Timmahh..this debate started because you said these laws MUST call for dismissal. Again, you are the one changing your wording, while calling me the one who doesn't understand. This debate started because I was correct in my interpertation of the 08 MMM Act, and your desire for me to be wrong. Which ofcourse I have not been. Hurts I know bob, but yet again, I let you prove yourself wrong, and you did a splendid job of it...
You finally came around to understanding the relevance of the term "reasonable". Yes, the 1/10 of 1 percent of patients needing Simpson oil, will get benefit from that term. 99.9% of patients will not. As I have stated time and time again bob, reasonable will very by every case... and if their is a question of that trier of FACT, it is for a JURY To decide, not a Judge. That is what I have said, the MSC upheld, and you still ignore.
Go section 8 because you are over on a section 4 limitation or "locked and secure", and almost every patient will fail in the defense.
Section 8 is a Safety Net. it catches the possible quirks in the system and allows them to present proper evidence and removes the costly Trials in Court of Law, when there is really no need for it. So if your a Registered Pt, and you can not use a sec 4, you still have the oppertunity to use 8, providing you still qualify under the 3 needs, and havnt violated any of 7. and under a sec 8, that is what you need to prove to have case dismissed.
Our law gave us more plants per person than most other States. I think its workable... and Happy to see it. People using all their plants for common reasons, pain of the normal variety being the big one, will simply lose under the definition of "reasonable" amount. A judge or jury, isn't gonna buy that you need the full amount of plant material you are allowed to treat minor pain issues. Won't happen.
Reasonable Amount is a Trier of FACT and NOT for a Judge to decide, the MSC stated Triers of Facts, are ONLY for a Jury to decide on.
Yes, the simpson oil patient is an exception..but they are few in number compared to the majority of med patients. You know as well as I do, that the majority of card holders have recommendations based on less than compelling medical records. Lets not be so short sigted bob. THEY ALL Have a Drs recommendation, and are On the Registry. END OF STORY. That sir, IS THE LAW as We the People Enacted it. See you Love to state 1/2 and partial truths facts to support your ill gotten thoughts. just like Bill Schuette and the Prosecution Crew does.
Again we are looking for the same things. The difference is that I side with a cautious approach, and you have an entitled approach.
Be honest, you side with caution as you say, because your terrified your government will screw you every chance it gets. And your right It will. But I on the other hand Stand up for My Rights, and am a Law abiding Citizen, and Follow the Law. I am also not trusting of my government, but unlike you, I wont hide with my tail between my legs, hoping and praying I am the one they show mercy on. lol
Oh I also stand up for Your rights, so you dont have to be such a skerdycat about it bob.
I just don't want the guys with cards for "pain from hangnail" med reasons, thinking these rulings protect them more than they do.
Who give 3 fucks what you want of others. That is not your RIGHT to judge them. fact Is we all have to be smart enough to know the law, and what is expected of us. Just because you choose to allow your government to tell you want it wants you to hear, and you then gobble it up with delight, does not mean that is how anyone else must exist. Sorry, you ll never sell anyone that boatload of manure unless they are as much of a sheeple as you appear to be.
It will still go down that, once arrested, most people are fuc@@d. There will be fewer arrests, as the SC sent a clear message to leave people in compliance alone, but if they do find cause for arrest..your probably gonna lose on the "reasonable" interpretation.
