If they come for your guns, do you have a responsibility to fight?

cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
NLXSK1 said:
So I become a criminal yet again in the eyes of my government...

They have no record of my weapon, they will not get any record of my weapon. Therefore, they are not going to confiscate my weapon. I am guessing that even if they took the majority of weapons there would still be 50 million of them in America. Add to the fact that the police will still be armed and they are not immune to theft and there will be a nice black market in gun running in the USA.

Welcome to Amerika....
Click to expand...
If it ever comes to that, NL, I will get serious about my campaign to suggest that police be held to civilian gun law. I think that is an all-'round good idea. cn
 
tekdc911

tekdc911

Well-Known Member
all the actions taken are to control a civilian uprising gun control is only meant to prevent law abiding citizens from owning weapons the criminals dont care if its illegal to own or use them in a normal americans hands a weapon of any kind saves lives a criminal will always be just that .... a gun is like a condom really sucks when you need one and dont have one
 
tekdc911

tekdc911

Well-Known Member
tekdc911 said:
all the actions taken are to control a civilian uprising gun control is only meant to prevent law abiding citizens from owning weapons the criminals dont care if its illegal to own or use them in a normal americans hands a weapon of any kind saves lives a criminal will always be just that .... a gun is like a condom really sucks when you need one and dont have one
Click to expand...
its hard to dismantle the constitution if the people still have a voice and the means to defend it
 
tekdc911

tekdc911

Well-Known Member
if civilians can defend themselves then the gov. and police dept lose money and in the end thats what its all about $
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
If Gabby Giffords would have had armed protection which was her right if she asked for it or if another person in the crowd was armed they would not have to wait for him to shoot more rounds.
Click to expand...
Security!! Need Security, over here! Had the guy that saved her had the skiils and means to kill, he wouldn't need to save her.

The entire debate is mumbled by both sides, like large flightless avians with mouthfuls of sand.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
You may wish to familiarize yourself with the opinion Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer committed to paper in the wake of McDonald v. Chicago. Two principles are at work here:
1) the Constitution says what the Supreme Court says it says.
2) If four (three, really ... Sotomayor will very probably rule against the Second being for and about the people, once she senses possibility of a majority) justices with similar views are appointed to that bench, we can expect the Second to be dismantled without much ado.
And then the antigun forces will have a free hand. 'Ware the Ratchet. cn
Click to expand...
All about try, not do. A progressive court will try. In the future a conservative court will try again. BTW, I noticed Judge Sutor's house was broken into in the Virgin Islands. No one is immune from the way of the gun. One well aimed slug breaks the Ratchet. One well defined Case, even Sotomayor cannot dodge. They are jurists first. They are not stupid.

Even 9 Sotomayors couldn't pull down the 2nd. Oh they can make the Ratchet. But, we know the lessons of history.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Grandpapy said:
I guess limiting the number of rounds is cheaper then addressing the problem of mental health.....
Click to expand...
Addressing mental health will help a lot, but our psychiatry is still effectively Neolithic. it won't begin to satisfy the folks who use school shootings to illustrate what amounts to a zero-tolerance policy. cn
 
Canna Sylvan

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
zambonic said:
Here is a link to a story from The New American website. I think this may be the answer to the unconstitutional gun grab this administration has hinted at. The states and local sheriffs are going to have to spear head this fight.

http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/14187-wyoming-bill-would-nullify-obama-gun-control-jail-feds
Click to expand...
I hope this gets Obama removed from office. There's no greater offense a president can do than violate the Constitution, especially one like the 2nd amendment.
 
tekdc911

tekdc911

Well-Known Member
how on earth if you heard 100 shots from a military rifle .223 has a very very distinct hard to miss Shit Just Hit The Fan crack to it would you not atleast once talk about it in a interview
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top