If they come for your guns, do you have a responsibility to fight?
- Thread starter zambonic
- Start date
kelly4
Well-Known Member
In Minnesota, a DNR agent can go anwhere on ANY property if he is checking for violations. If he thinks that he has a reason to believe you might have more fish fitets in your freezer than you should, he can come into your house without a warrant to check. Anything he happens to see while walking through your house can be used against you. ANYTHING.
DNR officers have much more leeway than a cop.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
kelly4
Well-Known Member
Look it up.This sounds like a fish story.
Have I told you about the 30 pound walleye I once caught?
Grandpapy
Well-Known Member
Same in Va. If they think you have a butting buck, they will respond with the right hand of God.This sounds like a fish story.
If its your own farm, no worries then.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
They walked right into the garage of a guy I was working with went to his freezer and pulled out 3 sturgeon he rocked in a shallow stream
6000 dollar fine
budlover13
King Tut
In Cali, you best be using federally approved non-tox rounds if hunting.
budlover13
King Tut
YEP! YEP! YEP!!!!! 80% lowers/receivers are the way to go imo. A buddy just made his first 10/22 with an 80%. Yep, legal bro
That being said, you best have copies of the laws on your person when carrying said weapon. Most cops don't believe it lol. But legal, yep yep yep!YEP! YEP! YEP!!!!! 80% lowers/receivers are the way to go imo. A buddy just made his first 10/22 with an 80%. Yep, legal bro
Funny that you need a copy of the law to show the cops, but if you don't know a law ignorance is no excuse, but it is if you are a cop.
budlover13
King Tut
Right? That's when I take GREAT pleasure in educating our local LEO as to the intricacies of the law.
budlover13
King Tut
If you don't have the fortitude to stand your ground and inform the officers of the law, 80% lowers MIGHT not be for you. It's about being aggressive in asserting your rights.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
They know the law damn well and hope you don't know enough to call them on their bullshit. Cops have super powers. I'm required to always tell the truth, but they can lie for the greater good. Which I don't get. My lies are for the greater good too, mine.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
A LEO takes GREAT pleasure placing you in a holding cell for no reason and releasing you in 71 hours.
They'll give back your gun. If it doesn't work properly, maybe you should've taken better care of it.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
To live in such a country...YEP! YEP! YEP!!!!! 80% lowers/receivers are the way to go imo. A buddy just made his first 10/22 with an 80%. Yep, legal bro
Im pretty sure if I put a rubber band on a stick its considered a firearm.
tekdc911
Well-Known Member
well the response i got at the leesville louisiana walmart was that handgun munitions were pulled and that they would possibly stop selling firearms
tekdc911
Well-Known Member
game managment agents are the only people that can take your house , freezer truck , boat , and firearms if used to illegally take game
Bluezdude
Well-Known Member
I read up to page 37-ish or something and wow, what an argument!
My 0.02€ now.
In order for an argument to stand, the objectivity of the person behind it must be taken into account, so before I get into the argument a couple of things about me. I'm a social anarchist, 100% against capitalism, 100% against the state. I do not believe that violence solves anything when logic can be applied and prevail. Also I'm living in a country where guns are fully prohibited with huge penalties.
At the same moment I'm living in a country where government oppression becomes worse day after day. The police is becoming militarized, their purpose is not to fight crime but to suppress people and at some point the shit will hit the fan.
Counter-violence is NOT violence. If the state can use violence, the people should be able to react to it. One cannot be a pacifist if s/he has no weapon! Pacifism has to be an option, i.e. I have the means of violence and I choose not to use them, thus I'm a pacifist. If I don't have the means, that doesn't make me a pacifist as any other alternative is out of the question.
Simple logic here. You guys (and girls) should be happy that you have a right that everyone should have, to have the means that allow you to be able to exercise the same force as the one by the government. If you lose it, then I'm sorry to say that you'll regret it soon after.
And finally, regarding all the shootings that take place in your country, instead of trying to ban guns (effect) try to find the cause behind it. You got people that live under the poverty line, your health care is shit, income inequalities rise all the time etc. (cause). Solve that shit and then you'll see that the gun argument is totally irrelevant. The way things are discussed atm, is like trying to kill every mite by hand instead of spraying some neem oil on the plant!
Greetings from Greece
My 0.02€ now.
In order for an argument to stand, the objectivity of the person behind it must be taken into account, so before I get into the argument a couple of things about me. I'm a social anarchist, 100% against capitalism, 100% against the state. I do not believe that violence solves anything when logic can be applied and prevail. Also I'm living in a country where guns are fully prohibited with huge penalties.
At the same moment I'm living in a country where government oppression becomes worse day after day. The police is becoming militarized, their purpose is not to fight crime but to suppress people and at some point the shit will hit the fan.
Counter-violence is NOT violence. If the state can use violence, the people should be able to react to it. One cannot be a pacifist if s/he has no weapon! Pacifism has to be an option, i.e. I have the means of violence and I choose not to use them, thus I'm a pacifist. If I don't have the means, that doesn't make me a pacifist as any other alternative is out of the question.
Simple logic here. You guys (and girls) should be happy that you have a right that everyone should have, to have the means that allow you to be able to exercise the same force as the one by the government. If you lose it, then I'm sorry to say that you'll regret it soon after.
And finally, regarding all the shootings that take place in your country, instead of trying to ban guns (effect) try to find the cause behind it. You got people that live under the poverty line, your health care is shit, income inequalities rise all the time etc. (cause). Solve that shit and then you'll see that the gun argument is totally irrelevant. The way things are discussed atm, is like trying to kill every mite by hand instead of spraying some neem oil on the plant!
Greetings from Greece
kelly4
Well-Known Member
And a warrant was not needed. If they had found anything illegal other than the sturgeon, they would have called the cops. Even if they make a mistake and go to the wrong house by accident, anything they see can be used against you...without a warrant.