I just got here. My methods run contrary to what the majority of growers believe.
No every site your images can be found are you copying and pasting the same image with the same message pushing your book.
Indeed, that does.
That may be the truth.He is not a fraud, I have met and smoked with Douglas and ya remember that Pink Kush I grew? It was him that gifted it to me. You may not agree with his presentation but he knows his stuff. He has an edge over most growers because he is hyper sensitive to things, give him a bud with pesticides or crap and he'll know right away and it is what he has had to learn about growing because of this that he is tryin to share.
I was tryin to stay outta it but couldn't any longer
Look at the dates on the other sites. I'm following about 6 threads across 3 sites right now. All in the last what, 2 weeks?
He says he wants to dispell information by substituting his own personal information. There is nothing wrong with that but when he claims it's the best way, the cleanest way, that his is better blah blah blah without actually going into any real specific details about his grow, nor has he posted any actual pictures of his grows, then how is he currently any different than the other uncited resources he wants to dispell? Until he can prove his results I'm in doubt and it bothers me that he is so dismissive without providing actual proof. We're not attacking him just calling bullshit and we want OP to actual put up the game he is talking himself up to be.
I understand, I'm coming from the point of extreme quality and extreme sensitivity.Indeed, that does.
Because it explains your point of departure and assumptions.
You're a control freak - and I'm an emulator, we have fundamentally different approaches
As you can imagine, there's very little. I remember the cadmiumI'd like to read up on the accumulator thing though, can you link me something?
thanks
I want to know how you got eight years of solid research behind you but yet you haven't taken pictures of your grows. It's not like digital cameras didn't exist then.
I don't work in photos?
Much appreciated. Be sure to post the results.
Yeah it seems most of the texts focus on studies that have been done for viability of cannabis as a soil sanitizer for nickel, lead and cadmium, and that they found the plant does grow under such conditions / have a readiness to take these up. Not relevant when growing in living soil with good base material, which won't have elevated levels of any of these
They may contain elevated levels (for cannabis anyway) of other elements. This pattern of behavior points to the plant being capable of doing the same with other elements, not just heavy metals. "Outside the ionic uptake"Yeah it seems most of the texts focus on studies that have been done for viability of cannabis as a soil sanitizer for nickel, lead and cadmium, and that they found the plant does grow under such conditions / have a readiness to take these up. Not relevant when growing in living soil with good base material, which won't have elevated levels of any of these
What happens when you amend the soil with too much silica? You have to use a grinder and the end smoke is hotter. In an organic environment, cannabis will happily absorb more silica than humans prefer for smoking.
Removing leaves would further reduce the need for nutrients and slow transpiration. Not really something I'd recommend, probably have poor results. I really have no experience with it though.
He doesn't have to prove shit to anyone, especially not you. You swear like your opinion or validation have any weight around here. All OP was doing was sharing some info take it or leave it.