fluoros for flowers

johnny b. goode

Active Member
okay so what is the difference between 50k lumens on a new wave fluoro and 50k on HID ??? it's the same amount of light, just less compact? what's the deal:joint::peace::blsmoke:
 

lando421

Well-Known Member
good question, I'd like to know ...
To my knowledge the only difference, and its a big difference, would be the color spectrum.
I could be very, very wrong though.
 

johnny b. goode

Active Member
yeah the fluoro is more neutral in color I think, but still it doesn't seem like a huge difference people make it out to be

let me in on anything you find :)
 

RichardDawson

Active Member
Hey Johnny, 50k lumens as in 50,000 lumens from a flourescent light is alot. How big of a bulb is it.
But if they both put out the same amount of lumens the the difference would be that the HID puts out all of it's lumens in a more compact space.
 

TillthedayiDIE420

Well-Known Member
K, 50,000 lumens from a flourescent light is alot, thats more then 8 bulbs depending on the type... but a HPS light at 50,000 lumens will make you're buds alot more tight and covered in resin, use the fluro for VEG never use for flower....
 

Seedlessone

Well-Known Member
HID's get HOT!
this statement is VERY overrated and sweated over about. yeah HID lights produce heat, but its not very hard to control heat with some common sense. i think a lot of people dont use HID b/c heat issues are overplayed.




hey and i has not trying to single you out or anything...i was just giving some input for others to read an learn...peace out
 

heymo85

Well-Known Member
this statement is VERY overrated and sweated over about. yeah HID lights produce heat, but its not very hard to control heat with some common sense. i think a lot of people dont use HID b/c heat issues are overplayed.




hey and i has not trying to single you out or anything...i was just giving some input for others to read an learn...peace out
your right they do get hot but its very easy to conrtol..HPS wont get as hot as MH and ive always used HPS.ive met quite a few people who were scared to used HIDs because of heat,fires ect...if you have a safely setup growing environment you will have no problem because it should be well vented anyways.
 

ngtybear

Well-Known Member
It is my opinion that you can produce great results or shitty results with either HPS or floros. There are reasons to use either. I use both for flowering and only CFLs for veg. HPS tend to have a CCT of about 2100k. I like to be closer to 2700, which I can achieve with CFLs.
 

RichardDawson

Active Member
I sure hope you are only using those 2700K(soft/warm white) CFLs for flowering only, for a good vegeatative cycle one should use the 6500K(daylight) CFL.
 

ngtybear

Well-Known Member
Exactly, I am using 10 26w 6500k in my veg chamber. They grow great in there (see my avatar).
 

johnny b. goode

Active Member
K, 50,000 lumens from a flourescent light is alot, thats more then 8 bulbs depending on the type... but a HPS light at 50,000 lumens will make you're buds alot more tight and covered in resin, use the fluro for VEG never use for flower....
okay that makes sense, but I'm looking for somebody who has tried something like this in my inexperience, to honestly know if fluoros can be used in a small area for flowering... and get the sticky we all want :mrgreen:
have you tried it? anybody?
 

videoman40

Well-Known Member
While you can flower with fluoros, everything would have to be perfect to meet the quality of a hps light, yeild will suffer. One major benefit IMO, is with hps you have alot of lumens concentrated. Fluoros and hps will both create heat. IMO spend $100.00 buy the darn hps light and you are set. But if you already have the fluoros, go for it, and enjoy!
STICKY = HPS
 

MajoR_TokE

Well-Known Member
okay that makes sense, but I'm looking for somebody who has tried something like this in my inexperience, to honestly know if fluoros can be used in a small area for flowering... and get the sticky we all want :mrgreen:
have you tried it? anybody?
Many have flowered with floros and were not happy with the results. HPS is the best light you can use for flowering.
 

MajoR_TokE

Well-Known Member
okay so what is the difference between 50k lumens on a new wave fluoro and 50k on HID ??? it's the same amount of light, just less compact? what's the deal:joint::peace::blsmoke:
Go for the gold buddy, if your going to put in the time and effort why settle for second best?

If it's just a small personal stash.. why not have the best? If you can't handle it just smoke small amounts and it will last you a long time and when you friends come over you can get them balzed out of their tree.:mrgreen:

If you are dealing..
How much does lower quality weed go for in your area? I don't even buy the low quality stuff anymore but i see it all the time and know its cheaps as dirt.
How much does the high quality shit go for in your area? I know that up in my area the good weed = a very heavy wallet! $$$$$
 

Godkas

Well-Known Member
Hopefully after my CFL grow is done I can put to rest a few of the misconceptions of CFL's for flowering. I dont see any reason in the specifications as to why HPS would generate better buds.

Currently I am doing a lighting experiment using half red and half blue spectrum CFL's 2700k/5500k at 6000lumens per square foot. Come time for flowering I should be running 10,000+ lumens per square foot and be using 2/3'rds red spectrum 1/3rd blue.

Working off the general logic of the sun not losing a color range just because some flower is budding.
 

Godkas

Well-Known Member
Well the entire experiment is floating around the forums in segments. I will be compiling them into a single thread explaining my method and giving my results.
 
Top