How do I get to heaven? Answers to your questions on eternal life.

OldGrowth420

Well-Known Member
I was studying to become a preacher. There are several articles I'd written, but for the sake of remaining anonymous... I won't share them. After actually studying the Bible I was searching for answers to the incoherent stories and teachings; many of which were actually contradictory. Anyway, I'm an atheist now and I think that if everyone would actually study the Bible and I mean really STUDY and be honest with themselves about what they are reading and how it makes them feel... there would be a lot more atheists in this world.
I study, and i mean actually study the bible everyday.

If people would actually delve into the bible they would find faith in Christ and healing for their life.

If you want real joy, it's found in practicing the teachings of the Holy Bible.

I would like to know what you found and why it lead you to the decisions you have come to.

Sometimes feelings can be deceptive, Christianity is based on faith. Not feelings.

Also, I find it illogical to base your eternal life on a feeling.

Base your judgement by what comes from the experience.

Is what I am doing beneficial? Am i reaping positive benefits in my faith?

What are the pros and cons of Believing vs. Not Believing

Risks:

Why do so many people believe?

Why do scholars and scientists believe in God?

Surely they have good reasons.

What are those reasons?

These are all very important questions you need to ask yourself before you throw away your faith.
 

OldGrowth420

Well-Known Member
Romans 10:9-11
[SUP]9 [/SUP]If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. [SUP]10 [/SUP]For it is by believing in your heart that you are made right with God, and it is by confessing with your mouth that you are saved. [SUP]11 [/SUP]As the Scriptures tell us, “Anyone who trusts in him will never be disgraced.”[SUP][e[/SUP]
 

OldGrowth420

Well-Known Member
Luke 12:8-12
[SUP]8 [/SUP]“I tell you the truth, everyone who acknowledges me publicly here on earth, the Son of Man[SUP][c][/SUP] will also acknowledge in the presence of God’s angels. [SUP]9 [/SUP]But anyone who denies me here on earth will be denied before God’s angels. [SUP]10 [/SUP]Anyone who speaks against the Son of Man can be forgiven, but anyone who blasphemes the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven.



[SUP]11 [/SUP]“And when you are brought to trial in the synagogues and before rulers and authorities, don’t worry about how to defend yourself or what to say, [SUP]12 [/SUP]for the Holy Spirit will teach you at that time what needs to be said.”
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
Hey OG. Take the time to watch this short video, and let me know your thoughts on the views presented here. I think you'll find it interesting...

[video=youtube;8Eam-z1bwrk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Eam-z1bwrk[/video]
 

NietzscheKeen

Well-Known Member
I study, and i mean actually study the bible everyday.

If people would actually delve into the bible they would find faith in Christ and healing for their life.

If you want real joy, it's found in practicing the teachings of the Holy Bible.

I would like to know what you found and why it lead you to the decisions you have come to.

Sometimes feelings can be deceptive, Christianity is based on faith. Not feelings.

Also, I find it illogical to base your eternal life on a feeling.

Base your judgement, by what comes from the experience.

Is what I am doing beneficial? Am i reaping positive rewards for my faith?

What are the pros and cons of Believing vs. Not Believing

Risks:

Why do so many people believe?

Why do scholars and scientists believe in God?

Surely they have good reasons.

What are those reasons?

These are all very important questions you need to ask yourself before you throw away your faith.
Well, this is such a broad subject that it might be rather difficult to give you an answer that is as thorough and coherent as I'd like; it would just take so long and I'd wind up writing a book. I have a few questions for you before I can respond though, if you don't mind.

When you say you "study the Bible everyday", can you define "study"? When I use the word study, I am meaning to think about what it is saying and leaving apologetics out of it; reading it critically not just for memorization. I asked questions when I studied, questions such as "is this moral", "how was this miracle accomplished", and so on. When I ask "how was this miracle accomplished" I'm not asking the question "how was this trick performed" as one would after observing a illusionist. I'm asking what physical laws and properties had to change in order for this to happen. For example, when Jesus turned the water to wine... what happened to the molecules in order to be transformed... what did Jesus cause to happen at the molecular level? In Exodus, when the staff was turned into a serpant obviously the wood fibers, cellulose, and plant cells had to somehow change into animals cells. How did water gush forth from a stone?

Other questions one must ask, and many children DO indeed ask as the stories are so fantastic that they just aren't believable to someone that hasn't gained the ability to rationalize. That was my problem as a young child in sunday school. I believed the stories happened, I just wanted to know how. A prime example is Noah's Ark. I'm sure you've heard the questions before: "how did they fit all the animals onto the ark", "how did they get all of them onto the ark", "how did they keep them from killing each other", and "how did they distribute the kangaroos to Australia, the penguins to Antarctica and the alpacas to South America after landing on Mount Ararat"? These are the types of questions I asked as a kid and I KNOW I'm not the only one. Usually the type of answers I would get were "we weren't meant to know", "we will have to ask God when we get to heaven", "it's all part of his plan", "we weren't meant to understand", "we can't possibly understand God", etc. All of which were non-answers. There were a few times where I was actually scolded by a sunday school teacher and told to stop asking questions because that's what the devil wants us to do.

I've deviated from your questions a bit... I apologize. In response to your claim that if people would read the Bible, they'd all find faith in Christ. Did you know that a large percentage of people that enter seminary become atheists? That's what happens when you learn about Bible history, the obscure tales, the real nitty-gritty of it all. One thing I noticed while still a Christian, is that most Christians see religion and the Bible as a buffet; they pick the stuff the like and ignore the rest. This leads to even more contradictions. A very VERY common example is the genocide, stoning, and other immoral actions mandated in the Old Testament. People almost always say, "well when Jesus came we no longer needed the old testament. That doesn't apply anymore". Well obviously it does because the Ten Commandments are in there and I don't know any Christian that thinks we should get rid of THEM. We would also have to scrap all the prophecy that fortold of the coming of the messiah. I could give other examples, but I want to avoid being as verbose as I tend to be.

I found real joy in seeing the world as it really was. I discovered I didn't need God to explain ANYTHING and the explanations which didn't include "God" made a lot more sense than those that did. The feelings I had when I was a Christian, I feel them now as an atheist. The same feelings you get when you hear Shout to the Lord by Darlene Zschech is exactly the same feelings I get when I hear American Pie by Don McLean. With that said, I dare say that in Christianity the only reinforcement to faith is feelings. Feelings had absolutely nothing to do with me becoming atheist. I wanted to believe, I wanted to know God and his will, I prayed to him for guidance and to show me his true religion. This went on for at least a decade, probably much longer. If God wanted my trust and my devotion, why did He make it so hard to understand Him? Why did he hide? Why would he do things to confuse me and "test my faith"?

The thing I've heard from so many Christians when they ask me about my beliefs is "why would you want to believe that? I'd rather believe...". You say it's not based on feelings, but what else do Christians really have? They have hopes and desires for a better life, for cosmic justice, to see family again. These are emotional at the very core; dispair, anger, lust for revenge, lonliness, etc. Most Christians aren't even honest with themselves when it comes to what faith really is. I once heard the example, "I have faith that this chair will hold me up when I sit on it". That's equivocation; please look it up if you don't know what it means because it is important. When Christians say they have "faith" what they are really saying is the following: This story is so contradictory to what I know of the universe, it is so fantastic as to be unbelievable, but I will believe it because that is what I have to do to get into heaven. The more outrageous the story I believe, the more faith I have and I will be rewarded for it.

Do you believe in alien abductions?

If I understand right, according to the end of your post, you chose to follow Christianity because of it's perceived benefits and rewards? Don't you think God would see through that. Isn't that being a bit insincere?

To be honest, I had a career in academia for a while and I could probably count on one hand the number of people I met that believed in any god. Take the book "In Seven Days" I cannot remember the author. In this book there are many "scientists" that supposedly give evidence for God. ALL literally ALL of the evidence is junk science and I doubt so very seriously that any of the contributors are respected in their field. The funniest thing though was that most of the contributors were talking as an authority on subjects outside of their field. There was a botanist talking about geology for example. She compared deposits under bridges to stalactites in caves. "See! It doesn't take hundreds of thousands of years for stalactites to form, this bridge has them and it is only ten months old." That's not a direct quote, but a very accurate paraphrase.

No, I've never EVER met anyone that had a good reason for believing in God. Zaehet can appreciate this I'm sure, "There can't be a practical reason for believing what isn't true. [...] Either a thing is true or it isn't. If it is true you should believe it and if it isn't you shouldn't. If you can't find out whether it is true or whether it isn't you should suspend judgement. [...] It's treachery to intelluctual integrity to hold a belief because you think it's useful and not because you think it's true."

As a believer that has seen "miracles" and was pursuing a career based on my beliefs, don't you think I would have very good, logically sound reasons and have thought about it very VERY thoroughly before I throw away my faith? I spent years looking for the answers. I went to nearly every denomination that exists to talk to them hoping they could help me. Christadelphians, SDA, LDS, so on. Also I spent time with other non-traditional religions such as Eckankar, Raelians... yikes!, and the "Hare Krishnas".

Maybe that answered some of your questions. I hope you were really wanting an answer and weren't just waiting for your turn to reply to expected answers. Just one more thing that I find very interesting and important to me at least. Mother Teresa and I are a lot alike, did you know she was pretty much an atheist herself? If any of my answers didn't make sense, please let me know. I was just writing as it occured to me, so it may not always flow well.
 

OldGrowth420

Well-Known Member
Well, this is such a broad subject that it might be rather difficult to give you an answer that is as thorough and coherent as I'd like; it would just take so long and I'd wind up writing a book. I have a few questions for you before I can respond though, if you don't mind.

When you say you "study the Bible everyday", can you define "study"? When I use the word study, I am meaning to think about what it is saying and leaving apologetics out of it; reading it critically not just for memorization. I asked questions when I studied, questions such as "is this moral", "how was this miracle accomplished", and so on. When I ask "how was this miracle accomplished" I'm not asking the question "how was this trick performed" as one would after observing a illusionist. I'm asking what physical laws and properties had to change in order for this to happen. For example, when Jesus turned the water to wine... what happened to the molecules in order to be transformed... what did Jesus cause to happen at the molecular level? In Exodus, when the staff was turned into a serpant obviously the wood fibers, cellulose, and plant cells had to somehow change into animals cells. How did water gush forth from a stone?

Other questions one must ask, and many children DO indeed ask as the stories are so fantastic that they just aren't believable to someone that hasn't gained the ability to rationalize. That was my problem as a young child in sunday school. I believed the stories happened, I just wanted to know how. A prime example is Noah's Ark. I'm sure you've heard the questions before: "how did they fit all the animals onto the ark", "how did they get all of them onto the ark", "how did they keep them from killing each other", and "how did they distribute the kangaroos to Australia, the penguins to Antarctica and the alpacas to South America after landing on Mount Ararat"? These are the types of questions I asked as a kid and I KNOW I'm not the only one. Usually the type of answers I would get were "we weren't meant to know", "we will have to ask God when we get to heaven", "it's all part of his plan", "we weren't meant to understand", "we can't possibly understand God", etc. All of which were non-answers. There were a few times where I was actually scolded by a sunday school teacher and told to stop asking questions because that's what the devil wants us to do.

I've deviated from your questions a bit... I apologize. In response to your claim that if people would read the Bible, they'd all find faith in Christ. Did you know that a large percentage of people that enter seminary become atheists? That's what happens when you learn about Bible history, the obscure tales, the real nitty-gritty of it all. One thing I noticed while still a Christian, is that most Christians see religion and the Bible as a buffet; they pick the stuff the like and ignore the rest. This leads to even more contradictions. A very VERY common example is the genocide, stoning, and other immoral actions mandated in the Old Testament. People almost always say, "well when Jesus came we no longer needed the old testament. That doesn't apply anymore". Well obviously it does because the Ten Commandments are in there and I don't know any Christian that thinks we should get rid of THEM. We would also have to scrap all the prophecy that fortold of the coming of the messiah. I could give other examples, but I want to avoid being as verbose as I tend to be.

I found real joy in seeing the world as it really was. I discovered I didn't need God to explain ANYTHING and the explanations which didn't include "God" made a lot more sense than those that did. The feelings I had when I was a Christian, I feel them now as an atheist. The same feelings you get when you hear Shout to the Lord by Darlene Zschech is exactly the same feelings I get when I hear American Pie by Don McLean. With that said, I dare say that in Christianity the only reinforcement to faith is feelings. Feelings had absolutely nothing to do with me becoming atheist. I wanted to believe, I wanted to know God and his will, I prayed to him for guidance and to show me his true religion. This went on for at least a decade, probably much longer. If God wanted my trust and my devotion, why did He make it so hard to understand Him? Why did he hide? Why would he do things to confuse me and "test my faith"?

The thing I've heard from so many Christians when they ask me about my beliefs is "why would you want to believe that? I'd rather believe...". You say it's not based on feelings, but what else do Christians really have? They have hopes and desires for a better life, for cosmic justice, to see family again. These are emotional at the very core; dispair, anger, lust for revenge, lonliness, etc. Most Christians aren't even honest with themselves when it comes to what faith really is. I once heard the example, "I have faith that this chair will hold me up when I sit on it". That's equivocation; please look it up if you don't know what it means because it is important. When Christians say they have "faith" what they are really saying is the following: This story is so contradictory to what I know of the universe, it is so fantastic as to be unbelievable, but I will believe it because that is what I have to do to get into heaven. The more outrageous the story I believe, the more faith I have and I will be rewarded for it.

Do you believe in alien abductions?

If I understand right, according to the end of your post, you chose to follow Christianity because of it's perceived benefits and rewards? Don't you think God would see through that. Isn't that being a bit insincere?

To be honest, I had a career in academia for a while and I could probably count on one hand the number of people I met that believed in any god. Take the book "In Seven Days" I cannot remember the author. In this book there are many "scientists" that supposedly give evidence for God. ALL literally ALL of the evidence is junk science and I doubt so very seriously that any of the contributors are respected in their field. The funniest thing though was that most of the contributors were talking as an authority on subjects outside of their field. There was a botanist talking about geology for example. She compared deposits under bridges to stalactites in caves. "See! It doesn't take hundreds of thousands of years for stalactites to form, this bridge has them and it is only ten months old." That's not a direct quote, but a very accurate paraphrase.

No, I've never EVER met anyone that had a good reason for believing in God. Zaehet can appreciate this I'm sure, "There can't be a practical reason for believing what isn't true. [...] Either a thing is true or it isn't. If it is true you should believe it and if it isn't you shouldn't. If you can't find out whether it is true or whether it isn't you should suspend judgement. [...] It's treachery to intelluctual integrity to hold a belief because you think it's useful and not because you think it's true."

As a believer that has seen "miracles" and was pursuing a career based on my beliefs, don't you think I would have very good, logically sound reasons and have thought about it very VERY thoroughly before I throw away my faith? I spent years looking for the answers. I went to nearly every denomination that exists to talk to them hoping they could help me. Christadelphians, SDA, LDS, so on. Also I spent time with other non-traditional religions such as Eckankar, Raelians... yikes!, and the "Hare Krishnas".

Maybe that answered some of your questions. I hope you were really wanting an answer and weren't just waiting for your turn to reply to expected answers. Just one more thing that I find very interesting and important to me at least. Mother Teresa and I are a lot alike, did you know she was pretty much an atheist herself? If any of my answers didn't make sense, please let me know. I was just writing as it occured to me, so it may not always flow well.
I'm not going to write a full reply until tomorrow, but a part of me feels like it would be dishonest for me to read this and not immediately respond.
It's almost 6 a.m. here, and i have had trouble sleeping, so apologize if this is not a perfect abbreviated response.
I will continue this discussion with you tomorrow and look forward to doing so.

Study means to read and decipher as much truth and wisdom as possible from the subject matter.
To meditate upon.
Like squeezing lemon juice* from lemons.
I also wonder about the miracles,
but I also understand that miracles are miracles because they can't be explained by physical laws.
The power of God is endless and non-tangible.
The arc question is great,
I'm thinking God created animals on different continents,
Kind of like how the bible says that Adam and Eve were
the first man and woman, but then when Cain kills abel
Cain goes to other humans.
Either Adam and Eve were the first Hebrew Individuals.. Or while they were alive God was busy creating others.
It seems strange to wonder how God makes water appear from a stone or turns water into wine when He created the entire universe with just His Words.



The Holy Spirit is the proof that the promise of Christ is true..
The Holy spirit is the white light that shines out of the whites of the eyes.
Usually one eye is brighter than the other, unless you have been very diligent in your walk with God
And studying His word everyday, for a decent amount of time and being careful not to sin.
You can feel the Holy Spirit in you, I know i said not to base your faith on feelings.
But if we have to start with sensory evidence, then this is where we will start.
If you spend time reading the Holy Bible for while it will charge your spirit and you will be able to tell that inside you there is a part of your spirit that is more cold and Holy than the other spiritual matter inside your being.
It will correspond with whiteness in the eyes,
The side where the Spirit of God is the strongest will shine more brightly out of the white(s) of your eye(s).
Notice how the eye on your right, her left eye is more blue and white in the white part of her eye?
That is the Holy Ghost.
tumblr_lkoalphOoz1qbc6bw.jpg

This is a touchy subject, but i feel compelled to talk about it.
The Old Testament.
To keep God's people uncorrupted and uninfluenced over a long period of time it was necessary to purge Israel of all of the former inhabitants.
You must remember that while God is kind, He is also very severe. i.e. Hell

Romans 11:22
New Living Translation (NLT)

[SUP]22 [/SUP]Notice how God is both kind and severe. He is severe toward those who disobeyed, but kind to you if you continue to trust in his kindness. But if you stop trusting, you also will be cut off.

When it comes to morality, you must remember that we are talking about God.
Who can judge Him?
He is all knowing, therefore regardless of his actions we know they are perfect.
We are ants in His ant farm,
And i suppose if He wants to do as He pleases with us, Who are we to argue.
The LORD gives, the LORD takes away.
Also sometimes sorrow and pain is good because it leads us away from sin
2 Corinthians 7:8-10

[SUP]8 [/SUP]I am not sorry that I sent that severe letter to you, though I was sorry at first, for I know it was painful to you for a little while. [SUP]9 [/SUP]Now I am glad I sent it, not because it hurt you, but because the pain caused you to repent and change your ways. It was the kind of sorrow God wants his people to have, so you were not harmed by us in any way. [SUP]10 [/SUP]For the kind of sorrow God wants us to experience leads us away from sin and results in salvation. There’s no regret for that kind of sorrow. But worldly sorrow, which lacks repentance, results in spiritual death.


Where are you getting this data about a large percentage of people entering seminary become atheists?
I find this to be non-logical and unrealistic.

If you are getting the same feelings to american pie as you are worship music,
then when you see a Picaso does it give you the same feelings as looking at a Michelangelo painting?
I find this to be very extreme and this makes me question your ability to delineate sensory experiences.
Are you completely serious? Or are you just using an off-hand example?
Or maybe you don't think of God reverently.
Still though.. either way it still sounds off to me. With total respect.

I will answer the rest of your inquiry tomorrow.
 

Saltrock

Active Member
I have battled with with religion for a while. I have come to the conclusion I lean on the side that it's just a story or a guide line on how to live life and deal with the trials and tribulations of life. The one thing about the bible it has all these stories with people flying, miracles happening, splitting the red sea with a staff, all these amazing super human stories. Yet not one human in since those times has performed such actions, nor have we seen any evidence of gods existence. You are going to have to give me more then a beautiful flower formation or peacock feathers to convince me god exists.

God would never allow 250,000 people to die in a tsunami. What also bothers me is when someone dies and a religious person says god wanted him/her up in heaven. People say when they attended church they feel good, positive and inspired. I'll tell you one thing, people have had the same feeling walking out of a tony robbins seminar.

Personally I would love to think that our souls go up to heaven and we get to see our family and friends again. But my gut feeling tells me once we die that might be it. So if there is a chance that I am wrong and there is a heaven and do live my life as a good person pretty much in uniform with the bible , you are going to tell me god is going to send me to hell, just because I didn't except him into my heart even though I lived my life as a good human being?

Peace
Salt
 

eye exaggerate

Well-Known Member
what did Jesus cause to happen at the molecular level? In Exodus, when the staff was turned into a serpant obviously the wood fibers, cellulose, and plant cells had to somehow change into animals cells. How did water gush forth from a stone?
...hi :) Just a question for you. Are the building blocks in nature made of energy, matter, and consciousness?

...staff = spine, so far as I understand it. Turning that into a serpent is raising one's consciousness.
 

Zaehet Strife

Well-Known Member
^This is a great example of how anyone, anywhere, can twist the interpretations of the words of the bible into ANYTHING they want.

Great post btw Nietzsche... but it sucks, because i doubt the dude read past the first paragraph.
 

eye exaggerate

Well-Known Member
^This is a great example of how anyone, anywhere, can twist the interpretations of the words of the bible into ANYTHING they want.

Great post btw Nietzsche... but it sucks, because i doubt the dude read past the first paragraph.
...hi strife, this for me? Cause, those books have been around for thousands of years. No need to twist anything but a joint :clap:
 

Zaehet Strife

Well-Known Member
...
...staff = spine, so far as I understand it. Turning that into a serpent is raising one's consciousness.
Staff does not = spine, staff = staff. The staff turns into a serpent through magic, or a miracle if you please. Nowhere does it ever mention anything about the staff being a metaphor for a spine...or raising ones consciousness. That is your interpretation, your twist of the words... this is what apologetics do, they twist the words of the religious texts they read into subjective metaphors to suit their own desires.

You gave us a perfect example of this happening.
 

Heisenberg

Well-Known Member
Staff does not = spine, staff = staff. The staff turns into a serpent through magic, or a miracle if you please. Nowhere does it ever mention anything about the staff being a metaphor for a spine. That is your interpretation, your twist of the words... this is what apologetics do, they twist the words of the religious texts they read into subjective metaphors to suit their own desires.

You gave us a perfect example of this happening.
I believe eye has stated in the past something like that the inner world is subjective and therefore requires interpretation subject to the narrative of the individual, which is created by experiencing the individual. I believe eye is trying to suit his own narrative rather than suit his desire to make others believe, which is what apologetics do. Eye may twist words, apologetics twist logic.

Other than that I agree with you. I am not sure how the bible gets to be the outter world guidebook for the inner narrative.
 

Zaehet Strife

Well-Known Member
I believe eye has stated in the past something like that the inner world is subjective and therefore requires interpretation subject to the narrative of the individual, which is created by experiencing the individual. I believe eye is trying to suit his own narrative rather than suit his desire to make others believe, which is what apologetics do. Eye may twist words, apologetics twist logic.

Other than that I agree with you. I am not sure how the bible gets to be the outter world guidebook for the inner narrative.
You're right Heis, i should have used a different word than apologetic... though i can't think of the right one.

But even if he is trying to suit his own narrative, would that also not consist of him satisfying his desire to make the interperatation what he pleases?
 

Heisenberg

Well-Known Member
You're right Heis, i should have used a different word than apologetic... though i can't think of the right one.

But even if he is trying to suit his own narrative, would that also not consist of him satisfying his desire to make the interperatation what he pleases?
The term many skeptics would use is mental masturbation. It may sound like a cynical term, but it basically means exploring the creativity of your own imagination to produce a good feeling. A sophisticated and ritualistic form of fantasizing. I am not sure this is what eye is doing, but it seems to be the term you are reaching for.

This is why dualism is confusing to materialist. The inner world is facilitated by the physical world via the brain and environment, but the inner world is it's own domain, each one with the same capacity as the universe which it came from, each with a narrative shaped by experience. Just as each universe can have it's own set of fundamentals in multiverse theory, each innerverse is subject to itself, meaning materialistic rules are not as important as they are in the physical world, and sometimes get in the way.

Of course this is special pleading, but remember special pleading is not automatically invalid. It depends on the reasons given. Since there is no way to demonstrate any of this, I guess we'll never know if this special pleading is different than others.
 

eye exaggerate

Well-Known Member
Staff does not = spine, staff = staff. The staff turns into a serpent through magic, or a miracle if you please. Nowhere does it ever mention anything about the staff being a metaphor for a spine...or raising ones consciousness. That is your interpretation, your twist of the words... this is what apologetics do, they twist the words of the religious texts they read into subjective metaphors to suit their own desires.

You gave us a perfect example of this happening.
...as I was about to reply, I started to read Heis' post just below. He summed it up great.

...as to the bible / all holy books: by mistake it gets to be the outer world guide book. "To err is human", everything else out there looks like it's doing alright :razz:
 

eye exaggerate

Well-Known Member
would that also not consist of him satisfying his desire to make the interpretation what he pleases?
...how so? Genesis, by definition, is 'the beginning'. The genesis of every single person / thing alive is 'the beginning' of its existence.

...take the Hindu, or most other eastern religions. Their cultures pump out doctors and etc like mad, yet some believe an elephant, or turtle (etc), is holding up the world? K, so if I don't see one holding up their part of the world, then what? Oh, must be deeper meaning :) Dig.?
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
i've seen it suggested by scientist that before the big bang (genesis) there were many smaller failed big bangs

applying eye's logic i am now looking at my box of kleenex in a different light XD
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Well, this is such a broad subject that it might be rather difficult to give you an answer that is as thorough and coherent as I'd like; it would just take so long and I'd wind up writing a book. I have a few questions for you before I can respond though, if you don't mind.

When you say you "study the Bible everyday", can you define "study"? When I use the word study, I am meaning to think about what it is saying and leaving apologetics out of it; reading it critically not just for memorization. I asked questions when I studied, questions such as "is this moral", "how was this miracle accomplished", and so on. When I ask "how was this miracle accomplished" I'm not asking the question "how was this trick performed" as one would after observing a illusionist. I'm asking what physical laws and properties had to change in order for this to happen. For example, when Jesus turned the water to wine... what happened to the molecules in order to be transformed... what did Jesus cause to happen at the molecular level? In Exodus, when the staff was turned into a serpant obviously the wood fibers, cellulose, and plant cells had to somehow change into animals cells. How did water gush forth from a stone?

Other questions one must ask, and many children DO indeed ask as the stories are so fantastic that they just aren't believable to someone that hasn't gained the ability to rationalize. That was my problem as a young child in sunday school. I believed the stories happened, I just wanted to know how. A prime example is Noah's Ark. I'm sure you've heard the questions before: "how did they fit all the animals onto the ark", "how did they get all of them onto the ark", "how did they keep them from killing each other", and "how did they distribute the kangaroos to Australia, the penguins to Antarctica and the alpacas to South America after landing on Mount Ararat"? These are the types of questions I asked as a kid and I KNOW I'm not the only one. Usually the type of answers I would get were "we weren't meant to know", "we will have to ask God when we get to heaven", "it's all part of his plan", "we weren't meant to understand", "we can't possibly understand God", etc. All of which were non-answers. There were a few times where I was actually scolded by a sunday school teacher and told to stop asking questions because that's what the devil wants us to do.

I've deviated from your questions a bit... I apologize. In response to your claim that if people would read the Bible, they'd all find faith in Christ. Did you know that a large percentage of people that enter seminary become atheists? That's what happens when you learn about Bible history, the obscure tales, the real nitty-gritty of it all. One thing I noticed while still a Christian, is that most Christians see religion and the Bible as a buffet; they pick the stuff the like and ignore the rest. This leads to even more contradictions. A very VERY common example is the genocide, stoning, and other immoral actions mandated in the Old Testament. People almost always say, "well when Jesus came we no longer needed the old testament. That doesn't apply anymore". Well obviously it does because the Ten Commandments are in there and I don't know any Christian that thinks we should get rid of THEM. We would also have to scrap all the prophecy that fortold of the coming of the messiah. I could give other examples, but I want to avoid being as verbose as I tend to be.

I found real joy in seeing the world as it really was. I discovered I didn't need God to explain ANYTHING and the explanations which didn't include "God" made a lot more sense than those that did. The feelings I had when I was a Christian, I feel them now as an atheist. The same feelings you get when you hear Shout to the Lord by Darlene Zschech is exactly the same feelings I get when I hear American Pie by Don McLean. With that said, I dare say that in Christianity the only reinforcement to faith is feelings. Feelings had absolutely nothing to do with me becoming atheist. I wanted to believe, I wanted to know God and his will, I prayed to him for guidance and to show me his true religion. This went on for at least a decade, probably much longer. If God wanted my trust and my devotion, why did He make it so hard to understand Him? Why did he hide? Why would he do things to confuse me and "test my faith"?

The thing I've heard from so many Christians when they ask me about my beliefs is "why would you want to believe that? I'd rather believe...". You say it's not based on feelings, but what else do Christians really have? They have hopes and desires for a better life, for cosmic justice, to see family again. These are emotional at the very core; dispair, anger, lust for revenge, lonliness, etc. Most Christians aren't even honest with themselves when it comes to what faith really is. I once heard the example, "I have faith that this chair will hold me up when I sit on it". That's equivocation; please look it up if you don't know what it means because it is important. When Christians say they have "faith" what they are really saying is the following: This story is so contradictory to what I know of the universe, it is so fantastic as to be unbelievable, but I will believe it because that is what I have to do to get into heaven. The more outrageous the story I believe, the more faith I have and I will be rewarded for it.

Do you believe in alien abductions?

If I understand right, according to the end of your post, you chose to follow Christianity because of it's perceived benefits and rewards? Don't you think God would see through that. Isn't that being a bit insincere?

To be honest, I had a career in academia for a while and I could probably count on one hand the number of people I met that believed in any god. Take the book "In Seven Days" I cannot remember the author. In this book there are many "scientists" that supposedly give evidence for God. ALL literally ALL of the evidence is junk science and I doubt so very seriously that any of the contributors are respected in their field. The funniest thing though was that most of the contributors were talking as an authority on subjects outside of their field. There was a botanist talking about geology for example. She compared deposits under bridges to stalactites in caves. "See! It doesn't take hundreds of thousands of years for stalactites to form, this bridge has them and it is only ten months old." That's not a direct quote, but a very accurate paraphrase.

No, I've never EVER met anyone that had a good reason for believing in God. Zaehet can appreciate this I'm sure, "There can't be a practical reason for believing what isn't true. [...] Either a thing is true or it isn't. If it is true you should believe it and if it isn't you shouldn't. If you can't find out whether it is true or whether it isn't you should suspend judgement. [...] It's treachery to intelluctual integrity to hold a belief because you think it's useful and not because you think it's true."

As a believer that has seen "miracles" and was pursuing a career based on my beliefs, don't you think I would have very good, logically sound reasons and have thought about it very VERY thoroughly before I throw away my faith? I spent years looking for the answers. I went to nearly every denomination that exists to talk to them hoping they could help me. Christadelphians, SDA, LDS, so on. Also I spent time with other non-traditional religions such as Eckankar, Raelians... yikes!, and the "Hare Krishnas".

Maybe that answered some of your questions. I hope you were really wanting an answer and weren't just waiting for your turn to reply to expected answers. Just one more thing that I find very interesting and important to me at least. Mother Teresa and I are a lot alike, did you know she was pretty much an atheist herself? If any of my answers didn't make sense, please let me know. I was just writing as it occured to me, so it may not always flow well.
 
Top