Is Oprah the Anti-Crist?
- Thread starter NewGrowth
- Start date
CrackerJax
New Member
Was that filmed in the USS Enterprise? 
Yes, he nailed it....and nailed it well. Never heard of him, but nice find NG.
Wonder where he "discovered" that watch...
Crackah, ahead of the pack and not looking back...
out.
Yes, he nailed it....and nailed it well. Never heard of him, but nice find NG.
Wonder where he "discovered" that watch...
Crackah, ahead of the pack and not looking back...
out.
NewGrowth
Well-Known Member
Was that filmed in the USS Enterprise?
Yes, he nailed it....and nailed it well. Never heard of him, but nice find NG.
Wonder where he "discovered" that watch...
Crackah, ahead of the pack and not looking back...
out.
Osho wore some crazy stuff. He had a great sense of humor.He taught tantra, often called the secret way. He is also called Rajnesh.
I "practice" Tantra on a daily basis, the revelations it has brought me have been both frightening and wonderful. Regardless of our own beliefs change remains constant always . . .
Here is another really good one on God:
[youtube]hhjOnYbKJJw[/youtube]
CrackerJax
New Member
Seems like you are on the right path NG !!
People are averse to knowledge which makes them unhappy.... religion, politics, whatevah.
The brave ones accept the truth no matter where it leads them. I accept my inevitable oblivion with humility and understanding that everything ends at our level. Only the atoms continue. I am just pleased that an agreement was worked out for me to be here, however briefly.
out.
People are averse to knowledge which makes them unhappy.... religion, politics, whatevah.
The brave ones accept the truth no matter where it leads them. I accept my inevitable oblivion with humility and understanding that everything ends at our level. Only the atoms continue. I am just pleased that an agreement was worked out for me to be here, however briefly.
out.
Brazko
Well-Known Member
The funny part about that is atoms are made up of mostly empty space . . . . so we are made mostly of nothing
This is simply like Bob said the universe experiencing itself subjectively, a dream . . . .
Fascinating isn't it.....we are basically space conjoined.....reality is not solid proof of anything.........atoms are held together by gravity they neva make contact....we just perceive we are solid....not to get into time /space....but merely the speed and frequency we exist in.....the only thing that keeps light, us, objects, etc....from passing through walls and shit is little thing called magnetic force generated by single or conjoined atoms that repel each other....nothing is solid...we simply just bounce off of each others magnetic field....the mystics call this your aura or magen
SweatyC
Active Member
Well in all fairness atoms actually do make contact (Ex: Elastic Scattering, or a Nuclear Reactor that uses neutrons to split atoms) How do you think stuff gets really hot, it's the kinetic energy of the atoms and the subsequent collisions of them as well. The binding energy is what holds atoms together and can be broken through natural decay methods done over time, or by various unnatural methods, one being Neutron Induced Fission. So therefore, atoms are not immortal either. There's A LOT more about Nuclear Physics that is simply mind-blowing. I recommend everyone do some research on it, it's grossly misinterpreted and really is a powerful and amazing tool we have.
Oh yeah, and the magnetic force of repulsion is trippy, huh. Makes you wonder about touch, taste, and all your other senses.
Brazko
Well-Known Member
Well in all fairness I can't agree or disagree....b/c the atom is obliterated, and that collision is the magnetic force surrounding the atoms colliding....heat is generated by the expanding and shrinking of that field around that atom pumping energy into it aka heat....but I could be wrong completelyWell in all fairness atoms actually do make contact (Ex: Elastic Scattering, or a Nuclear Reactor that uses neutrons to split atoms) How do you think stuff gets really hot, it's the kinetic energy of the atoms and the subsequent collisions of them as well. The binding energy is what holds atoms together and can be broken through natural decay methods done over time, or by various unnatural methods, one being Neutron Induced Fission. So therefore, atoms are not immortal either. There's A LOT more about Nuclear Physics that is simply mind-blowing. I recommend everyone do some research on it, it's grossly misinterpreted and really is a powerful and amazing tool we have.
Oh yeah, and the magnetic force of repulsion is trippy, huh. Makes you wonder about touch, taste, and all your other senses.
....I'm rusty and will dutifully do my research with the info you have provided.
To add as well.....binding energy is another form or word for gravity / pull....I think of it in the same sense as our solar system...with the sun as the nucleus and the planets electrons being held together by gravity...ad yes this link is always decaying as well......
Not auto of the precise numbers, but we have been losing our moon every year a few cm or inch or so, but I doubt nothing you say and as before said will do my part to better understand
SweatyC
Active Member
Yeah, you've got a pretty good understanding, but I think you're a little rusty on some aspects. The atom isn't completely obliterated in the sense of the word. It's split into multiple other, now different atoms along with photons, probably some other negligable molecules, and new neutrons to carry on more fission. For Uanium it would probably be Xenon or Iodine and some other chemical like Thorium.
Sure, objects expand and contract with temperature changes, but under severe high temps the kinetic energy of the atoms rises greatly and they will collide with eachother by overcoming the magnetic force of repulsion.
Gravity is still a huge mystery to science. So I can't really confirm or deny your statement, but typically in Nuclear Physics the two are perceived very much differently.
Again, the one frustrating thing about nuclear physics, like a lot of science, is it is all extremely theoretical. But this is how modern science believes it to be and it does make sense and definitely works.
Brazko
Well-Known Member
well yeah, I am rusty, and I do try to have an open understanidg......obliterated wasn't meant into nothing, quarks....eventually, and when atoms overcome the magnetic field they obliterate or bond to each other....what you are referring to with elastic scattering is the removal of an electron........we gain and lose electrons all the time (energy being released in the process), but once this happen the energy released is from the subsequent outer electron dropping down into is place kinda.......but never does an electron ever disrupt the nucleus (atom as a whole) it is repelled away, unless we talk nuclear fusion which is the emitting of tremedous energy and subsequent bonding of like charged nuclei......and temperature changes causing objects to expand and contract is not quiet the same as being referred to in this instance for it has no bearing on the magnetic field that still surrounds them........when atoms collide the magnetic field / force between the two interact boucing off each other w/o actual physical contact being made.......like a bouncing ball.....expanding and contracting causing a pumping motion around the atom, filling it with energy, dissipating as heat........but like said, I'm rusty, can't do nothing but get sharper I guess, and doesn't still prove I'm right, in fact what would I be able to learn if I knew it already, life would be boringYeah, you've got a pretty good understanding, but I think you're a little rusty on some aspects. The atom isn't completely obliterated in the sense of the word. It's split into multiple other, now different atoms along with photons, probably some other negligable molecules, and new neutrons to carry on more fission. For Uanium it would probably be Xenon or Iodine and some other chemical like Thorium.
Sure, objects expand and contract with temperature changes, but under severe high temps the kinetic energy of the atoms rises greatly and they will collide with eachother by overcoming the magnetic force of repulsion.
Gravity is still a huge mystery to science. So I can't really confirm or deny your statement, but typically in Nuclear Physics the two are perceived very much differently.
Again, the one frustrating thing about nuclear physics, like a lot of science, is it is all extremely theoretical. But this is how modern science believes it to be and it does make sense and definitely works.
.Im glad you posted, it's motivation for me to further understand what I think I know
been good chattering w/you , but Bob is on to Oprah, and I think this thread is about the Anti Crist.....Holla
CrackerJax
New Member
Yes, so far as we know now, energy (atoms) cannot be destroyed, only transformed into something else.
That is as close to immortality we will ever get. Being used by atoms. Our egos however fade away (thankfully).
out.
That is as close to immortality we will ever get. Being used by atoms. Our egos however fade away (thankfully).
out.
SweatyC
Active Member
Yeah, it's pretty cool finding someone that actually knows something about this kind of stuff. There are all sorts of crazy molecular reactions that are going on at the same time. But you should know that the forces of repulsion and attraction of an atom can be easily overcome, hence fission and fussion. If you want to read about something really cool, check out Pair Production....indeed, matter can be created and destroyed. It's when a high energy photon (no mass of course) in the presence of a nucleus turns into a positron and electron (2 masses) shooting off in different directions. It's pretty awesome.well yeah, I am rusty, and I do try to have an open understanidg......obliterated wasn't meant into nothing, quarks....eventually, and when atoms overcome the magnetic field they obliterate or bond to each other....what you are referring to with elastic scattering is the removal of an electron........we gain and lose electrons all the time (energy being released in the process), but once this happen the energy released is from the subsequent outer electron dropping down into is place kinda.......but never does an electron ever disrupt the nucleus (atom as a whole) it is repelled away, unless we talk nuclear fusion which is the emitting of tremedous energy and subsequent bonding of like charged nuclei......and temperature changes causing objects to expand and contract is not quiet the same as being referred to in this instance for it has no bearing on the magnetic field that still surrounds them........when atoms collide the magnetic field / force between the two interact boucing off each other w/o actual physical contact being made.......like a bouncing ball.....expanding and contracting causing a pumping motion around the atom, filling it with energy, dissipating as heat........but like said, I'm rusty, can't do nothing but get sharper I guess, and doesn't still prove I'm right, in fact what would I be able to learn if I knew it already, life would be boring
Im glad you posted, it's motivation for me to further understand what I think I know
been good chattering w/you , but Bob is on to Oprah, and I think this thread is about the Anti Crist.....Holla
I should also add that we have no idea how an atom is actually comprised. Bohr, himself, said his atomic model was simply for understanding not accuracy at all. So as far as on a physical sense, what science knows as a 'collision' is somewhat left for interpretation.
SweatyC
Active Member
An atom is a form of energy (E=mc2) And energy cannot be destroyed, however an atom as we know it can very easily be 'destroyed' and no longer exist in it's previous form. Hell, a proton can become a neutron, a neutron can become an electron, etc. It's kind of hard to imagine we're being 'used' by atoms, even in a figurative sense.Yes, so far as we know now, energy (atoms) cannot be destroyed, only transformed into something else.
That is as close to immortality we will ever get. Being used by atoms. Our egos however fade away (thankfully).
out.
CrackerJax
New Member
I think that is what I said.
We are not being "used" by the atoms as I have explained in my previous posts, but we exist by their agreement, so in a sense we are at their disposal. We will be disposed of as soon as the agreement ends by any number of variables.
out.
We are not being "used" by the atoms as I have explained in my previous posts, but we exist by their agreement, so in a sense we are at their disposal. We will be disposed of as soon as the agreement ends by any number of variables.
out.
SweatyC
Active Member
That's a pretty subjective statement. Almost emblematic wording, but I don't quite understand if there's supposed to be some sort of substantial meaning in any of it....other than we live, then we die....sort of lucid, right.I think that is what I said.
We are not being "used" by the atoms as I have explained in my previous posts, but we exist by their agreement, so in a sense we are at their disposal. We will be disposed of as soon as the agreement ends by any number of variables.
out.
CrackerJax
New Member
If you are positing that we can understand the motives of atoms, we cannot. They don't have any that we can discern. They are simply (not uncomplicated) the building blocks of the universe as we know it. We do exist by their agreement to come together to form us. Not that there is any sentiency in that agreement.
So yes, it is simply live and die. No hidden meaning, no hidden message. I am just glad the arrangement includes myself for even a brief time, but I recognize myself as the cog, not the wheel.
out.
So yes, it is simply live and die. No hidden meaning, no hidden message. I am just glad the arrangement includes myself for even a brief time, but I recognize myself as the cog, not the wheel.
out.
SweatyC
Active Member
I guess I was just confused on the word 'agreement', which I consider a sentient term. I like the cog and wheel analogy, I never heard that one before. But I don't understand why so many people have to insist on absolute indubitableness of their beliefs (Christians, Islamics, Atheists, etc.) I'm not sure if you're actually implying any of that...I may be (more than likely) misinterpreting you again....and if so, sorry in advance. But seriously, why can't we all just agree that life is an amazing enigma or at least extremely subjective. There's a very ignorant "I'm right, you're wrong" attitude when it comes to anything epistemological-based.....Uhhh, I'm going to stop myself right now....I can go on about this crap for days..... Anyways, no, I would never assume to know the 'motives' of an atom (lol) and I to am glad to be on the rollercoaster of life too.If you are positing that we can understand the motives of atoms, we cannot. They don't have any that we can discern. They are simply (not uncomplicated) the building blocks of the universe as we know it. We do exist by their agreement to come together to form us. Not that there is any sentiency in that agreement.
So yes, it is simply live and die. No hidden meaning, no hidden message. I am just glad the arrangement includes myself for even a brief time, but I recognize myself as the cog, not the wheel.
out.
bobharvey
Well-Known Member
atoms are made up of smaller particles so they can't be the "building blocks" of the universe. Every time we look further we find something else. Consciousness is the basic foundation of the Universe not atoms.If you are positing that we can understand the motives of atoms, we cannot. They don't have any that we can discern. They are simply (not uncomplicated) the building blocks of the universe as we know it. We do exist by their agreement to come together to form us. Not that there is any sentiency in that agreement.
So yes, it is simply live and die. No hidden meaning, no hidden message. I am just glad the arrangement includes myself for even a brief time, but I recognize myself as the cog, not the wheel.
out.
CrackerJax
New Member
Yes yes Bob acorns within the acorns...if we want to change gears and get into the specifics of quantum mechanics, I can do that. I am speaking in general terms here, but that does not invalidate what I said.
SweatyC, you made some good posts and I enjoyed reading them. I agree with your analogies and "agreement" may have not been a bulls eye approach. vocabulary and perspectives will create different interpretations.
It is religion in all of its forms which says it has the answers. I find this to be blatantly incorrect and a misguided form of gaining control of peoples free will. They are all incorrect. What religious types cannot stand is that there may be NO answer. On some level, I can understand it. Like reading a really good book but never knowing the end.
As I have posted before though, people don't like knowledge which makes them uncomfortable. However, if one does not know the ABC's of something it is not acceptable to insert X,Y&Z and pass it off as the same thing, and that is exactly what religion does. It holds us back.
out.
SweatyC, you made some good posts and I enjoyed reading them. I agree with your analogies and "agreement" may have not been a bulls eye approach. vocabulary and perspectives will create different interpretations.
It is religion in all of its forms which says it has the answers. I find this to be blatantly incorrect and a misguided form of gaining control of peoples free will. They are all incorrect. What religious types cannot stand is that there may be NO answer. On some level, I can understand it. Like reading a really good book but never knowing the end.
As I have posted before though, people don't like knowledge which makes them uncomfortable. However, if one does not know the ABC's of something it is not acceptable to insert X,Y&Z and pass it off as the same thing, and that is exactly what religion does. It holds us back.
out.
NewGrowth
Well-Known Member
Particle physics . . . . what a great mysterious science. The smaller the particles the more mysterious. The new theory based on E=MC2 is that all matter is in fact a condensed form of energy. So much empty space . . . . the ghost particle is the neutrino. Almost undetectable because it passes through "solid" matter. Energy= Mass x Speed of light squared
Very simple yet profound equation, all things only exist relative to other things . . . .