Heart Stopping Headline: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is...

zeddd

Well-Known Member
Ya know James the chain around a black man's neck was never as heavy, as the chain made of hate and fear that the Trumpers wear around their's. A black man never abased himself to a master, like these morons do with Trump, only their body's were owned, not their minds and souls. No Black people to the best of my knowledge committed suicide at their master's whim, but many died fighting for their freedom. Who is the bigger slave James, the black man in the antebellum south, or the modern Trumper, who is a fool, a traitor and Hell bent on personal and national suicide? MAGA means moron and anybody who wears the hat is one. Or carries Trump's water here!
Top tip white man, stop talking about what slaves didn’t suffer. Fucking disgrace you are sometimes
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
i'm going to say back in the day when they used to make people get blood tests? they did that here in the states.
White men were very worried about black guys marrying 'their' women. Lots of crazy shit has happened. But trying to pretend that Ginsberg was trying to force non-heterosexual marriages into some sort of position to be 'forced' to obtain a marrage license is just as asinine as may of bigfoots other conspiracies.

Can't they just review all those NSA records and figure that shit out for themselves?

And yes, a license is "asking for permission" to do x .
People can get married anytime, if they want to get all those government protections they need to register it.
 

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
Betcha an ounce you're wrong.
He will win because the left choose a terrible candidate once again.
Bet you a quarter pound you only watch Fox.

Do they cover the double digit leads Biden has which are outside the margin of error?

And anybody they pick is terrible to you anyway, you support rich white people.

And you still didn't answer the question why the economy is always in shambles and the debt is higher everytime a republican leaves office since the 1990s? Just the facts, ma'am. Thanks.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
White men were very worried about black guys marrying 'their' women. Lots of crazy shit has happened. But trying to pretend that Ginsberg was trying to force non-heterosexual marriages into some sort of position to be 'forced' to obtain a marrage license is just as asinine as may of bigfoots other conspiracies.


People can get married anytime, if they want to get all those government protections they need to register it.
i was under the impression it had to do with brother/sister marriages..but they didn't have dna then.
 
Last edited:

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Top tip white man, stop talking about what slaves didn’t suffer. Fucking disgrace you are sometimes
The truth is never out of bounds and the last time I checked black people were part of the human race too, there is only one by they way, the human one. You are from the UK and your ancestors were probably, never slaves.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
The truth is never out of bounds and the last time I checked black people were part of the human race too, there is only one by they way, the human one. You are from the UK and your ancestors were probably, never slaves.
not in the american sense but the UK monarchy could be some very fvcked up rulers and they might as well have been slaves.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Top tip white man, stop talking about what slaves didn’t suffer. Fucking disgrace you are sometimes
BTW The point was about white racist abasing themselves for Trump and hate. This applies to all racists, even black ones, though they have just cause.
I use this to troll racist and I might as well troll you with it too.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
all those government protections
Except in reality, it is impossible for an entity which is funded and founded in coercion, to also be the entity which will protect people from coercion.

The best it could possibly do is offer this, "We might take your money with or without your consent and maybe, just maybe we'll make sure nobody else does that. "

Supreme Court justices purpose is often to find "new" ways to interpret the constitution to reduce liberty and expand their own power. Some day, maybe with or without your consent I will tell that story. Not today though. :)
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Except in reality, it is impossible for an entity which is funded and founded in coercion, to also be the entity which will protect people from coercion.

The best it could possibly do is offer this, "We might take your money with or without your consent and maybe, just maybe we'll make sure nobody else does that. "

Supreme Court justices purpose is often to find "new" ways to interpret the constitution to reduce liberty and expand their own power. Some day, maybe with or without your consent I will tell that story. Not today though. :)
please tag me when you tell the story; i've been waiting.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Right up to the nineteenth century there was such a thing as indentured servitude, it applied to white people, and then brown people, before it was abolished. It essentially enslaved you for many years, in exchange for passage to the new world for instance, many of the white overseers of black slaves on the sugar islands were more or less slaves themselves! Gradually it became a way for slaves to gain freedom by purchasing it, until slavery was abolished in the British empire in the 1820s and the Royal Navy started intercepting outlaw slave ships to America.

There are better ways to exploit people than slavery though...
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Never, ever fucking happen now with less than 4 months until the election.
McConnell fucked with Obama for over a year on his selection for the Supreme Court, so now it's payback time.
She could die tomorrow, God forbid, but Trump is finished fucking with America, his nominees for court positions are over.
Nope.
 

bundee1

Well-Known Member
It says I consistently defend consent as being an important ingredient to human interactions.

It says that many people do not, preferring instead to emotionally present contradictory arguments within seconds of each other and to genuflect on the altar of illogic by violating consent when it gives them the things they want.

In other words, I'm still winning.
Yeah I'm sure the girls see it that way too.
 
Top