rkymtnman
Well-Known Member
i'd set it at 5.5 and let it go up. Ca is better absorbed lower than 5.8Ph rolls around from 5.8 up to 6.4
i'd set it at 5.5 and let it go up. Ca is better absorbed lower than 5.8Ph rolls around from 5.8 up to 6.4
Negative on softner. I'm getting 93ppm on the filtered water. I know that from tap it says 68ppm calcium on city water chart. I'm running through carbon filters but not using the RO as membrane needs replacingand what is the starting ppm of your water? you said it's filtered: is it pretty close to 0 ppm?? and do you have a water softener too? that you use salt pellets for?
I saw it recommended for foiliar. Thanks for the heads up. Gypsum was on the cheap. This site has lots of stuff.With powdered gypsum. It's soluble and works fine. Doesn't settle out. Do not use chelated calcium in the feed routinely. It's better utilized as a foliar treatment all by itself or a limited use root feed.
i highly doubt it's zinc deficiency. almost every nute line has plenty of micros in them IMO. i think it looks more like Mg to me. but then you also have to look at if you have too much of X, is it causing a problem with Y.Negative on softner. I'm getting 93ppm on the filtered water. I know that from tap it says 68ppm calcium on city water chart. I'm running through carbon filters but not using the RO as membrane needs replacing