lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
Just stating facts, you are the delusional ones.
i told ya so
- Thread starter UncleBuck
- Start date
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
the irony of you asserting this nonsense in the "i told ya so" thread is like music to my ears.
behold mighty mcronald, and his meaningless smattering of 150 or so delegates!
MixedMelodyMindBender
Active Member
Uncle Buck, i was going to take you up on your offer to lick my balls but I found your sister Mitt says shes got years of exp in everything....especially ball bag makeovers
If you are insisting you would rather see Romney instead of Paul......you just 1 of the MILLIONS of SHEEP ASLEEP IN AMERICA.
Braindead, but walking.
A mormon to lead the free world??? A fuckin Mormon, Im suicidal just envisioning it. When I say FREEDOM....DO you picture MORMONISM???????? Yeah Better!
If we think Romney has the answers to the problems that are in America....Then we are the epitome of sheep.
I promise you think UB, if Romney gets in, You won't be here on this site giving him big D...you'll be giving him big D
No, I am not for Ron Paul. I am sadly for taking the lesser of the evil, Obama. So far, shit has unglued.
Hands down, Paul is the more intelligent then Romney and Obama put together, literally. I'd rather have a DR or a Lawyer for President, than a Mormon, or a religious zealot.
No I am not racist, but I am against religious zealots who use religion to get into positions of power for their own interest. Romney is the biggest friend Special Interest groups have ever known. Special Interest sound like freedom??????
We are 1 step away from literally becoming the modern Nazi Germany....and you want a Mormon zealot to lead us out???
No, you don't have to respond UB. I am no longer interested in reading anything you have to say, not that I was before. You have managed quite the troll like persona in this community.
If you are insisting you would rather see Romney instead of Paul......you just 1 of the MILLIONS of SHEEP ASLEEP IN AMERICA.
Braindead, but walking.
A mormon to lead the free world??? A fuckin Mormon, Im suicidal just envisioning it. When I say FREEDOM....DO you picture MORMONISM???????? Yeah Better!
If we think Romney has the answers to the problems that are in America....Then we are the epitome of sheep.
I promise you think UB, if Romney gets in, You won't be here on this site giving him big D...you'll be giving him big D
No, I am not for Ron Paul. I am sadly for taking the lesser of the evil, Obama. So far, shit has unglued.
Hands down, Paul is the more intelligent then Romney and Obama put together, literally. I'd rather have a DR or a Lawyer for President, than a Mormon, or a religious zealot.
No I am not racist, but I am against religious zealots who use religion to get into positions of power for their own interest. Romney is the biggest friend Special Interest groups have ever known. Special Interest sound like freedom??????
We are 1 step away from literally becoming the modern Nazi Germany....and you want a Mormon zealot to lead us out???
No, you don't have to respond UB. I am no longer interested in reading anything you have to say, not that I was before. You have managed quite the troll like persona in this community.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i'm sorry, are you trying to put a religious test on who can become president?
as much as if ind mormons to be....quite interesting in their beliefs...i would never hold it against someone unless they were out there preaching about it. but rmoney wisely keeps his religion tucked away.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
I try to say to each his/her own on religion, but the Mormon religion leaves me confused as to their believes on people of color...don't get me wrong I have problems with all religions, but Joseph Smith was a great con-man telling shit that can be proved untrue and Brigham Young believe that race mixing was punishable by death. Hell magic underwear, reading stones in a hat...ok
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i think it took mormons until 1978 to let black people in their churchI try to say to each his/her own on religion, but the Mormon religion leaves me confused as to their believes on people of color...don't get me wrong I have problems with all religions, but Joseph Smith was a great con-man telling shit that can be proved untrue and Brigham Young believe that race mixing was punishable by death. Hell magic underwear, reading stones in a hat...ok
romney never once made a peep about this, he was pretty ok with it even as a 30 year old man.
profiles in courage.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
I'm sorry but that does become a problem for me...Did he not give a shit load of dough to the church and also was he not a high-ranking member. Sorry these things are something I do find difficult to ignore.i think it took mormons until 1978 to let black people in their church
romney never once made a peep about this, he was pretty ok with it even as a 30 year old man.
profiles in courage.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
the history means something to me as far as making a judgment on his character, the fact that he is a mormon itself is not and should not be a barrier to entry for the nomination.
so as much as i am disgusted that a 30 year old man never made a peep about his church disallowing blacks, and as much as i am disgusted that the same man 30 years later sent a whole bunch of money to his church so they could go fight the threat of gay marriage in california, they are just reflections on his character (lack thereof, more specifically) rather than an automatic disqualifier for office.
Nice Ol Bud
Well-Known Member
-
- 5-31-09 <3
ME & UB <3
-
InCognition
Active Member
Face it, it's a win-win-win regardless of who gets in.
If Romney wins, the country is one step closer to collapse.
If Obama wins, the country is still on it's steady pace to collapse.
If Ron Paul wins, the country has a greater chance in correcting itself, but likely will not correct itself, resulting in the US's destiny of collapse.
Romney and Obama are bringing huge fucking cans of gasoline to the fire. Paul is bringing an industrial sized fire extinguisher to the fire, but the fire is so fucking big already, it won't matter.
I think i'll just toast some marshmellows over this fire, nice and crispy.
If Romney wins, the country is one step closer to collapse.
If Obama wins, the country is still on it's steady pace to collapse.
If Ron Paul wins, the country has a greater chance in correcting itself, but likely will not correct itself, resulting in the US's destiny of collapse.
Romney and Obama are bringing huge fucking cans of gasoline to the fire. Paul is bringing an industrial sized fire extinguisher to the fire, but the fire is so fucking big already, it won't matter.
I think i'll just toast some marshmellows over this fire, nice and crispy.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
ctwalrus
Active Member
fools!
romney might have a magic number of bound delegates
what you dont understand is that some of those bound delegates SUPPORT ron paul.
what this means is come the convention when the delegates vote, the ones supporting paul but bound to romney simply dont vote.
when no one comes up with this magic number because of this..... all bets are off and it becomes a brokered convention where no one is bound
then the delegates can vote for who they support.
this is pauls strategy
romney might have a magic number of bound delegates
what you dont understand is that some of those bound delegates SUPPORT ron paul.
what this means is come the convention when the delegates vote, the ones supporting paul but bound to romney simply dont vote.
when no one comes up with this magic number because of this..... all bets are off and it becomes a brokered convention where no one is bound
then the delegates can vote for who they support.
this is pauls strategy
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
lol, have fun losing with that strategy.
150~ delegates will not a candidate nominate.
on a side note, i love how old mcronald worshippers try to win over voters: "wake up! you brainwashed fool! and vote for rawn pawl."
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Ello, poppet.
MixedMelodyMindBender
Active Member
Good god Uncle Buck you just as shot as the ron paul freaks. I think you would do a better job supporting him by washing his balls for him then to act like a mutual minded supporter. Your not 1 bit different than the ron paul freaks who think some person can fix all the problems of this country.
Obama offered Change. He Changed. Shit.
Romney offeres to restore America. AKA. Change.
In politics, Change is rhetorical. It means 1 thing. NoTHING.
Nothing will change. A white man said he could do it, then a black man, and now a mormon. They all equal the same equation. Rhetorical political bullshit to capitalize your way into Power.
Yes I do look as a persons religious views when considering a presidential nominee. Religious views, especially in politics, tends to dictate their views in life. Of which, most are askewed from all reality. He can have it tucked in, but he still puts it first and foremost in his decision making. Which is not far off from that of from the last mormon idiot who thought he too would make a good president.
Obama offered Change. He Changed. Shit.
Romney offeres to restore America. AKA. Change.
In politics, Change is rhetorical. It means 1 thing. NoTHING.
Nothing will change. A white man said he could do it, then a black man, and now a mormon. They all equal the same equation. Rhetorical political bullshit to capitalize your way into Power.
Yes I do look as a persons religious views when considering a presidential nominee. Religious views, especially in politics, tends to dictate their views in life. Of which, most are askewed from all reality. He can have it tucked in, but he still puts it first and foremost in his decision making. Which is not far off from that of from the last mormon idiot who thought he too would make a good president.
lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
you're an idiot.lol, have fun losing with that strategy.
150~ delegates will not a candidate nominate.
on a side note, i love how old mcronald worshippers try to win over voters: "wake up! you brainwashed fool! and vote for rawn pawl."
londonfog
Well-Known Member
Actually I think Obama has changed a lot..sorry you hate him so much. I have a oldest daughter that is about to start 'grad school". I'm happy as fuck that I can retain her on our healthcare...also I like that people with pre-existing conditions no longer have to worry about being denied coverage. My wife is an RN she swears that free preventive care such as mammograms and colonoscopies are very useful in saving lives and saving money down the road. I could go on and on about the parts of the Affordable Healthcare Act I like.
Being retired military I was glad in seeing the wasteful, foolish war in Iraq come to an end. Obama said he would end it and he did. The very reason I signed out was due to that BS. Hey he also changed Osama to alive to Dead...AwEsOmE...I also like the draw down in Afghanistan ( but faster please). Time for our troops to come home.
Great decision he made on GM, that one definitely save some jobs. I enjoy the credit card reform that was made. Hell nothing worst then seeing your interest rate increase or seeing banks prey on our young college kids. I have a working wifey and I'm glad as hell for the "Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act". I want her to be free and able to make as much pay as the next MAN..lol...Look at me just rambling on and on about all the wonderful changes President Obama has made. Do tell again why you say he has made no changes....and who you think could make the change you so desire... and what are those changes might I ask.
MixedMelodyMindBender
Active Member
I don't hate anything or anyone. For some reason you made that deduction from your own assumption. I strongly dislike his word as his bond. I dislike the fact that he lived up to his grease ball lawyer status that he is. He's a greasy lawyer, who lies alot. That, will not, nor has it ever, brought any positive change, to America.
I greatly disagree with pulling out of the middle east. Us, with the Coalition forces are making the same mistakes from the first desert storm. We are wasting, time, money, treasure, and allies pulling out 3/4 of the way from a job. The taliban of Afghanistan ( and I say this as a 12 month veteran of Kandahar, Afghanistan with the 10th MTN DIV. Ft. Drum) don't stand a chance of defending themself, nor does the Afghan Army ( whom smokes more hashish than anyone in America). If we are expecting to just up and leave and they can keep Al-Qaeda from retaking the country, we are sadly, sadly mistaken, and as utterly foolish as the world looks at us to be
Obama, was handed this war. People believe we shouldn't be fighting any of these wars, but thats because Americans would rather spend there money on Cable TV and BMW's then actually get up off their dead ass' and help the world out. Place like Afghanistan will need us their for a very very long time, like it or not. Its the only country that just can not keep Al-Qaeda out of their home, and as long as Coalition Forces are not their, AL-Qaeda will do what it has always done.
I deeply hate to speculate like this, but Americans need to realize that if we think that 9-11 is the worse that Al-Qaeda has to offer, we are fooling ourselves again. 9-11 happened because we believed it never would. If we are leaving Afghanistan thinking Al-Qaeda is finished, 9-11 will be second to a new national tragedy.
I did not vote for Obama, I expected zero change from him, he's a lawyer. Do you expect change from a lawyer? Change back from your retainer maybe, but I don't logically expect a lawyer to change shit as a president.
Change, was his slogan...I was not insisting he "offered" change.
NDAA, take the time to read it, and let me know if thats whom you want as the Commander in Chief when shit hits the fan. Which leaving Afghanistan, its a PROMISE . Its an invitation to our enemies.