Hours off light
- Thread starter cannabisweedPotNerd
- Start date
Cyrus420
Well-Known Member
You do realize using my grow experience as a reason to not answer any of the questions we've asked just makes you look like the cocky sob right? We've done no name calling or anything, just said that your claim of flowering after nine months of 18 hours of light can't be true. I've given you a whole list of reasons it can't and you're so focused on the fact that I'm new that you can't see how ridiculous you're acting right now. I'm pretty open actually you can check my post history I hardly go around trolling or calling names or even making claims. I ask questions and cast doubt where I think it belongs. That is how we learn, we agree, disagree, and discuss.
But we've done the agreeing and disagreeing, you're the one who doesn't want to dicuss it. You're claiming you flowered a plant on an 18/6 light schedule...fine, where's your proof beside your word? What conditions was this plant in? I want to talk about your grows and learn about this strange thing you're claiming but you don't want to discuss it at all, you just want to point at my experience and discredit me alone on that which isn't a valid debate tactic.
If I had been growing twenty years and not seen or heard of what you were talking about I still wouldn't believe you, see how my experience doesn't change that fact you're making an extraordinary claim?
You remind me of Christians who when confronted about the accuracy of the Bible and the validity of Jesus's divinity with hard facts retreat into their shell like a turtle and start arguing like they are in middle school.
Here's you:
"Oh you think I'm wrong? Well you're stupid and a doo doo head."
That is what you come across as right now and if you're really as experienced as a grower as you claim you are I'm real surprised in all your time on earth you forgot to learn how to communicate with people and not act like an ape behind the keyboard.
Your weed might be good but your attitude is shittier than mexican brick, I wouldn't want to smoke with you.
claypipe69
Well-Known Member
Yeah how does it go hes been growing for a year now so he knows everything He was born at the turn of the 90`s my guessing 99? 2000? he Bites to easy to have grown up yet,, Hydro stop tormenting the kids they cant take it >
Cyrus420
Well-Known Member
Yeah how does it go hes been growing for a year now so he knows everything He was born at the turn of the 90`s my guessing 99? 2000? he Bites to easy to have grown up yet,, Hydro stop tormenting the kids they cant take it >
You haven't even read this thread have you?
Hydro claims he flowered a plant under 18 hours of light. Not just me but several users in this thread have called bullshit on it, I spelled out how it's bullshit, asked him for proof, and he comes back at me with petty insults and doesn't even try to defend his claims with anything more than "fuck you you're wrong I'm right" attitude.
And try early nineties dude. I'm well past my teenager and young adult stage at this point. I think people like you are the ones who never grow up, thinking their age means something. You know how many stupid old people there are? When or where I was born is irrelevant to what I'm saying and you just make yourself look like an idiot by shitting on me for being admittedly young and new.
How would you like it if when you first started to grow you asked questions because someone told you something that didn't sound quite right and their retort was basically "I know better than you because I'm older."
That's what retarded people from the baby boomer and generation x times say...it's what retarded older people say. Age does not equal experience.
claypipe69
Well-Known Member
Come in spinner
CannaBruh
Well-Known Member
Not to throw fuel into the fire, but I had a "banana OG" that refused to veg for me.
It would throw massive "pre-flowers" and I'm not talking the typical calyx at each node, but stacked pre-flowers in 18-6 lighting. It might have been specific to that cultivar refusing to go back into veg from an already flowering state. It wouldn't go full on into flower, but it definitely wasn't what I'd call a vegging mom. Ditched it because I couldn't stand all those pistils in veg. Looks like a lot of folks still run that Banana OG, maybe it was just the source I got mine from was too far into flower to come back?
It would throw massive "pre-flowers" and I'm not talking the typical calyx at each node, but stacked pre-flowers in 18-6 lighting. It might have been specific to that cultivar refusing to go back into veg from an already flowering state. It wouldn't go full on into flower, but it definitely wasn't what I'd call a vegging mom. Ditched it because I couldn't stand all those pistils in veg. Looks like a lot of folks still run that Banana OG, maybe it was just the source I got mine from was too far into flower to come back?
Cyrus420
Well-Known Member
A sexually mature plant can throw pistils without flowering. I had a bag seed start showing pistils at three weeks of veg, continued to veg her for another month, no flowering, just more pistils. It means the plant is ready to flower.
Cyrus420
Well-Known Member
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Come_In_Spinner
What does this have to do with ANYTHING?
No bets have been placed, no dupes...nothing like that is happening here. You and another retard are trolling a user for being young and calling on bullshit. Keep being super mature, it just helps along my confirmation bias that most people don't deserve the brains they were born with because it's just fucking wasted.
CannaBruh
Well-Known Member
You are right, but that is not what I was describing...
What I had experienced was an interim stage between what I'd think of a typically sexually mature plant, vs something that was stuck halfway between vegging and flowering.
Cyrus420
Well-Known Member
You said you had loads of pistils, that describe a plant throwing pre flowers. Did you also get clumps of swollen calyxes? I'm not telling you that you didn't see what you saw but I still doubt a plant under 18 hours of light would do more than throw pistils. Unless buds start developing it's not flowering.
CannaBruh
Well-Known Member
It wasn't full on flowering, but it wasn't in veg.
I said it was stacking, that is not what vegging plants do ime.. this was a one-plant anomaly and not something I've seen again with exception to plants that chose to runaway into flower, which does exist in cannabis,
"I still doubt a plant under 18 hoours of light would do more than throw pistils" see ruderalis.
Cyrus420
Well-Known Member
We're talking photo period not auto flowers. I can believe that a cannabis plant can flower via mutation but I don't believe it until I see some evidence there of. That is how these things work, someone makes a claim, then that someone has to prove it. It's not up to me to find out if it's true or not, it's up to the person making the claim to provide the evidence that shows it to be true.
Skeptics can be as skeptic as they want, we're not asserting anything.
CannaBruh
Well-Known Member
Well I was talking photo periods but felt it necessary to point out that that cannabis has a very specific classification that tends to do exactly what you claimed as doubting to be possible, which is flowering under 18hrs of light.
Ever seen a male runaway to flower under veg photoperiods?
Ever seen a male runaway to flower under veg photoperiods?
Cyrus420
Well-Known Member
I haven't...and a lot of other people haven't either. I can't find anything on the internet about someone flowering under 18/6 except for personal experience from forum users. Millions of people have personal experiences with UFO's and big foot but that doesn't mean it's real.
If you can show me male or female cannabis truly flowering under an 18/6 light schedule that is a 100% photoperiod plant than I would believe.
CannaBruh
Well-Known Member
Not trying to convince you of or asking you to believe anything only sharing an outlier I had experienced with regards to plants in veg... if only ones views of what is and what isn't were centered entirely around your experiences how narrow visioned one might be...
I cannot, that particular plant was in a sort of quasi-veg/flower state" it wasn't exactly full on flowering, but in the same it was not "vegging" either, under a "vegging" photo-period.
SPLFreak808
Well-Known Member
Any less then 13 sometimes 14 hours usually triggers flowering depending on strain, ive never seen a photo indi/sat full on flower with anything over 14 hours but I've seen outdoor indicas that wont flower untill 11.5 and under.