injunction/court case updates
- Thread starter doingdishes
- Start date
Gquebed
Well-Known Member
One of those who fell through the cracks eh?
Oh well...doesnt matter. I never stopped growing. And i never will. He cocksuckers can throw my ass in jail if they want. And it will just cost them HUGE. Take an upstanding, taxpaying, economic contributor and make him a ward of the state over a fuckin plant.
Take my wages out of the economy... take my house and those taxes with my income tax out of their coffers and then make tax payers foot 40k per year to keep me behind bars...stupid cunts...
itsmehigh
Well-Known Member
I would like to think that anybody with the support of their doctor would be safe from prosecution to possess or to cultivate for their personal needs. Even though your pinks have expired you still have the support of your doctor, if your growing within reasonable amounts you should be safe. Keep doing what you need to do, it's now been proven in the Supreme Court of Canada that growing medical cannabis for personal use is protected under your charter of rights and freedoms.
Itsme.
Gquebed
Well-Known Member
Kept my pinks and i have always been under the numbers in those. The above was just my rant that wouldve been by rant/only defence if i had to go before a judge.
Guess ill see what hapoens in 6 months... see if i can be bothered with ever reapplying for any kind of license....
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
[QUOTE="itsmehigh, post: 12356084, member: 473957"the effectiveness diminishes on a u curve, consuming more has no bennifit.
Itsme.[/QUOTE]
When I am in pain, I smoke more to relieve the symptoms...benefits me.A blanket statement like that is inaccurate. Plant counts could be affected, but not daily consumption. I'm gonna use what I need.
Itsme.[/QUOTE]
When I am in pain, I smoke more to relieve the symptoms...benefits me.A blanket statement like that is inaccurate. Plant counts could be affected, but not daily consumption. I'm gonna use what I need.
itsmehigh
Well-Known Member
I've been growing underground for decades never had an issue. Any legitimate cannabis patient would be silly not to apply for a personal cultivation licence. It's now your right as a Canadian to do so. Peace of mind is big in my books. Having that licence would prevent any scrutinization from the law. You could sleep at night knowing that you are officially protected under your charter of rights and freedoms.
Itsme
Itsme
itsmehigh
Well-Known Member
When I am in pain, I smoke more to relieve the symptoms...benefits me.A blanket statement like that is inaccurate. Plant counts could be affected, but not daily consumption. I'm gonna use what I need.[/QUOTE]
Not my words, just relaying what the "experts" say and probably what the new MMPR will be based on. I agree with you Chris. But there is a point of excess, personally I can't see someone needing 100 grams day, it has to be within reason. I'm not medical, I smoke it for fun, I smoke a lot, but I could never ingest dozens of grams a day and still function. That's just me.
Itsme
Gquebed
Well-Known Member
Well...thats why i went the legal way in the first place. Then Harper happened.
Who is to say that wont happen again. Very unlikely, i know...but... i resent the fact that all of this is even an issue to begin with. Everybody should be allowed to grow without licenses. To me, this is not the business of the gov...unless youre distributing....
Who is to say that wont happen again. Very unlikely, i know...but... i resent the fact that all of this is even an issue to begin with. Everybody should be allowed to grow without licenses. To me, this is not the business of the gov...unless youre distributing....
itsmehigh
Well-Known Member
the decision touched on personal consumption, saying it was arbitrary to limit personal consumption. But on the other hand saying that 6 plants could provide the same amount as 600 plants. I bet the new MMPR will reflect plant numbers and not personal usage. The judge also said that personal possession of 150 gram limit stands. That equals 5 grams aday, if that number holds up, plant counts most likely will revolve around that. Not sure what 5 grams day translates to under the Mmar plant count.
Itsme.
Itsme.
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
yeah, I hope they leave us mmar patients 'grandfathered' if they are going to drop plant counts. I usually only grow 25 but I'd like to keep the option of up to 49.
maddtrapper
Active Member
I am still waiting for the response from the crown, wonder if they will ask for an extension?
maddtrapper
Active Member
it means all of our court costs get reimbursed , war chest for Conroy, Tousaw be interesting to see what happens to the funds we raised.
Cheers
itsmehigh
Well-Known Member
To me that sound fair, any accomplished grower could be harvesting 10-30lbs every 4 months in 600sft. I've seen it done. That's upward of 2.5lbs a month or 37 grams a day.
Itsme.
spider9
Well-Known Member
at the end of Conroy's media event he said now we have to make dispensaries legal so maybe use that money to keep up the fight? just saying we won so we got what we paid for so lets see how far we can go with what is already invested can't see them giving it all back
martyg
Well-Known Member
Not my words, just relaying what the "experts" say and probably what the new MMPR will be based on. I agree with you Chris. But there is a point of excess, personally I can't see someone needing 100 grams day, it has to be within reason. I'm not medical, I smoke it for fun, I smoke a lot, but I could never ingest dozens of grams a day and still function. That's just me.
Itsme depends how one medicated. If juiced its easily to use 100g a day
martyg
Well-Known Member
From what I understand it's 150g possession yes on your person. But not in your storage amount. Someone correct me if IM incorrect
torontomeds
Well-Known Member
Nice try.... they are going to make a new system, it will apply to all.
martyg
Well-Known Member
Lol why you saying this. Do you know something everyone else doesn't. Please fill us in since the gov. Doesn't even know what they're gonna do hahah