littlejacob
Well-Known Member
Bonjour
I choose 3500k cxb 3590 because of the CD bin!
Have a great day ★
I choose 3500k cxb 3590 because of the CD bin!
Have a great day ★
Thank you for the clarifications; makes a lot of sense put this way. I'm very interested into 4000k or higher, as the light looks much better. Until now, I though it would be too much waste on the greens, on to little power on the reds, but if there are convincing tests proving it works, it would be a nice solution. As stated, I'm not interested into marijuana growing, but all kinds of flowering plants.You should read this thread for understanding why high CRI chips suck (for plant lighting, at the moment): https://www.rollitup.org/t/cree-cxa-analysis.743645/
Besides I only said it won't hurt to combine different spectra, but IF I was to do it I would try optimising the spacing to bring an even mix to the canopy, just like you wouldn't throw a spoon of sugar into your coffee without stirring. I also said I am not yet convinced by mixing (mono) spectra because of the labor and probably higher material cost, although I am generally interested in adding in deep red as long as it keeps up with the white cob's (red) efficiency.
I have to admit that my own lights have Vero 3500k and 3000K in it. That happened because I wanted to hit the "magic" 40% with the 3500K Vero 1.2 back then, which was also possible with the 3000K Vero 2.0 when it became available mid-construction of the second panel. I told myself that the 3000 3500 3000 3500 3000 bar was shaping the canopy in a certain way but I think it didn't matter, as the spectra are very close to each other. After all, I now favour an all-3000K version because of the relativly higher red, although I read reports claiming that even 4000K is delivering fine. There is a tradeoff between higher red and higher efficiency but it is probably negligible in terms of yield. A lot of people here now choose 3500K because they hate agonising over this dilemma.
Do you have a link to one of those monos ? I'm quite interested in this setup.Bonjour
I believe that he mean 5000k plus red (monos) runned soft...
A light with 5ks driven at 350ma are 66.4% and reds at 700ma are 42.4%,Can you translate for the noob I'm am ? 60% efficiency (I guess) by running 5000k cxbs soft - and what about red ?
This is great! A couple of years ago, when I first read about leds, people would target 30-40%... What reds are you using ? Osram Olson or Cree XP-E (or anything else) ?A light with 5ks driven at 350ma are 66.4% and reds at 500ma are 45.86%,
Depending on the ratio you use.... you can come out anywhere in between
Mine is roughly 55.17% efficient. (8 5k, 19 660)
Appreciate the input, I know they ain't great but I would still like to know what drivers I would need to power them. Cheaper alternatives to the hlg range preferably.Those are garbage. If you look at the lumen output compared to the wattage, you are at about 80 lumen per watt. Just use Vero 29s if you are on a budget. If ran at 80 watts you are over 130 lumen per watt.
20w/ 30w /50wAppreciate the input, I know they ain't great but I would still like to know what drivers I would need to power them. Cheaper alternatives to the hlg range preferably.
x3Also how many vero 29s can I fit in series on a hlg 185h c1400 driver
Would I need one driver for each of those cheap cobs or could I string a few together.
Would I need one driver for each of those cheap cobs or could I string a few together.