I Have A ? For You Religious People.

OregonMeds

Well-Known Member
Guess what happens if you don't teach children to believe in Santa Claus.
They don't believe in him.

Can you guess what happens if you don't teach them to believe in God?

If God makes them, why doesn't he instill the belief in them from the beginning?
Atheism doesn't convert. It's the natural state.

No indoctrination needed.
Actually this isn't true. It's human nature to believe without any indoctrination in some form of some god and that's evidenced by historical facts that almost every group of people that have ever lived of any size from a few men in a tribe to an empire they all made up a god of one kind or another.

People fall into that trap as easily as a fly sticks to flypaper because it is our nature to feel like there must be more or there must be a reason or there must be order we just don't see it or understand it or whatever.

You have to be either educated out of it or reason your own way out of that natural trap fairly early on in life.
 
P

PadawanBater

Guest
I think it's a little bit of both.

Sometime in the beginning, when ancient man started wondering these things about existence, he thought up the concept of "God". From then on it's mostly been indoctrination since birth for the majority of people.


---------------------------------------------
I started smoking right about here... lol

---------------------------------------------

You live in America, chances are you're going to be Christian, Middle East/North/East Africa - Muslim, etc..


People push this stuff on us our whole lives, since the beginning, before we're old enough to know how to think about them. Just like how there are age restrictions for children on certain things because their minds aren't capable of understanding them correctly. Religion is exactly the same way.


Then there's that void from the human condition. The want to know. Curiosity, that keeps us asking how we got here or where we're going. An intelligent person knows that they do not know all things. They know when to admit it and attempt to learn.


So the natural curiosity we have is there, that's for sure, but the reason we place "God" into the equation is because our ancestors and all of our history tells us it's true, they thought it was true based on principles that were not designed to determine if something in the real world is true or not, so we can determine that since they started off with a false premise, the accuracy of the conclusion we see, that is religion worldwide, is not necessarily correct, simply because of that. Believers ask me "you don't believe in God? You really think 6 billion people could be wrong?" --- YES! Absolutely, 6 billion people could be wrong about religion. The numbers mean nothing.
 

morgentaler

Well-Known Member
Actually this isn't true. It's human nature to believe without any indoctrination in some form of some god and that's evidenced by historical facts that almost every group of people that have ever lived of any size from a few men in a tribe to an empire they all made up a god of one kind or another.
No, it's human nature for a child, during its formative years, to accept the things it is taught by adults. Dawkins addresses this with the example of a child told by its parents "Do not go to the waters edge or the crocodile will eat you."
If the child was a purely rational (but not necessarily wise) being it may attempt to test this statement.

Superstition, not reliant on any deities, is also present naturally. The superstitious organism is able to quickly establish cause/effect relationships, but with simple reinforcement rather than deductive reasoning.

[youtube]f15PNrk94kg[/youtube]
 

morgentaler

Well-Known Member

Then there's that void from the human condition. The want to know. Curiosity, that keeps us asking how we got here or where we're going. An intelligent person knows that they do not know all things. They know when to admit it and attempt to learn.
If you want answers that make you continually question the way the world works, you turn to science.

If you want answers that demand you not question them, you turn to religion.
 

OregonMeds

Well-Known Member
No, it's human nature for a child, during its formative years, to accept the things it is taught by adults. Dawkins addresses this with the example of a child told by its parents "Do not go to the waters edge or the crocodile will eat you."
If the child was a purely rational (but not necessarily wise) being it may attempt to test this statement.

Superstition, not reliant on any deities, is also present naturally. The superstitious organism is able to quickly establish cause/effect relationships, but with simple reinforcement rather than deductive reasoning.

[youtube]f15PNrk94kg[/youtube]
Doesn't your second paragraph explain my position though? Every human that ever walked the planet attributed things he couldn't comprehend like weather and wind and disease etc to gods... Being naturally superstitious is the same as being naturally prone to believe in gods I think.
 

Brazko

Well-Known Member
Doesn't your second paragraph explain my position though? Every human that ever walked the planet attributed things he couldn't comprehend like weather and wind and disease etc to gods... Being naturally superstitious is the same as being naturally prone to believe in gods I think.
Yes, this is why the Organized Scheme, Works... I think it's part of our minds natural evolution to recognize and associate a connectedness to the universe outside of what we recognize with our 5 senses... This isn't why religion is bad, this is how intelligent men of the time recognized the power of this phenomenom and have used it to enslave the masses... The Religion/Superstiton is a natural necessity in how we evolve.., We wouldn't even have science if we didn't question who we are and what our role in life was, It's been a continual evolution of consciousness...That's all Religion is, The REst is what it is, it doesn't matter how you try to label the Organiziation behind it(religion, political, goverment, the person, etc.. etc..) and that is usually who it comes down to, the people placed in positions of authority..

but that's just the way I see things :roll:
 

Brazko

Well-Known Member
I believed in a Literal Space God, but always questioned and tried to wrap my brains around how such a being could exist.... I was able to believe this because as a child I felt a connection to nature and the world around me.. One day when I was actually listening to the preacher, I was like.., WoW.. that's what I've been feeling and the rest is history.. But it takes more than just accepting that, as I stated before, I wanted to understand the Truth about what I was feeling and just didn't settle...
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Almost all religion we use today originated before science. Yes, it is "natural" for humans to fill in the gaps of information with "something".

That doesn't mean we are born with it. as I have posted many times, one could just as easily raise children with Dr. Suess or the Brothers Grimm, and get the same moral lessons. No religious boogey man is necessary.

Science has freed us from the myth.... it's just that man for all his wondrous technological advances, is still quite primitive.

Most cannot let go of the myths.
 

morgentaler

Well-Known Member
Doesn't your second paragraph explain my position though? Every human that ever walked the planet attributed things he couldn't comprehend like weather and wind and disease etc to gods... Being naturally superstitious is the same as being naturally prone to believe in gods I think.
It's not. A cause/effect relationship does not directly extrapolate to god.
If you're a seagull, and you drop a shell on a rock and it pops open, the ability to establish a cause/effect relationship in one instance is beneficial. Of course, if you show the seagull that if it stands on one leg clam meat will fall into a feeder in front of it, it will pick up on that too. Which isn't exactly beneficial if it spends all day standing around on one foot hoping for food instead of looking for it.

Superstition doesn't require a god in the slightest. Unless you're assuming that pigeons have their own Jesus sitting about somewhere :)

Gods are not inherent, they are trained. There are cultures with creation myths that don't involve gods, but are just interactions between natural creatures. "How the elephant got it's trunk" is the interaction between the elephant and a crocodile.

If you raise a child without religion but also without dismissing religion, you don't get an automatically religious child.

My parents gave me a children's bible to read. They also gave me Greco-Roman and Norse legends. I had as much chance coming out of that encounter with literature a follower of Thor as of Yahweh. But they were just stories.

Nobody told me I was supposed to believe them. Therefore I was not indoctrinated in it.

Though if you can show me a study that shows belief in Gods (not raw superstitious belief) is inherent, and therefore must be unlearned, I will concede. I'm a sucker for proofs :)
 

Brazko

Well-Known Member
Almost all religion we use today originated before science. Yes, it is "natural" for humans to fill in the gaps of information with "something".

That doesn't mean we are born with it. as I have posted many times, one could just as easily raise children with Dr. Suess or the Brothers Grimm, and get the same moral lessons. No religious boogey man is necessary.

Science has freed us from the myth.... it's just that man for all his wondrous technological advances, is still quite primitive.

Most cannot let go of the myths.
Yes, CJ, that's exactly what I'm saying, we are not born with knowing God, as the word could of easily been the Almighty Poop Stain..., We would've connected our being to Poop Stain if that was how we were directed, but we would believe in Poop Stain b/c we had a unknown sense of being connected to the rest of nature.. It just that the Wise or Cunning would be leading..

anyhow, I think we are coming to the same conclusion, we just sit on different sides of the aisle... and express it differently
 

CrackerJax

New Member
I just realize that no matter what side of the aisle anyone is on.... there is no "word".
No supernatural "word" anyway...... it's all man made.
 

Brazko

Well-Known Member
Yes, the same point I'm making.., But we have to use some Word to Refer to a described meaning.. Correct it has nothing to do with an aisle, just what a person chooses to relegate as the meaning. I can understand the meaning of God/god, simply by listening and understanding the person, whether it be a Scientist or the Pope.. It's nothing supernatural in the Act of doing so...
 

OregonMeds

Well-Known Member
It's not. A cause/effect relationship does not directly extrapolate to god.
If you're a seagull, and you drop a shell on a rock and it pops open, the ability to establish a cause/effect relationship in one instance is beneficial. Of course, if you show the seagull that if it stands on one leg clam meat will fall into a feeder in front of it, it will pick up on that too. Which isn't exactly beneficial if it spends all day standing around on one foot hoping for food instead of looking for it.

Superstition doesn't require a god in the slightest. Unless you're assuming that pigeons have their own Jesus sitting about somewhere :)

Gods are not inherent, they are trained. There are cultures with creation myths that don't involve gods, but are just interactions between natural creatures. "How the elephant got it's trunk" is the interaction between the elephant and a crocodile.

If you raise a child without religion but also without dismissing religion, you don't get an automatically religious child.

My parents gave me a children's bible to read. They also gave me Greco-Roman and Norse legends. I had as much chance coming out of that encounter with literature a follower of Thor as of Yahweh. But they were just stories.

Nobody told me I was supposed to believe them. Therefore I was not indoctrinated in it.

Though if you can show me a study that shows belief in Gods (not raw superstitious belief) is inherent, and therefore must be unlearned, I will concede. I'm a sucker for proofs :)
Well I don't buy the whole superstitious pigeon thing either it's also human nature to assign our emotions and feelings to animals rather than trying to understand what's really going on. The birds have an internal clock far better than ours and know much more accurately than we would when it's close to feeding time. Maybe they just dance because they're anticipating the food and exited, not because there's any superstition that the food dance actually does anything. My dogs anticipate people coming home at certain times and get all wound up in anticipation, watching the door like hawks maybe pacing around a bit or something. It doesn't mean they think watching the door and pacing around makes us come home. If they did think that all they'd ever do when we're gone is pace around and watch the door all day and that just doesn't happen.
 

mexiblunt

Well-Known Member
There is some really good experiments done with dogs in this nature. The one I saw was on discovery or tlc a few years ago. They took the internal clock, the sound of the vehicle, the anticipation of houshold members etc. out of the equation.

What they did was had someone from the research team notify the owner every day when to go home from work in real time at random times every day. At the time the person was told to go home they were given a different mode and route every time. A camera was set up in the home to watch when the dog would go jump at the door or window. The dog usually got excited and did this at the time the owner was notified it was time to go home.
 

Stoney McFried

Well-Known Member
Thanks.To be honest though, I'm never sure where you're coming from.One minute you sound like an atheist, the next you don't.If you're being sarcastic in some of your posts, forgive me because it's hard to tell on the net.
Just my humble opinion, but I think that's briliant, and probably the most well founded argument against the christain church I've heard on this thread. Thanks. :peace:
Baptists.Oh what fun they aren't,lol.All you really have to ask anyone, preacher, religious nut, etc,who tells YOU what gawd thinks or wants, is "How do YOU know?Has God spoken to you personally?" And watch them backpedal.I'd be fine with folks wanting to believe,as long as they don't:
1. Arrogantly assume everyone else feels the exact same way.
2.Try to dictate my actions or the actions of others based on their own personal belief system.
3.Brainwash young children into feeling shame or guilt for doing things that are completely natural, even in the animal kingdom.Monkeys and dolphins masturbate.Hell, my pet bird masturbates on one of his toys because his female isn't interested in sex.One day I caught her kissing him as he merrily fucked the shit out of said toy.Kinky birds.

Like I've said before, I was raised as a Jehovah's Witness.And they're not even the most loony of the Christians,trust me.But I was taught by a well meaning parent to feel shame about the sex act.Coupled with being molested as a young child by an older child, I had a lot of issues I had to work through as an adult.Shame and guilt are powerful tools of control,and that's why I get so pissed when religious people start in.I tend to get angry mostly at Christians, because I've never had a Buddhist,Wiccan,Hindu, etc,come over and preach their faith at me or to my loved ones.It's mostly the Christians who are in your face ramming their big fat throbbing Christ down your throat.
Knowing what shame and guilt can do to a person,I tend to get pissy when folks try to tell others what to be ashamed of. The only thing anyone should be ashamed of is harming another without good reason.That's it.Dishonesty isn't good either, but sometimes a lie can be a good thing, if it comes about as a means to avoid harming someone,and it doesn't have an impact on others in a detrimental way.
The sexual shame thing, the only reason I can figure it came about was because it's an easy way for the church to have a hand in ensuring an influx of new members who can be easily and readily assimilated.And celibate clergy members are so sexually repressed and frustrated that they are simply fascinated with the details of the entire act.They really just wanted to make it as unenjoyable for others as possible while still ensuring people did in fact procreate. Hence the Catholic church frowning on birth control....how else will they keep the church and its coffers growing?And since devoutly religious(read:brainwashed) parents tend to pass their beliefs on down to the kids,the institution of marriage is used to: 1.Attempt to ensure that both parents are of the same faith, thereby increasing the likelihood that any issue born of the marriage is immediately indoctrinated into the faith from birth.
2:Control and manipulate the sexual activities of its members.This is because the need to reproduce is born into us.If we are taught to second guess the instincts that lie at the very core of us,we are compromised on many levels.If we feel guilt for sexual feelings or actions, (and I'm talking normal ones here, not aberrations like rape,etc.),which most of us have on a daily basis,we can be manipulated into:a.procreating only within a "sanctified" union (which accomplishes what I said above on 1.),and b:feeling sinful, dirty, and unworthy,lowering our self esteem and making us easier to control,by making us feel we deserve it. The entire purpose of confession is to keep you feeling guilty,to give you a repetitive, meaningless penance such as a Hail Mary to occupy your mind so you won't actually think too much,and to give the priest a little thrill by being a voyeur into your private thoughts and feelings so he can pass judgement upon them and also gain insight into how to control the individual better.
The sad thing is,many people will believe in something without examining it too closely because it saves them the trouble of thinking.:peace:
I wish you could come and speak at my mothers church. It's Baptist. They will tell you what you can and can't do with your naughty parts. Masterbation is a great subject for guilting some teen age boy or girl into submission. The pastor, imho, is a big child and uses the power he enjoys to bolster his fragile ego. He teaches about a god that I don't recognise, especially when he uses the Bible to support his vile attmpt to bring the congregation further under his control.

The bold part, very moving. Maybe because I've said the same thing. I was taught about a god that only seemed to care about how good I looked to "outsiders". Very self focused. When I got tired of thinking about myself so much I was confronted because you can't tell christians to start thinking about others more than themselves. It's all about their "good" whiteness, right? Got to protect god's image, because he can't seem to do it himself.


"For me, all things are permissible, but not all things are beneficial. For me, all things are permissible, but I will be mastered by nothing!"

That is a Bible verse that makes scene to me. Life was made for us to enjoy, so be free! And, it is wise to keep in mind that there are unbeneficial things that can take mastery over us. What those things are can only be decided by the individual. Say that to a christian and they'll try to shove you back into one of their boxes. If that doesn't work, then "to hell with you" is the only option. This is my long winded way of agreeing with you that religion breeds lazy minds.
 

OregonMeds

Well-Known Member
"Christians who are in your face ramming their big fat throbbing Christ down your throat."

Hahaha funny stuff, two thumbs up for that one!
 
Top