Abiqua
Well-Known Member
32 to 64 oz is fine.....pot size is actually one of my bigger space losses. Any opinions on pots? Am i better off with a deeper one or a wide pot at half the height? I really want to stick with a soil grow.
32 to 64 oz is fine.....pot size is actually one of my bigger space losses. Any opinions on pots? Am i better off with a deeper one or a wide pot at half the height? I really want to stick with a soil grow.
I wouldn't fill up more than 50-60w's of 40+% efficient diodes, unless you want to run dual exhaust fans or a loud exhaust fan....The lower the wattage the better for your use. Also with your limited space you won't get much gain from taller plants without side lighting as only the top will really get light anyway.
Get wide instead of tall buckets too for more space.
Seems like a lot of waste with all that green light that will mostly just reflect off the plant. The charts are too small to read the scale to see exactly what wavelengths of red it's putting out too, looks like the yellow/red peak may be a bit far left for best absorption.
Seems like a lot of waste with all that green light that will mostly just reflect off the plant. They charts are too small to read the scale to see exactly what wavelengths of red it's putting out too, looks like the yellow/red peak may be a bit far left for best absorption.
View attachment 3325700
Load all the green you guys want. I will be avoiding wasting my time with it.
I wouldn't run no green, I would just avoid running something that peaks in green. I want light of all used wavelengths just a lot more of the most usable wavelengths. I would prefer the peaks to be in the red or blue ranges and the valleys to be in the green, but not no green.Please tell me we're not going to debate that all you need is blue and red,you know we're on earth and not in space.
Try this on for size...View attachment 3325700
View attachment 3325718
Load all the green you guys want. I will be avoiding wasting my time with it.
take your chloro chart and lay it over the HPS's spd............it literally is almost the complete opposite== ha
HPS is more yellow than green, but it doesn't exactly hit ideal.
I wouldn't run no green, I would just avoid running something that peaks in green. I want light of all used wavelengths just a lot more of the most usable wavelengths. I would prefer the peaks to be in the red or blue ranges and the valleys to be in the green, but not no green.
So no debate needed unless someone says they want the peak to be in the green.
Try this on for size...
View attachment 3325730
Your chart that shows extreme peaks is very misleading...it was found by individually extracting the pigments into petri dishes...then exiting them with each light nm.
As where the McCree curve I just posted(no relation to cree led's)...is the whole intact leafs response to different the light nm's. and is what biologist, botanist, and plant physiologist refer to for real scientific studies.
EDIT:
Also check out this amazing piece of work...
https://www.rollitup.org/t/cree-cxa-3000k-80cri-spectrum-analysis.832666/
lets just say I have every sds post in there printed incase the website ever takes shit.
I agree...............efficiency matters in a grow light! hard to believeI got what you need
View attachment 3325747
I agree...............efficiency matters in a grow light! hard to believe
do you know if anyone has tested/grown with the nextgensystem panel linked^^ above that looks like a "birdhouse"??(credit Cocola)
Old news ....Just so I can get this straight and find the latest greatest version of what the plant can actually absorb, what to you guys think of this?
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=293045
At $3.25 a watt I would like to know what LEDs they're using.
WW xml2.......don't know if it's the same as in the onyx bloom, won't give me a group/bin#.......big surpriseThe birdhouse...funny shit.
But no...I haven't seen them in person yet. Someone else brought them up months ago...I still have never seen the bottom/led's of the panel. I haven't searched very hard though.
It's just a very vague website, as usual. But would love to see what they are offering. I always have hope for a WW spectrum assuming the output is behind it. But the website is disappointing as well as web searches.