Is it curtains for Harper?

gb123 · Jul 7, 2015

doingdishes said:
addicted?? as far as i know that doesn't happen so shows a lot about the info and the source.
I thought that was one of the good things-non addictive...but that's only what i have read and experienced.

yes, that is one of the key points about MJ

PROVEN !

Gmack420 · Jul 7, 2015

gb123 said:
yes, that is one of the key points about MJ

PROVEN !

How can you be addicted to something with no addictive agents in it? Is he addicted to the fact mj helps in treatment of drug/alcohol addiction?

gb123 · Jul 7, 2015

I think its to help with anxiety in this case.

cannadan · Jul 7, 2015

had to fund his own defense....most likely...for a grow that wasn't... I'd suspect....
done under the mmar...
just reaching with this one..be seems highly likely

gb123 · Jul 7, 2015

what would a forum be without ?

whatup619 · Jul 7, 2015

Lets do the proper testing to really figure out the medicinal effects so we don't have to keep guessing

Gmack420 · Jul 7, 2015

whatup619 said:
Lets do the proper testing to really figure out the medicinal effects so we don't have to keep guessing

You're right there's not much data on the subject...
http://www.cannabis-med.org/studies/study.php

whatup619 · Jul 7, 2015

I am assuming thats fda documents? If not thats what am refering to is research that even the president can't ignore

Gquebed · Jul 7, 2015

doingdishes said:
addicted?? as far as i know that doesn't happen so shows a lot about the info and the source.
I thought that was one of the good things-non addictive...but that's only what i have read and experienced.

Addicted to growing asshole. Cant you read?

GrowRock · Jul 7, 2015

whatup619 said:
I am assuming thats fda documents? If not thats what am refering to is research that even the president can't ignore

Look up The late great DR Lester Grinspoon who was the head of Harvard medicals book cannabis reevaluated. The government has known for years about the benefits of cannabis but like making money hints the war on drugs.....

Gquebed · Jul 7, 2015

Gmack420 said:
So why not tell us specifically what you've done? Stop speaking generalitys. What criminal prosecutions did you help fund the defense for? What did you lobby? Who did you lobby? When did you do this lobbying? What political party did you advise? Who in that party did you advise? What documentarys did you have a part in? What specifically did you contribute? Don't fucking make such wide sweeping claims with no supporting proof. Please show me. Shut me up.

Before naming names i would have to ask permission.

I dont advise personally. I contract consulting firms for particular political parties.

Did you know the Liberals came within a breath of passing legislation that wouldve fully legalized weed just before Harper took office? Probably not...

doingdishes · Jul 7, 2015

Gquebed said:
Addicted to growing asshole. Cant you read?

now you are calling me names...hahahahaaaaaa. really mature!
of the people who commented on your post-you single me out to call me that....nice...original..can't you do better than that?
in response to you name calling-ouch...you really hurt me.....ooooohhhhhhhh
still no proof huh...............and we are supposed to believe YOU did ANYTHING except spout?

whatup619 · Jul 7, 2015

Great information guys just when I thought I new it all lol..I enjoy learning something new everyday

Gquebed · Jul 7, 2015

doingdishes said:
prove it! give us a documentary you were in...or some kind of paperwork...if you have been doing all that you claim you should have something.
i am guessing you will retort with something saying you won't or don't have to....and that would be the pot calling the kettle black...so let's see it

I wasnt in a any docs. I said i fund them for fuck sakes....another illiterate...

doingdishes · Jul 7, 2015

Gquebed said:
Before naming names i would have to ask permission.

I dont advise personally. I contract consulting firms for particular political parties.

Did you know the Liberals came within a breath of passing legislation that wouldve fully legalized weed just before Harper took office? Probably not...

prove it!
you have been asked to provide proof of ANYTHING you stated yet nothing.....answer your phone...it's the kettle calling you

Gmack420 · Jul 7, 2015

whatup619 said:
I am assuming thats fda documents? If not thats what am refering to is research that even the president can't ignore

Well in Canada the president has no say in our laws.

doingdishes · Jul 7, 2015

Gquebed said:
I wasnt in a any docs. I said i fund them for fuck sakes....another illiterate...

you said you were funding documentaries...which one or ones?
back up your words...bet you can't.....

Gmack420 · Jul 7, 2015

Gquebed said:
Before naming names i would have to ask permission.

I dont advise personally. I contract consulting firms for particular political parties.

Did you know the Liberals came within a breath of passing legislation that wouldve fully legalized weed just before Harper took office? Probably not...

So you haven't done what you just claimed you did? Cool that exactly what I thought! Thanks for confirmation

Gmack420 · Jul 7, 2015

whatup619 said:
I am assuming thats fda documents? If not thats what am refering to is research that even the president can't ignore

It clearly says who did the research. Please I'm not trying to be mean to you but this is the Canadian section not the American section. So your comments seem very out of place amd very uninformed. I provided you with a link that has info on dozens and dozens of studies that show marijuana's medical benifits. I could care less what the fda, Fbi, dea, atf, cia, or bfi has to say about it.

Gquebed · Jul 7, 2015

Gmack420 said:
So you haven't done what you just claimed you did? Cool that exactly what I thought! Thanks for confirmation

Another one that cant read... i said i funded...and listed a few things including consulting....

Is it curtains for Harper?

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member