Hunter-Gazi: Giuliani and Russian propaganda scam to help Trump get re-eelcted.

schuylaar said:

what about getting your employees to donate from your very large company then give it back as a bonus at the end of the year?

talk about scammers.

Click to expand...

https://www.rollitup.org/t/surprise-hunter-bidens-art-dealer-has-ties-to-china.1058957/

Click to expand...

hanimmal said:

LMAO the right wing propaganda trolls are really getting desperate that they are willing to cling to some dick head who 'wants' to be a big deal pushing spoiled (I was going to put 'spoiled rich' kid, but Biden was never rich until he left office after being VP) kid art.



I also have to just shake my head at the troll's plugging of the right wing hate monger's boogey man of a Chinese, Jewish, and Iranian guys' names.

Click to expand...

The Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney in Delaware is nearing a critical juncture in his decision of whether to prosecute Joe Biden's son.

"First on CNN, federal investigators are reaching a critical decision point on whether or not to charge the president's son, Hunter Biden," Jake Tapper reported. "Sources tell CNN no final decision has yet been made, but charges could include alleged tax violations and lying about buying a gun when he technically was not allowed to because of his acknowledged struggle with drug addiction."

"The case is being investigated by the U.S. Attorney in Delaware, who was appointed by President Trump, and President Biden did not replace that U.S. Attorney because of this investigation," Tapper added.

READ: Jan. 6 committee reveals new details about Secret Service deleting critical evidence

Tapper asked CNN's Kara Scannell to explain her latest reporting on the investigation.

"Well Jake, one factor prosecutors are confronting is the midterm elections," Scannell explained. "There are Justice Department guidelines about bringing any politically sensitive cases around an election. those guidelines include things such as taking any sort of overt steps like an indictment or executing of a search warrant, anything perceived as putting a thumb on the scale, they try to avoid that."

"Current and former Justice Department officials say that deadline is effectively 60 days before the election," she reported. "So that implies there could be a decision soon about what steps they want to take, or they could decide to wait until after the elections in November."

READ: Witness Garrett Ziegler lashes out at J6 committee in white nationalist grievance rant

Friday, Sept. 9, is the 60th day before the 2022 midterm election.

Watch below or at this link.

Click to expand...

hanimmal said:

Because you said so? It is interesting how the FBI don't normally announce anything in a ongoing investigation, fine I will google it to see how full of shit your statement is...

View attachment 4721676

Not surprising not one credible link saying this in the top results.

So I checked AP news:
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-russia-024b553e9a4ffb2716286dd134876f8a
View attachment 4721677

Seems that the only real news is still that Trump is working through his criminal lawyer again with the Russian military to manufacture dirt for his troll army (foreign and domestic) to spread around online.


It does make me curious if the FBI investigation (assuming there is one that was 'purported' around this laptop is actually on Giuliani though. How is their buddies Lev and Igor doing?
View attachment 4721678

Click to expand...

hanimmal said:

Looks like Rupert Murdoch is trying really hard to spin up some anti-Biden (even if it is the wrong one) propaganda.

OK then. Biden 2020.

I brought it up in response to your stupid meme that snowflakes about Biden calling out the insurrection supporters not being supporters of police. Ok? And what does that have to do with Biden? You trolled something about when he was going to force oil companies to start producing more...

www.rollitup.org

View attachment 5171157View attachment 5171158

I'm sure it is just a coincidence that the new troll is pretending like it is the biggest story since 'but her emails'. While ignoring the Secret Service trolling congress with their deleted texts and then massive dump, or the joke that was Trump's answer to Mueller's highly successful (and fully paid for thanks to Manafort's asset seizures and ended up prosecuting a lot of Trump's minions) 'Durham Report' that ended with jack shit.

https://www.rollitup.org/t/ok-then-biden-2020.994745/post-17024634
View attachment 5171171

Click to expand...

Federal agents investigating President Biden’s son Hunter have gathered what they believe is sufficient evidence to charge him with tax crimes and a false statement related to a gun purchase, according to people familiar with the case. The next step is for the U.S. Attorney in Delaware, a Trump administration holdover, to decide on whether to file such charges, these people said.

The investigation into Hunter Biden began in 2018, and became a central focus for then-president Donald Trump during his unsuccessful 2020 reelection effort. Initially, the investigation centered around Hunter Biden’s finances related to overseas business ties and consulting work. Over time, investigators with multiple agencies focused closely on whether he did not report all of his income, and whether he lied on gun purchase paperwork in 2018, according to the people familiar with the situation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing case.

Agents determined months ago they had assembled a viable criminal case against the younger Biden. But it is ultimately up to prosecutors at the Justice Department, not agents, to decide whether to file charges in cases where prosecutors believe the evidence is strong enough to lead to a likely conviction at trial.

Given the intense political interest in a criminal probe involving the son of a sitting president, Attorney General Merrick Garland has made clear that the U.S. Attorney in Delaware, David C. Weiss, who was nominated by Trump in late 2017, is supervising the case.

Garland has vowed there will be no political or otherwise improper interference in the Hunter Biden case, and has not moved to push Weiss to make a decision, the people familiar with the matter said. It is not uncommon for Justice Department investigations to take years to finish. Justice Department policy would require any criminal tax charges to be approved by the department’s tax division.

A spokeswoman for Weiss declined to comment, as did spokespeople for the Justice Department, and the FBI and the IRS, the two primary investigative agencies.

Asked about the case, Chris Clark, a lawyer for Hunter Biden, accused investigators of leaking information. “It is a federal felony for a federal agent to leak information about a Grand Jury investigation such as this one,” Clark said in a written statement. "Any agent you cite as a source in your article apparently has committed such a felony. We expect the Department of Justice will diligently investigate and prosecute such bad actors. As is proper and legally required, we believe the prosecutors in this case are diligently and thoroughly weighing not just evidence provided by agents, but also all the other witnesses in this case, including witnesses for the defense. That is the job of the prosecutors. They should not be pressured, rushed, or criticized for doing their job.”

Inside Hunter Biden's multi-million-dollar deals with a Chinese energy company

Any charging decision involving the Biden case is especially fraught because Trump and his allies have made accusations of corruption in Hunter Biden’s business dealings a key line of attack against Democrats, both before and after the 2020 presidential race. At the height of the election campaign, Trump allies revealed that a Delaware computer shop owner had turned over to the FBI a laptop that had apparently belonged to Hunter Biden. Trump and others argued the data on the laptop showed evidence of unethical and possible illegal business deals; Joe Biden and his supporters denounced the efforts as a smear.

In March, The Washington Post reported that two computer security experts had reviewed thousands of the emails purportedly from Hunter Biden’s computer and found they were authentic communications, based on cryptographic signatures from Google and other technology companies. It could not be determined for this article whether the laptop and its contents were useful in the Justice Department investigation.

The Biden probe has proceeded with relatively little fanfare in recent months amid the much larger and more public Justice Department and FBI investigation into whether Trump mishandled classified material at Mar-a-Lago — and a separate federal investigation into efforts to overturn the 2020 election results.Trump and his allies have sharply criticized federal law enforcement over both those cases.

Questions about the younger Biden’s foreign business ventures have long dogged his father’s political life. Trump and his GOP allies specifically cite as ethical conflicts Hunter Biden’s past work for a Ukrainian gas company while his father was vice president, as well as his China-related business affairs. In a July 2019 phone call, Trump urged Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate both Joe and Hunter Biden — part of a pressure campaign that led to the first of Trump’s two impeachment trials in Congress.

In December 2020 federal agents sought to interview the younger Biden, leading him to publicly acknowledge that he was under investigation. “I take this matter very seriously but I am confident that a professional and objective review of these matters will demonstrate that I handled my affairs legally and appropriately, including with the benefit of professional tax advisors,” Hunter Biden said in a statement at that time.

Clark, Hunter Biden’s lawyer, said in his statement Thursday that he has “had no contact whatsoever with any federal investigative agent.
Therefore, a rendition of the case from such an ‘agent’ is inherently biased, one-sided, and inaccurate. It is regrettable that law enforcement agents appear to be violating the law to prejudice a case against a person who is a target simply because of his family name.”

Republicans have pressed the Biden administration to appoint a special counsel to take over the investigation into the president’s son, arguing the step was needed to ensure public confidence in the probe’s outcome. Under Justice Department regulations, any special counsel would still answer to the attorney general, however. Garland chose not to make such an appointment, instead keeping the case with Weiss, whose previous career as a federal prosecutor stretches back decades and includes violent crime and white-collar cases.

In the early days of the Biden administration, a Justice Department official said removing Weiss as U.S. Attorney as he was overseeing the Hunter Biden case would likely spark significant political backlash.

In April, after White House chief of staff Ron Klain said Biden “is confident that his son didn’t break the law,” Garland was asked at a Senate hearing about how the Justice Department is handling the case.

Weiss “is in charge of that investigation. There will not be interference of any political or improper kind,” Garland answered. “We put the investigation in the hands of a Trump appointee from the previous administration.”

The primary focus of the tax investigation has been whether Hunter Biden did not declare income related to his various business ventures, including overseas. The gun paperwork part of the investigation stems from 2018, a time period in which Hunter Biden, by his own account, was smoking crack cocaine.

In October of that year, Biden purchased a handgun, filling out a federal form in which he allegedly answered “no” to the question whether he was “an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?”

According to a book Hunter Biden later wrote about his struggles with substance abuse, he was using drugs heavily that year.

Prosecutions for false statements on gun-purchase forms are relatively rare, but they do happen. Federal agents refer to such cases as “lying and buying.” Historically, prosecutors have significant discretion to decide which ones are worth federal resources.

“A prosecutor can say they have bigger fish to catch, or they can decide to seek a deal,” said Joseph G. Green, a retired agent from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. “As agents, we would always include as many charges as we could, but it’s ultimately up to the prosecutor to decide which ones they will bring.”

Click to expand...

hanimmal said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/06/hunter-biden-tax-gun-charges/View attachment 5208773

Click to expand...

DIY-HP-LED said:

But what about his second amendment rights! The NRA will be up in arms! And taxes are slavery!

Click to expand...

Roger A. Shrubber said:

i find the timing of this to be highly suspicious...i'd like to know exactly who made the decision about when to make this press statement...and if this comes out a wash, Hunter should be filing some big ass lawsuits, like 100s of millions big
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-tax-gun-purchase-evidence-fbi-us-attorney/

Click to expand...

DIY-HP-LED said:

A month before the election, the DOJ does not leak this shit under Garland unless there is a MAGAT buried there, they will be looking into the leak. Trump isn't running and they won't touch him before the election, though I figure there are other reasons for that, and it's just an excuse to keep him around for a while.

So how much FBI shoe leather was worn out over these misdemeanors, something covered by a fine most likely. If they go after Hunter for taxes, Trump will be in even more trouble, as will his kids, serious criminal trouble. What's next, they bust Hunter for ripping the tag off his mattress? Gee I wonder who started this whole FBI investigation and when, during the Trump administration?

Click to expand...

cannabineer said:

I read it as a signal that their activity is not (any longer) partisan.

Click to expand...

cannabineer said:

I read it as a signal that their activity is not (any longer) partisan.

Click to expand...

DIY-HP-LED said:

These are minor crimes that had a Helluva lot of federal focus on them, unusual to say the least. If you investigate most people intensively, you will find something in their past. He is probably guilty of apparently minor (crimes?) or misdemeanors, but why was he investigated to begin with? Not many people get brow beaten by the FBI, not even Trump's kids, until recently perhaps and for good cause! Nobody investigated Trump before he was elected, and he was a public criminal for years. I see crimes testified to in hearings they apparently don't bother to follow up on FFS.

Click to expand...