Global Warming Update

dukeofbaja

dukeofbaja

New Member
fdd2blk "i did a site wide search for "fdd2blk" and "cockhead". this thread is the only result that came up."

My apologies, I was wrong. It was jeff f who made that comment after quoting you. But since you agree with him, of course there was no need to remark about it, that is reserved for those you disagree with.
 
I

Illegal Smile

Guest
Leave it to this bunch of crackpots to try to tax the weather.
 
P

PadawanBater

Guest
I think the saddest part about it is half these guys don't know the difference between "weather" and "climate"...
 
Woodstock.Hippie

Woodstock.Hippie

New Member
"Disenfranchised and you don't even know IT"

[youtube]5gK2EEwzjPQ[/youtube][youtube]6O9cYTZXekA[/youtube][youtube]MFZo5PqvEak[/youtube]

Have no doubt, you will have time to grab your ZEEP

What Does The World Look Like Through Your Lens?

cause

Reality Is Just A Perception.

[youtube]LACyLTsH4ac[/youtube]

:hump:
:peace:
 
P

PadawanBater

Guest
Illegal Smile said:
Maybe that's why they say the climate is changing when it's just the weather.
Click to expand...
The climate is changing, according to 89% of published scientists, 32 international science academies, and the vast majority of climatologists and meteorologists worldwide. I don't see how you can still argue with that.

If it changes too much very bad things happen. Things I don't think you guys have actually really given it's worth in time thinking about. It would be the largest natural disaster in human history, kill millions of people, and cause devastation and damage in the trillions. It would take place over a very long amount of time, decades probably, but it would all be the result of the increasing global temperature.

This issue is primarily a scientific one. Politics should not come into play at all when analyzing scientific data.

Don't most of you guys propose competition anyway? Why such an issue with green competitors in the energy field? Shouldn't we let the markets decide? Why does the gov. come in and restrict or buy out and suspend technologies that could put every single existing oil corporation out of business? Is the entire thing simply because you've been led to believe they're trying to tax the amount of emissions you're emitting? Explain to me how it works, how much are you being taxed as a result of this "global warming/climate change" worldwide conspiracy? What comes out of your paycheck?

Are you saying the science isn't valid? There's no such thing as "the greenhouse effect"? C02 emissions and increased amounts of Carbon in the atmosphere is good for the planet? Do you know what gases mainly make up the atmosphere of Venus? Or are some of you going to say it's because of it's close proximity to the Sun? Well, Mercury, the closest planet has a surface temperature of 420C, Venus stands twice the distance and has a surface temperature of 460C.

So someone please start explaining things..
 
I

Illegal Smile

Guest
PadawanBater said:
The climate is changing, according to 89% of published scientists, 32 international science academies, and the vast majority of climatologists and meteorologists worldwide. I don't see how you can still argue with that.

If it changes too much very bad things happen. Things I don't think you guys have actually really given it's worth in time thinking about. It would be the largest natural disaster in human history, kill millions of people, and cause devastation and damage in the trillions. It would take place over a very long amount of time, decades probably, but it would all be the result of the increasing global temperature.

This issue is primarily a scientific one. Politics should not come into play at all when analyzing scientific data.

Don't most of you guys propose competition anyway? Why such an issue with green competitors in the energy field? Shouldn't we let the markets decide? Why does the gov. come in and restrict or buy out and suspend technologies that could put every single existing oil corporation out of business? Is the entire thing simply because you've been led to believe they're trying to tax the amount of emissions you're emitting? Explain to me how it works, how much are you being taxed as a result of this "global warming/climate change" worldwide conspiracy? What comes out of your paycheck?

Are you saying the science isn't valid? There's no such thing as "the greenhouse effect"? C02 emissions and increased amounts of Carbon in the atmosphere is good for the planet? Do you know what gases mainly make up the atmosphere of Venus? Or are some of you going to say it's because of it's close proximity to the Sun? Well, Mercury, the closest planet has a surface temperature of 420C, Venus stands twice the distance and has a surface temperature of 460C.

So someone please start explaining things..
Click to expand...
But this is a politics board. We are discussing the political implications of things right? We're not here to analyze data. I'm not spending time or energy discussing whether man made global warming exists. I'm facinated by how it is playing out politically though.
 
Big P

Big P

Well-Known Member
lol tax the air, leave it to a liberal

i break laws that are unjust like cannabis laws

people will fight any bogus taxes anyway they can, trust






 
P

PadawanBater

Guest
Illegal Smile said:
But this is a politics board. We are discussing the political implications of things right? We're not here to analyze data. I'm not spending time or energy discussing whether man made global warming exists. I'm facinated by how it is playing out politically though.
Click to expand...
Dude, like I said, politics have no role in analyzing the data. This is a scientific issue. If you looked at ONLY the science, and NONE of the politics, you would have no other option than to conclude that this is a very serious problem.

The politics are irrelevant.
 
dukeofbaja

dukeofbaja

New Member
Funny how they tried to debate the science, in a political thread, until they realized it was a losing battle. Then they pointed out its a politcal thread, get out of here with your science and facts.
 
jeff f

jeff f

New Member
dukeofbaja said:
Funny how they tried to debate the science, in a political thread, until they realized it was a losing battle. Then they pointed out its a politcal thread, get out of here with your science and facts.
Click to expand...
when you say "they" who do you mean?

your science is flawed so the only thing to really discuss is the politics.

remember, we are out to "get" the oil companies. thats what the whole thing is about. weather/climate changes. always has, always will. aint shit you can do about it and you cant cause it to change either way. fact of life, get over it.
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
Global warming advocates now have us SURROUNDED!!! :lol:

If it gets hotter ... it's because of global warming.

If it gets colder ... it's because of global warming.

Sounds scientific right?

Only politics can occupy every position with a straight face. :wink:
 
P

PadawanBater

Guest
Yet none of you addressed what I posted...

Someone gonna take a stab at it?
 
CrackerJax

CrackerJax

New Member
Again, no one is denying that the climate changes. The difficulties lie in assuming that man is either dictating or can correct that change.

There is very little evidence that man has had any appreciable impact on long term weather. So far, most of the data used in global warming models have either been debunked, lost (amazing lie), or discredited to the point of either revision or retraction.

ONLY the politics is still keeping it alive.

This has been a huge black eye for science.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top