement he got, other than the enquirer. which is a supermarket tabloid.

i was gonna compare trump's campaign to a supermarket tabloid, but that's too high. trump's campaign is more like a youtube comment section.
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
and why did the KKK newspaper endorse trump?

it was about the only newspaper endorsement he got, other than the enquirer. which is a supermarket tabloid.

i was gonna compare trump's campaign to a supermarket tabloid, but that's too high. trump's campaign is more like a youtube comment section.

Hey they're not racist, it's just that the KKK is the only honest media left.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
A federal judge ruled on Friday that North Carolina’s recent voter purges likely violated federal law, ordering the restoration of voting rights to thousands of people—most of them minorities—in an emphatic ruling. U.S. District Judge Loretta Biggs, who previously described North Carolina’s system of revoking voting rights as “insane” and reminiscent of Jim Crow–style voter suppression, held that the purges constituted a “flawed process” that ran afoul of the National Voter Registration Act.

“Voter enfranchisement cannot be sacrificed when citizens through no fault of their own have been removed from the voter rolls,” Biggs concluded, writing that “the balance of the equities and public interest factors weigh decidedly in favor of protecting eligible voters who are being removed from the voter rolls.” She held that North Carolina must ensure that the purged voters are able to vote in the upcoming election so long as they remain otherwise eligible.

North Carolina’s peculiar system of voter purges has drawn nationwide outcry in recent days, spurred by an NAACP lawsuit and seconded by the Justice Department. In the state, any person can revoke anyone else’s voting rights. An individual need simply gather mail that was returned as undeliverable, then challenge the voter registration of residents at those addresses. If those voters do not appear at a county board of elections or return a notarized form, their voting rights are nullified. Republican activists have used this method to purge nearly 6,700 voters from the rolls throughout the state, a majority of them black.

Because the NAACP brought suit on behalf of voters in just three counties—Beaufort, Moore, and Cumberland—Biggs restricted her order to those counties. She ordered that all voters recently purged through the mass disenfranchisement scheme in those counties have their rights restored. That decision will likely restore voting rights to about 4,500 people, so long as county election boards comply with Biggs' order.

Given that Republican-controlled election boards have colluded to curtail the voting rights of minorities for months, their compliance with the new order is by no means certain. The Justice Department still plans to send election monitors to several North Carolina counties at the epicenter of this voting rights crisis on Election Day to ensure compliance with federal law.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/11/04/north_carolina_voting_purge_federal_judge_restores_rights.html
The Republican Party is the official party of fascism in 21st Century America. If this were the only example I could see people quibble, but it's more like the tip of the iceberg.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
The Republican Party is the official party of fascism in 21st Century America. If this were the only example I could see people quibble, but it's more like the tip of the iceberg.

Seems like the FBI is the Republican Party's equivalent of Hitler's SS. Trump's supporters are the equivalent of the brownshirts. Voter suppression is just one tool in their tool box.


Paul Waldman: Republicans are now vowing Total War. And the consequences could be immense.

http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/4548118-155/paul-waldman-republicans-are-now-vowing

It is important to understand that is not normal. This is not just bare-knuckle politics. Something extraordinary is happening.

Let's take the FBI case as just one example. You have a situation where a group of FBI agents is in direct conflict with prosecutors who believe the agents have a weak case in their attempt to find evidence of corruption that can be used against Clinton. The agents, in an atrocious violation of FBI policy against injecting the bureau into an election, begin leaking dark innuendo to reporters. That convinces the FBI director that he has no choice but to go public with the fact that the bureau is looking at some emails that might or might not have something to do with Clinton, though no one has actually read them. That news lands like a bombshell, despite its complete lack of substance.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Seems like the FBI is the Republican Party's equivalent of Hitler's SS. Trump's supporters are the equivalent of the brownshirts. Voter suppression is just one tool in their tool box.


Paul Waldman: Republicans are now vowing Total War. And the consequences could be immense.

http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/4548118-155/paul-waldman-republicans-are-now-vowing

It is important to understand that is not normal. This is not just bare-knuckle politics. Something extraordinary is happening.

Let's take the FBI case as just one example. You have a situation where a group of FBI agents is in direct conflict with prosecutors who believe the agents have a weak case in their attempt to find evidence of corruption that can be used against Clinton. The agents, in an atrocious violation of FBI policy against injecting the bureau into an election, begin leaking dark innuendo to reporters. That convinces the FBI director that he has no choice but to go public with the fact that the bureau is looking at some emails that might or might not have something to do with Clinton, though no one has actually read them. That news lands like a bombshell, despite its complete lack of substance.

complete lack of substance was confirmed.

Screenshot 2016-11-06 at 1.27.03 PM.png
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Those in control are used to having it all their way while no one is the wiser.

Not only has this election rolled back the rock these people have been hiding under thus exposing their dirty tricks, but serious challenges to their ongoing abuses of power have already begun.

The more they overreach, the more credibility and support they'll lose. That doesn't mean they'll go away; if official brutality continues to be tolerated, we'll end up with a very different country than the one we imagine we live in.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
complete lack of substance was confirmed.

View attachment 3824325
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/06/politics/comey-tells-congress-fbi-has-not-changed-conclusions/

FBI: Review of new emails doesn't change conclusion on Clinton

The laptop which was found was around a decade old, with lots of personal content on it not relevant to the investigation, according to one source.

Comey sent the letter as soon as possible, the senior law enforcement official said. He was "very careful" about how the letter was crafted given the sensitivities.

Attorney General Loretta Lynch was informed ahead of time that the FBI director was sending the updated letter to congress informing them of that there would be no change in the FBI stance on Hillary Clinton, a Justice official told CNN on Sunday.
Lynch supported the decision.

"Everyone is on the same page," the source said.

Since there is no change to the original findings, the Justice Department has no need to weigh in further, the official said.

I'm hoping another investigation is launched. That is, investigation into allegations that the members of a New York FBI right wing sect are leaking information to the benefit of Trump. The FBI has a long history of interfering with elections and government. Its time to shake that department up.

Now that's settled, let's get back to the many scandals of Benedict Donald, the traitor and sexual predator.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/donald-trump-faces-a-barrage-of-new-allegations/506060/

Donald Trump Faces a Barrage of New Allegations
A spate of new stories raise questions about the Republican nominee’s ties to Russia and his tax-avoidance schemes.
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/06/politics/comey-tells-congress-fbi-has-not-changed-conclusions/

FBI: Review of new emails doesn't change conclusion on Clinton

The laptop which was found was around a decade old, with lots of personal content on it not relevant to the investigation, according to one source.

Comey sent the letter as soon as possible, the senior law enforcement official said. He was "very careful" about how the letter was crafted given the sensitivities.

Attorney General Loretta Lynch was informed ahead of time that the FBI director was sending the updated letter to congress informing them of that there would be no change in the FBI stance on Hillary Clinton, a Justice official told CNN on Sunday.
Lynch supported the decision.

"Everyone is on the same page," the source said.

Since there is no change to the original findings, the Justice Department has no need to weigh in further, the official said.

I'm hoping another investigation is launched. That is, investigation into allegations that the members of a New York FBI right wing sect are leaking information to the benefit of Trump. The FBI has a long history of interfering with elections and government. Its time to shake that department up.

Now that's settled, let's get back to the many scandals of Benedict Donald, the traitor and sexual predator.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/donald-trump-faces-a-barrage-of-new-allegations/506060/

Donald Trump Faces a Barrage of New Allegations

A spate of new stories raise questions about the Republican nominee’s ties to Russia and his tax-avoidance schemes.

Holly shit! That is scary close to a president controlled by Moscow. The pieces of the puzzle are coming together now.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/donald-trump-faces-a-barrage-of-new-allegations/506060/

Donald Trump Faces a Barrage of New Allegations

A spate of new stories raise questions about the Republican nominee’s ties to Russia and his tax-avoidance schemes.
his campaign's direct collusion with e the FBI is the textbook definition of corruption.

the stank of corruption is all over donald, meanwhile, hillary has been completely vindicated in every word she said about this collusion between the trump campaign and the old, white, males at the FBI.
 
Top