Dr. Who
Well-Known Member
There are things to be taken from that study. However, the plants in the study were feed increased amounts of N through out the grow. This points to the fact that overfeed plants do not produce well, quality wise or yield for that matter (for our purpose). So much for the "hard push" and yellow out of highly increased P&K too!No doubt we need more tests. We have been severely limited in that ability due to legal issues. We are approaching a new time in learning.
Growing formulations of nutrients are made to include a reduction of N in bloom. Unfortunately, the majority of nutrient makers are reducing that N ratio and increasing the P&K too early.
The biggest thing to understand is that they do not increase N in any way that would effect that "loss" of THC as in RM3's post on Jack's NPK value's!
The OP has found the paradox of running soil too long with out feeding.....If you read my last explanation of what happened to him you would understand what I speak of.
In the end, yes too much N will lower D9 THC BUT, what about the other THC components? D8 (the majority, by far, of the measured THC) is decarbed as we smoke it and that forms the transition to D9 and that's what we get high off from. On that note it has been discovered that certain terps effect the high also! What does that mean? I for one work on enhancing trich's and terp's!
Might as well go for broke!
The point being that consistently reducing the N throughout the bloom period does get to be a problem also! The "good" nutrient makers do that for you!
The idea that a further reduction by the so called "flush" will do "good" and keep THC levels high is,,,,,absurd!
Don't be fooled by a single study and misinterpret it! Keep feeding till done.....your not adding "extra or elevating" N levels!!
Last edited: