psyte
Active Member
I have a question about genotype vs phenotype and this seemed like the best place to post it.
It seems to me like a lot of growers use the word "phenotype" incorrectly when describing the differences between two plants grown from seeds of the same strain. From my admittedly very limited understanding of basic genetics... aren't phenotypes the results of the same genotype expressing itself differently in different environments? In other words, when someone is growing multiple seeds of the same strain under the exact same conditions and they say they have different phenotypes, how could that be correct? The environmental factors would be the same so how would that cause the expression of two different phenotypes? Wouldn't that be an expression of slightly different genotypes?
If you had a plant with high phenotype plasticity, you could conceivably grow a clone of it in a very different environment and have a very different looking plant, but that's the only case where it seems it would be appropriate to call it a different phenotype.
I'm just curious if I'm missing something here or if we're using the word phenotype incorrectly.
It seems to me like a lot of growers use the word "phenotype" incorrectly when describing the differences between two plants grown from seeds of the same strain. From my admittedly very limited understanding of basic genetics... aren't phenotypes the results of the same genotype expressing itself differently in different environments? In other words, when someone is growing multiple seeds of the same strain under the exact same conditions and they say they have different phenotypes, how could that be correct? The environmental factors would be the same so how would that cause the expression of two different phenotypes? Wouldn't that be an expression of slightly different genotypes?
If you had a plant with high phenotype plasticity, you could conceivably grow a clone of it in a very different environment and have a very different looking plant, but that's the only case where it seems it would be appropriate to call it a different phenotype.
I'm just curious if I'm missing something here or if we're using the word phenotype incorrectly.