Budley Doright
Well-Known Member
Ummm ya ok lol. I know what makes the news but not a follower of the sordid tales of debauchery and exclusion.that would be him. you should know all monarchy dirt; you're still part of the commonwealth.
Ummm ya ok lol. I know what makes the news but not a follower of the sordid tales of debauchery and exclusion.that would be him. you should know all monarchy dirt; you're still part of the commonwealth.
well friend that did make news. ughhhhh so grosss i will never be able to un-hear it..did you hear the file?Ummm ya ok lol. I know what makes the news but not a follower of the sordid tales of debauchery and exclusion.
Fuck all dirty parasites, get a job. These people are thieves. If she sold just 2 of the stolen diamonds, one from India at 105 carats the other from Africa at 530 carats she could end child hunger in this worldWhen the Queen dies it would be awesome if Charles donated everything away turned all palaces into museum for the people. go live in a real house.
although it was said to be Charles who was the one concerned about Harry's kids skin color.
what happened to Diana was a travesty.
i'm glad Harry broke free; who wants Prince Pedos role?
The Armenian genocideDo you have specific, current instances of this culling?
i totally agree and in this day and age you would think they would do just what you posted. Blood Diamonds well read yanks will never forget.Fuck all dirty parasites, get a job. These people are thieves. If she sold just 2 of the stolen diamonds, one from India at 105 carats the other from Africa at 530 carats she could end child hunger in this world
Over a century ago, not current.The Armenian genocide
More recent. Not actual killing but still despicable.Over a century ago, not current.
I guess my headscratcher was the use of the word culling, which has a meaning beyond population control. There is a directed breeding element. To be a cull, you have to be chosen for having or lacking a specified quality. So simple genocide does not qualify.
So where on the planet is a minority population being bred for traits and not just persecuted?
Huh? I would assume ridding the populace of an unwanted color/race/religion would also be a cull. Just as wildlife is culled to eliminate some of the population. I think this is a splitting of hairs thing .Over a century ago, not current.
I guess my headscratcher was the use of the word culling, which has a meaning beyond population control. There is a directed breeding element. To be a cull, you have to be chosen for having or lacking a specified quality. So simple genocide does not qualify.
So where on the planet is a minority population being bred for traits and not just persecuted?
A cull is discriminate. You’re eradicating or stabilizing specific namable traits. Genocide is indiscriminate within the targeted population.Huh? I would assume ridding the populace of an unwanted color/race/religion would also be a cull. Just as wildlife is culled to eliminate some of the population. I think this is a splitting of hairs thing .
So Israel ?A cull is discriminate. You’re eradicating or stabilizing specific namable traits. Genocide is indiscriminate within the targeted population.
They had their own trouble with a hard-right maniac. I’m hoping things are getting better there.So Israel ?
MyanmarOver a century ago, not current.
I guess my headscratcher was the use of the word culling, which has a meaning beyond population control. There is a directed breeding element. To be a cull, you have to be chosen for having or lacking a specified quality. So simple genocide does not qualify.
So where on the planet is a minority population being bred for traits and not just persecuted?
Rohingya? Killing, not culling. Some may call it splitting hairs, and I think that is not only wrong, but I feel it carries a social pressure/shaming component.Myanmar
I would cull genociders.Rohingya? Killing, not culling. Some may call it splitting hairs, and I think that is not only wrong, but I feel it carries a social pressure/shaming component.
So far all I have learned is that cull was used incorrectly the first time, implying more than was actually being said. I doubt there have been any human culls since slavery was largely abandoned.
Me, I’d exterminate them.I would cull genociders.
I think that’s what fogdog meant and why I liked his post.But cull? I’m not trying to shape their population. I’m trying to root it out entire.
I prefer cull the herdMe, I’d exterminate them.
While I am dead (!) set against a judicial death penalty, genociders and warlords have abandoned the social contract and are eligible for immediate unbeing under wartime rules.
But cull? I’m not trying to shape their population. I’m trying to root it out entire.
Would that not be culling humanity?Me, I’d exterminate them.
While I am dead (!) set against a judicial death penalty, genociders and warlords have abandoned the social contract and are eligible for immediate unbeing under wartime rules.
But cull? I’m not trying to shape their population. I’m trying to root it out entire.
I hold onto the idea that culling is directed.Would that not be culling humanity?
You need helpMe, I’d exterminate them.
While I am dead (!) set against a judicial death penalty, genociders and warlords have abandoned the social contract and are eligible for immediate unbeing under wartime rules.
But cull? I’m not trying to shape their population. I’m trying to root it out entire.