Government claims it owns children, threatens 2nd mom with jail

Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Olive Drab Green said:
I say we, to mean our country. The experiments were intended to watch the progression of syphilis and the eventual death of the subject, who were blatantly lied to. If you don’t see a difference between a crime against humanity and a medical innoculation, I dunno what to tell you.
Click to expand...
So the crime was the experiments in Tuskegee were done without the human guinea pigs consent and that's what makes it wrong ?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Olive Drab Green said:
I say we, to mean our country. The experiments were intended to watch the progression of syphilis and the eventual death of the subject, who were blatantly lied to. If you don’t see a difference between a crime against humanity and a medical innoculation, I dunno what to tell you.
Click to expand...


So, you'd be okay with forced sterilization of lesser human ?
 
Jimdamick

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
Singlemalt said:
Yep. However, there should also be a means of holding national leaders responsible for wars of profit and adventure, then they pay the price
Click to expand...
Name one, that has been held responsible?
Like Nixon? (Vietnam)
Like Bush? (Iraq)
Like Reagan? (Grenada/Lebanon)
They were never held accountable for the American soldiers they sacrificed for their egos.
All they get is warships and airports named after them.
 
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
So, you'd be okay with forced sterilization of lesser human ?
Click to expand...
No, because there is no “lesser human” and no one has the right to remove part of your anatomy. I’m in favor of elected sterilization for pedophiles, but never forced. Again, no comparison. Innoculations improve your immune system, they don’t forcibly remove a part of you.
 
Singlemalt

Singlemalt

Well-Known Member
Jimdamick said:
Name one, that has been held responsible?
Like Nixon? (Vietnam)
Like Bush? (Iraq)
Like Reagan? (Grenada/Lebanon)
They were never held accountable for the American soldiers they sacrificed for their egos.
All they get is warships and airports named after them.
Click to expand...
All three, and JFK /Johnson(Vietnam)

Note I said should be held responsible; that is one of many problems in our society
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Olive Drab Green said:
No, because there is no “lesser human” and no one has the right to remove part of your anatomy. I’m in favor of elected sterilization for pedophiles, but never forced. Again, no comparison. Innoculations improve your immune system, they don’t forcibly remove a part of you.
Click to expand...

Why don't people have a right to remove parts of your anatomy? is it because you think people should have control over their own bodies or because you hate cannibals ?
 
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Why don't people have a right to remove parts of your anatomy? is it because you think people should have control over their own bodies or because you hate cannibals ?
Click to expand...
Because removing a part of your body is invasive, destructive, and it’s removing a piece of you. No one has the right to take away your ability to procreate without your consent, that’s huge. Innoculations aren’t removing a piece of you, they are meant to improve already existing pieces of you. They’re also no where near as invasive or destructive.

Innoculations are a way to maintaining proper health and hygiene. They aren’t removing what makes you you.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Singlemalt said:
All three, and JFK /Johnson(Vietnam)

Note I said should be held responsible; that is one of many problems in our society
Click to expand...
Conflicts / death on a war sized scale become increasingly more likely when power is centralized in a government. If it could be proven less government meant less harm / less war would you consider that as an alternative ?
 
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Conflicts / death on a war sized scale become increasingly more likely when power is centralized in a government. If it could be proven less government meant less harm / less war would you consider that as an alternative ?
Click to expand...
Oh, I totally believe in limited government. This isn’t about the government, it’s more about the will of society/the People. No one wants their kid to die of a preventable disease.
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Olive Drab Green said:
No, because there is no “lesser human” and no one has the right to remove part of your anatomy. I’m in favor of elected sterilization for pedophiles, but never forced. Again, no comparison. Innoculations improve your immune system, they don’t forcibly remove a part of you.
Click to expand...
I believe the proposed "treatment" for paedophilia is "chemical castration".

Sterilization would just mean they couldn't impregnate their victims (if they're even old enough for that), castration would almost entirely cut off the supply of testosterone and reduce sexual impulses to a huge degree and have the bonus effects of sterilization too.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Olive Drab Green said:
Because removing a part of your body is invasive, destructive, and it’s removing a piece of you. No one has the right to take away your ability to procreate without your consent, that’s huge. Innoculations aren’t removing a piece of you, they are meant to improve already existing pieces of you. They’re also no where near as invasive or destructive.
Click to expand...
Maybe they aren't invasive to YOU. Should other people get to decide what is and isn't invasive regarding their own bodies ?

Would you advocate dismissing a persons religious rights and forcibly giving them a vaccine ?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Olive Drab Green said:
Oh, I totally believe in limited government. This isn’t about the government, it’s more about the will of society/the People. No one wants their kid to die of a preventable disease.
Click to expand...
So the will of the individual over what goes into their body (or their kids) is secondary to the will of a bunch of strangers ?
 
Singlemalt

Singlemalt

Well-Known Member
Yes. I also think political offices should be filled in a system like jury duty, selected candidates selected (voir dire) and then would be vetted. You serve one term; permanent infrastructure(non-elected) would be replaced every 6-8 yrs. No one builds a power base, no one gets wealthy and no one can subvert the system
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Singlemalt said:
Yes. I also think political offices should be filled in a system like jury duty, selected candidates selected (voir dire) and then would be vetted. You serve one term; permanent infrastructure(non-elected) would be replaced every 6-8 yrs. No one builds a power base, no one gets wealthy and no one can subvert the system
Click to expand...
Well you did warn me you have some pretty draconian ideas.
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
So the will of the individual over what goes into their body (or their kids) is secondary to the will of a bunch of strangers ?
Click to expand...
Anti-vaxxers are a direct threat to other people and are directly and demonstrably responsible for the reemergence of previously almost extinct diseases like TB and measles.

I think my right (more accurately immunodeficient people's right) not to be exposed to disease carriers (directly threatened) takes precedence over some retard's anti-science "feels".

For the same logical reason you cant drive drunk or carry a weapon when you're in the bar drinking.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top