ASCIIGHOST
Well-Known Member
I know a black chick who only dates white guys. Had 1 kid and I doubt any abortions. She was to into coke for me though. That shit gets people violent.
How do you feel about America bombing a hospital?
- Thread starter Clockboy Orange
- Start date
Darth Vapour
Well-Known Member
chesus thanks to wiki leaks eh
Thus, the history of the Bush administration’s approach toward Syria is important to understand. Shortly after 9/11, former NATO Commander Wesley Clark learned from a Pentagon source that Syria was on the same hit list as Iraq. As Clark recalled, the Bush administration “wanted us to destabilize the Middle East, turn it upside down, make it under our control.”
Sure enough, in a May 2002 speech titled “Beyond the Axis of Evil,” Under Secretary of State John Bolton named Syria as one of a handful of “rogue states” along with Iraq that “can expect to become our targets.” Assad’s conciliatory and cooperative gestures were brushed aside.
The Assad regime received no credit from President Bush or Vice President Dick Cheney for becoming what scholar Kilic Bugra Kanat has called “one of the CIA’s most effective intelligence allies in the fight against terrorism.” Not only did the regime provide life-saving intelligence on planned al-Qaeda attacks, it did the CIA’s dirty work of interrogating terrorism suspects “rendered” by the United States from Afghanistan and other theaters.
Syria’s opposition to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 and its suspected involvement in the February 2005 assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri deepened the administration’s hostility toward Damascus.
Covertly, Washington began collaborating with Saudi Arabia to back Islamist opposition groups including the Muslim Brotherhood, according to journalist Seymour Hersh. One key beneficiary was said to be Abdul Halim Khaddam, a former Syrian vice president who defected to the West in 2005. In March 2006, Khaddam joined with the chief of Syria’s Muslim Brotherhood to create the National Salvation Front, with the goal of ousting Assad.
Thanks to Wikileaks, we know that key Lebanese politicians, acting in concert with Saudi leaders, urged Washington to support Khaddam as a tactic to accomplish “complete regime change in Syria” and to address “the bigger problem” of Iran.
Meanwhile, the Assad regime was striving mightily to reduce its international isolation by reaching a peace settlement with Israel. It began secret talks with Israel in 2004 in Turkey and by the following year “had reached a very advanced form and covered territorial, water, border and political questions,” according to historian Gabriel Kolko.
A host of senior Israelis, including former heads of the IDF, Shin Beit, and Foreign Ministry, backed the talks. But the Bush administration nixed them, as Egyptian President Hosni Mubarek confirmed in January 2007.
As Kolko noted, the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz then “published a series of extremely detailed accounts, including the draft accord, confirming that Syria ‘offered a far reaching and equitable peace treaty that would provide for Israel’s security and is comprehensive’ — and divorce Syria from Iran and even create a crucial distance between it and Hezbollah and Hamas.
“The Bush Administration’s role in scuttling any peace accord was decisive. C. David Welch, Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, sat in at the final meeting [and] two former senior CIA officials were present in all of these meetings and sent regular reports to Vice President Dick Cheney’s office. The press has been full of details on how the American role was decisive, because it has war, not peace, at the top of its agenda.”
Thus, the history of the Bush administration’s approach toward Syria is important to understand. Shortly after 9/11, former NATO Commander Wesley Clark learned from a Pentagon source that Syria was on the same hit list as Iraq. As Clark recalled, the Bush administration “wanted us to destabilize the Middle East, turn it upside down, make it under our control.”
Sure enough, in a May 2002 speech titled “Beyond the Axis of Evil,” Under Secretary of State John Bolton named Syria as one of a handful of “rogue states” along with Iraq that “can expect to become our targets.” Assad’s conciliatory and cooperative gestures were brushed aside.
The Assad regime received no credit from President Bush or Vice President Dick Cheney for becoming what scholar Kilic Bugra Kanat has called “one of the CIA’s most effective intelligence allies in the fight against terrorism.” Not only did the regime provide life-saving intelligence on planned al-Qaeda attacks, it did the CIA’s dirty work of interrogating terrorism suspects “rendered” by the United States from Afghanistan and other theaters.
Syria’s opposition to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 and its suspected involvement in the February 2005 assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri deepened the administration’s hostility toward Damascus.
Covertly, Washington began collaborating with Saudi Arabia to back Islamist opposition groups including the Muslim Brotherhood, according to journalist Seymour Hersh. One key beneficiary was said to be Abdul Halim Khaddam, a former Syrian vice president who defected to the West in 2005. In March 2006, Khaddam joined with the chief of Syria’s Muslim Brotherhood to create the National Salvation Front, with the goal of ousting Assad.
Thanks to Wikileaks, we know that key Lebanese politicians, acting in concert with Saudi leaders, urged Washington to support Khaddam as a tactic to accomplish “complete regime change in Syria” and to address “the bigger problem” of Iran.
Meanwhile, the Assad regime was striving mightily to reduce its international isolation by reaching a peace settlement with Israel. It began secret talks with Israel in 2004 in Turkey and by the following year “had reached a very advanced form and covered territorial, water, border and political questions,” according to historian Gabriel Kolko.
A host of senior Israelis, including former heads of the IDF, Shin Beit, and Foreign Ministry, backed the talks. But the Bush administration nixed them, as Egyptian President Hosni Mubarek confirmed in January 2007.
As Kolko noted, the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz then “published a series of extremely detailed accounts, including the draft accord, confirming that Syria ‘offered a far reaching and equitable peace treaty that would provide for Israel’s security and is comprehensive’ — and divorce Syria from Iran and even create a crucial distance between it and Hezbollah and Hamas.
“The Bush Administration’s role in scuttling any peace accord was decisive. C. David Welch, Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, sat in at the final meeting [and] two former senior CIA officials were present in all of these meetings and sent regular reports to Vice President Dick Cheney’s office. The press has been full of details on how the American role was decisive, because it has war, not peace, at the top of its agenda.”
kelly4
Well-Known Member
It wouldn't matter to this dum dum. She has said flat out she doesn't want to use birth control. She also has 3 little Obama's running around. 2 of them relate as black and 1 identifies as white.
All 3 look the same...
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Which it's an awesome point so why do most anti choice advocates also are against birth control and what percentage of PP is dedicated to it?
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Where should I move. Butfuckistan?
You going to pay for my relocation?
ASCIIGHOST
Well-Known Member
Litterally the 2nd sentence says ''I'm not suggesting you do move" Can you not read? Do you just not read? I mean its right there. Go back. The post was never edited. Everyone can see I put it, so you should be embarrassed how stupid of a response that was. A loser like you probably has no pride to being with however. I mean whats to be proud of? Some POS Mopar? Where you a high school football star too?
Darth Vapour
Well-Known Member
Anways whats your thoughts as to Merica is in big shit for the bombing of the hospital to bad its not going to get covered up this time
Also whats your thoughts of the 28 missiles russia just sent all bulls eye and do you think they send USA a message i do specially the use of there advanced missiles sure it got merica's attention specially sending them from the other sea lol
Russia's firing of 26 long-range SS-N-30A Kalibr cruise missiles from four surface ships in the Caspian Sea against 11 targets in Syria on Wednesday marks a significant escalation in President Vladimir Putin's military intervention in the Middle East.
The missiles flew almost 1,500km on a flight path that took them over Iran and Iraq before impacting in Syria.
Also whats your thoughts of the 28 missiles russia just sent all bulls eye and do you think they send USA a message i do specially the use of there advanced missiles sure it got merica's attention specially sending them from the other sea lol
Russia's firing of 26 long-range SS-N-30A Kalibr cruise missiles from four surface ships in the Caspian Sea against 11 targets in Syria on Wednesday marks a significant escalation in President Vladimir Putin's military intervention in the Middle East.
The missiles flew almost 1,500km on a flight path that took them over Iran and Iraq before impacting in Syria.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Looked cool as fuck in videos too.
ASCIIGHOST
Well-Known Member
Well as long as YOU were entertained thats whats important in life.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
If their cruise missiles are that advanced, I can only imagine what their ICBM's are like.
Darth Vapour
Well-Known Member
awe Don't think its going to wotk this time trying to blame russia Oh them SNEAKY MERICANS but whats great about it is nato , americans investigating it will mean nothing as another investigation has been launched so there will be no cover Up's meaning americn blaming another country those days are over buddy
i am just anxious when russia brings out the bigguns the elite advanced weapons there is no denying USA n NATO are biting there fngernails now
Darth Vapour
Well-Known Member
they are leap years ahead of anyone when it comes to missles remember they were the first in space american has 15 kill ton ICBms ' were Russia has 750 kilo ton just 10 of them would kill every american in 30 mins this is what the cold war was all about how USA was scared shitless of there missiles pretty sure usa Is going to be in awe soon as other advanced s systems come into play
See as america was show boating like american pageant flexxing it muscles other countries like Russia stood back in the shadow and laughed its like plying poker sorry usa you got nothing
read your cards long time ago nice bluff tho
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
They are MIRVs And all the interceptors in the world will not stop all of them
ASCIIGHOST
Well-Known Member
way to shut down the interceptor argument before it happens. all this info your leaking, epic hacks bro
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Da fuk? Where did you dredge up this stinking pile of bullshit and guesswork? Try these;
Soviet Military Power
Jane's
Wikipedia, for fucking crying out loud!
Soviets had a strategy of using excess weapons yield to ensure target destruction because their accuracy wasn't so great. This rendered hardened targets pretty safe from them, and most of our missile silos were hardened, plus NORAD, etc.
We could make weapons any size we like- and we did. Smaller weapons with better accuracy almost always work better.
At no time did the Soviets ever have anything approaching strategic superiority over the US, and claims to the contrary can always be traced back to fear mongering, often for the purpose of raising defense budgets- and therefore profits for defense contractors.
Today, the American defense budget is bigger than the world's next dozen largest military budgets... COMBINED. Why doesn't knowing this make me sleep any better?
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Because the spending isn't wholly indicative of military strength.
Remember, Russia is Communist, so Putin pays what he thinks is a fair price for advanced Russian made weaponry.
Darth Vapour
Well-Known Member
Ask your self how come even with the biggest military spending China is shortly going to pass USA in military dominence if they lready have not
Ask you self you can be stupid and spend all that money yet have your 5th gen so caalled best fighter jet parked ask your self why ISIS has all your tanks , armored vehicles and munitions and weapons that you let behind ???
Ask you r self why usa didnt stop russia from invading Ukraine ,, Ask your self why russia told USA to get the hell out of there way when they started bombing Syria
and most imoportantly ask you self why Putin just deployed an array of jets and missiles to the Middle East. But they’re not the kind of weapons he’d need to fight ISIS. They’re built for countering another major power.
Right before the bombs rained down, a Russian general arrived in Baghdad warned the U.S. military planners to keep America's own warplanes out of the way. U.S. officials said they would not alter their flight plans.
This is the beginning of a dangerous new phase of the international intervention in the Syrian civil war. Not only has Russia tried to order U.S. forces to step aside, it actually has the firepower to back up its demands. Some of the 35 warplanes Russia has deployed to Syria are specifically designed for fighting foes like the United States, not ISIS.
How things have changed now in the middle east do you think china or iran is watching reading to pounce on usa if they fuck up ???
truth is USA is shitting there pants you think them missiles sent from the other side of the ocean didn't raise some eyebrows ??? you fucking dead wrong
USA is being matched more or less being baited
Its sad when USA struggles at best and gets handed defeat by a 3rd world country let alone try to do something to a country capable of putting usa on its knees in a heartbeat
Last edited:
Darth Vapour
Well-Known Member
TRuth is presently USA aircraft are staying clear away from the russian SU30 and for good reason but i cant wait until They do encounter one and end up being dead in the skies
no matter how you shake it Russia does lead USA in missile tech and apparently has them beat in air to air combat as well In a series of aerial war games in the last decade, India’s own Su-30s have tangled with—and reportedly defeated—American and British fighters in mock combat, sparking minor controversies in both countries as their respective air forcesscrambled to explain why the Russian-made planes are superior to U.S. F-15s and British Typhoon jets.
no matter how you shake it Russia does lead USA in missile tech and apparently has them beat in air to air combat as well In a series of aerial war games in the last decade, India’s own Su-30s have tangled with—and reportedly defeated—American and British fighters in mock combat, sparking minor controversies in both countries as their respective air forcesscrambled to explain why the Russian-made planes are superior to U.S. F-15s and British Typhoon jets.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Do you have ANY citations for ANY of this?