Hey Liberals? Guns work!!

bravedave

Well-Known Member
Actually my name is Clarence, and my parents came from a real good marriage. And I went to private school. You haven't walked 8 miles in my shoes, son. Ya heard!
Well at least the name, sounds about right. The rest only attests to your imagination.
Shoes?
Nor you mine,Clarisse.
 
Last edited:

see4

Well-Known Member
Well at least the name, sounds about right. The rest only attests to your imagination.
Shoes?
Nor you mine,Charisse.
Clearly you haven't seen the movie 8 Mile. It's ok, you are a redneck, it was a stretch to think you have.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Everybody has the right to defend themselves. Nobody has the right to start shit.

For those who advocate getting rid of guns...will you use guns to enforce your gun confiscation edict?
 

Moldy

Well-Known Member
Re the "goofy prof", my apology, I made the assumption you were a supporter based on this comment: "As a gun control type liberal..." My bad, sorry if I offended you.

My point, the president does have the ability to re-direct his AG to reschedule. So far the magic man has refused, who knows, maybe just before he leaves.

Obviously a two year old doesn't have enough experience at life to use a gun. Does a 10 year old under adult supervision, there are some that do. This is a parenting issue.

Not sure what you mean by documentation, but there is a fair amount of paper work that has to be filled out at the time of a gun purchase.

Re training: there isn't all that much to it, charge the gun, point and activate. You do have to know what end the projectile exits. But there isn't much more than that. A wise person would know their liabilities/limitations and act accordingly. If you're implying that there's a lot of stupid people on this planet, you'd be correct. But you aren't going to fix stupid in a class. There's certainly nothing preventing a person from seeking out training on their own. And yes, like everything else in life, you get out of it what you put in. Practice is a good thing.

Btw, Obama's comments have the gun market burning like hot cakes ... again. If you don't have a gun I would suggest that you research one and make a purchase, if nothing else you would have the experience as a reference.
Since it's a federal crime to have weed and a firearm I couldn't comment, I plead the 5th. But if I did have a gun it would be a bad motherfucker.
 

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
While clearly you have given much deep and insightful consideration to this matter it seems that you are overly optimistic. If it took heavily armed and highly trained police 350 rounds to kill them, how many armed citizens within 4 minutes of the scene would it take to do the job?
Well, they were not out in the open. They were in a vehicle.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
While clearly you have given much deep and insightful consideration to this matter it seems that you are overly optimistic. If it took heavily armed and highly trained police 350 rounds to kill them, how many armed citizens within 4 minutes of the scene would it take to do the job?
It took 2 rounds to kill the terrorists. The other 348 was just making sure :P
 

bravedave

Well-Known Member
You mean removing a non viable foetus?

Fucking moron.

If there were no abortions you'd be crying even moar about welfare that you already do.
Restricting abortions to the non-viable would be a good first step.

But as you hear on the radio...a baby is a baby, is a baby, baby.
 
Last edited:

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Restricting abortions to the non-viable would be a good first step.

But as you hear on the radio...a baby is a baby, is a baby, baby.
No...No they're not.

A baby is a seperate entity to their mother capable of physical survival on their own.

A 10 week old fetus has none of the specialisation required to be an independently functioning living organism.

I will agree that it needs to have a time restriction on it, but by your logic noone should ever have a tumour removed either...

It contains all the genetic material required to produce a human being afterall.
 

bravedave

Well-Known Member
No...No they're not.

A baby is a seperate entity to their mother capable of physical survival on their own.

A 10 week old fetus has none of the specialisation required to be an independently functioning living organism.

I will agree that it needs to have a time restriction on it, but by your logic noone should ever have a tumour removed either...

It contains all the genetic material required to produce a human being afterall.
Let's not hijack. 100s of viable fetuses are aborted daily. Like Cowboy Sam says, those who do so. have expended all their moral authority.<--period
 

pnwmystery

Well-Known Member
Hang on a second, define the word viable in your own words.
He can't, really. He's too wrapped up in the Chrisitan-right-GOP fantasy that if a 1 week old fetus were to pop out of the womb it would be singing praises to Jesus and Ronnie Reagan. He probably agrees with the guy who shot up PP.
 
Top