drlearysbud
Well-Known Member
If THC percentage is that important just stick with making hash....although high THC rates are nice the plants more of a elegant wine....where as hash is some Johnny Walker.....lol
If THC percentage is that important just stick with making hash....although high THC rates are nice the plants more of a elegant wine....where as hash is some Johnny Walker.....lol
Actually 12% is the potency a first time grower who at least pays attention to ph, nutrient strength ,and adheres to a strict lighting schedule can expect to from white widow seeds from GHS as it is a moderate difficulty plant to grow but ever single time I have picked up white widow from a grower of expert or better skills its more in the 15-18% range. I have noticed that ghs lists there potency's based on what the lowest potency plant will produce in any successful grow because I have seen people pick up Great white shark which is supposed to be around 14% thc and grow it into bud that is well over 20% total 1 toke dope, its possible they may have just gotten a seed which provided a plant of exceptional genetics but I see it happen way to often, Another example is in my current grow I have a clone of hollands hope wich is supposed to be only a 12%thc strain and the test bud I took which was about 3 weeks early is already well over 12%. So thc listings are bunk they are only a rough estimate of what the plant will produce in the average home growers setup the better your grow enviroment ,nute quality and overall skills at reading exactly what the plant needs and the higher your potency getsFrom what I have read greenhouse is the original breeders of white widow I'm pretty sure...so the 12% mark would be right. If that is the case the rest are just name stealing.
Good luck finding something that potent. If you do, please tell us. The best stuff never leaves the circles, worldwide truth. I personally find the Cannabinoid profile, or sum of all Cannabinoids, to be of more importance than just the THC percent. The other Cannabinoids work synergistically with THC to alter and increase it's affect, and some Cannabinoids have affects that are very different, compared to THC. Cannabinoid profile is determined by a combination on genetics and environment. I need a some CBD with that THC.
Actually 12% is the potency a first time grower who at least pays attention to ph, nutrient strength ,and adheres to a strict lighting schedule can expect to from white widow seeds from GHS as it is a moderate difficulty plant to grow but ever single time I have picked up white widow from a grower of expert or better skills its more in the 15-18% range. I have noticed that ghs lists there potency's based on what the lowest potency plant will produce in any successful grow because I have seen people pick up Great white shark which is supposed to be around 14% thc and grow it into bud that is well over 20% total 1 toke dope, its possible they may have just gotten a seed which provided a plant of exceptional genetics but I see it happen way to often, Another example is in my current grow I have a clone of hollands hope wich is supposed to be only a 12%thc strain and the test bud I took which was about 3 weeks early is already well over 12%. So thc listings are bunk they are only a rough estimate of what the plant will produce in the average home growers setup the better your grow enviroment ,nute quality and overall skills at reading exactly what the plant needs and the higher your potency gets
The strongest pot I've seen around here is a strain called Chemo. Don't know who has seeds.
i think thc content is a total scam. they never show you the numbers and data from the gas spectrometer that they allegedly use for the calculations of thc percentages
got some sour tsunami seeds with 9% thc but a staggering 9% cbd as well
whoa defensive are we? oh yea forgot that you work there and are defending your business...personally i dont care who you are.
i never said science wasnt real. but spitting out numbers without telling us your measurents is pretty flawed im not going to lie. its not like the scientists that invented pcr reactions kept the technique all to themselves. they were more than thrilled to present their findings to the scientific community for review and evaluation. imo what you guys are doing is not science.