Olive Drab Green
Well-Known Member
I think you're on the whole Communism thing. Socialism isn't just far left, you know. They range that whole span. National Socialism, or Nazism, was considered far right. Don't confuse Socialism with Communism.
Feel the Bern - the old fart that was/is into porno & has no assets, reason why he wants yours
- Thread starter Uncle Ben
- Start date
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Thank you for offering explanations, but I'd prefer not to limit my view to which of the "isms" is the less evil.
If any of the various "isms" arise from a coercion based form of government let's not confuse ANY of
them with supporting freedom. Peace.
Olive Drab Green
Well-Known Member
Swear to God, man. We have to dig up Little Willie Lincoln's bones and have them hit the campaign trail. He may have died at 12, but he's way over 35 now.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Thanks for the reminder. I need to pickup some bonemeal for a few spring projects.
Olive Drab Green
Well-Known Member
We're not talking isms, I'm just using them to convey a message we both can understand. You can't invoke left-right politics and then make fun of someone responding to you. And how about patriotism?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
I think Patriotism is fine, but doubt Tom Brady will win another Super Bowl.
I should have been clearer if you thought I was invoking left - right politics. My apologies.
I am amused by the present paradigm, and think arguing about who the best master will be, comes from an indoctrinated slave mindset. Kill your television.
Olive Drab Green
Well-Known Member
I don't have TV, myself. And, I guess that puts it into perspective, but we're not voting for an overseer, we're voting for our next public servant. If he fails to do his job and doesn't abdicate, so to speak, and you do nothing about it, then blame yourself.
Olive Drab Green
Well-Known Member
You want to see a change? Cause a change. Be a change. Just don't do nothing at all.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Not, IF... WHEN he/she fails. All of them will, all of them have.
The problem isn't which person will throw the bread into the crowd, the problem lies in the nature of the system itself.
Continuing to embrace something that is a systemic failure by replacing the President does nothing.
It's like replacing the driver of your race car that has square wheels and wondering why it's still slow.
Psst....It's not the driver.
Olive Drab Green
Well-Known Member
Like I said, if he/she/they refuse to vacate the presidency, the People should be ousting, overthrowing, and replacing them as is their right. If peaceful means totally fail, I believe it is the right of the People to revolt. If you do nothing, then you're an accomplice to the evil you oppose.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so you didn;t describe pedophilia as "a voluntary agreement", state that you would not call the cops on your neighbor raping 10 year old kids, and state that an 11 year old could consent to have sex with an 87 year old?
as i recall, you have said all of those things, which pretty much makes you a pedophile.\
what is it with you libertarians and pedophilia?
researching
Well-Known Member
If you think they actually serve us you are mistaken. They only serve themselves.
A lot of socialist people I have interacted with are all very similar. Typically slovenly, lazy people with no true understanding of self worth. They would rather take it from someone else. Essentially parasites looking for a host. And nearly no parasite has a value other than for them being a food source for others. Unfortunately in the human realm they have no value at all. Anybody with their hand out looking for a handout should have it removed.
Olive Drab Green
Well-Known Member
You're looking too hard at the concept and not hard enough at the candidate. And, I wouldn't consider myself a socialist, necessarily, just a "humanist," kind of like the humanistic school of psychology? And, being a combat veteran, I think I've proven I'm not lazy. Stereotypy, however, is a lazy rebuttal at best.
Uncle Ben
Well-Known Member
As president of the U.S. & a world leader, goddamn right it's our business.
His past character is a statement about what he is.It's a lot more than a porn issue, he reflects how he feels toward women as nothing more than sex objects. You can idolize your Ron Jeremys all you want, the White House is not the place for that shit witness Bill Clinton who was impeached. I want a person of moral character in the White House as a role model for our kids and such.
Speaking of role models - that leaves out both of the Democratic scum bags. No one trusts Hillary as the "do you trust Hillary" polls show.
researching
Well-Known Member
Well I don't need to look any harder at him to know what he is. Also, I don't recall calling you a socialist. Additionally I said " a lot of socialists I have interacted with." Not quite a sterotype but a generality based upon my interactions. Finally... stereotypes exist because they are proportionally based upon facts and experiences.
I thank you for your service, but the fact that you served doesn't mean that you aren't lazy. I have supervised plenty of service members that are quite lazy. It's in the person, not the uniform they wear. And to say that since you served proves you are not lazy is a stereotype.
Last edited:
Olive Drab Green
Well-Known Member
Porn's not a good indicator of Presidential potential. Jefferson fathered illegitimate children to one(?) of his slaves, and you can't say he wasn't a patriot and a good President.As president of the U.S. & a world leader, goddamn right it's our business.
It's a lot more than a porn issue, he reflects how he feels toward women as nothing more than sex objects. You can idolize your Ron Jeremy's all you want.....I want a person of moral character in the White House as a role model for our kids and such.
Speaking of role models - that leaves out both of the Democratic scum bags. No one trusts Hillary as the "do you trust Hillary" polls show.
Uncle Ben
Well-Known Member
I never said it was. it's not my fault you missed the point.
researching
Well-Known Member
Obviously it doesn't matter what presidential candidates do or have done, or what they are into, or highly questionable affiliations they have had. Just look at Mr. Barry Obama.
Olive Drab Green
Well-Known Member
But were they infantry? Haha. Well.. Can't say that, either. I knew a mortarmen who was fucking WAY outside regs. But for the most part, if you meet infantrymen, usually they aren't lazy. No lazy man, who is lazy by nature, chooses to do that shit, especially light infantry.Well I don't need to look any harder at him to know what he is. Also, I don't recall calling you a socialist. Additionally I said " a lot of socialists I have interacted with." Not quite a sterotype but a generality based upon my interactions. Finally... stereotypes exist because they are proportianally based upon facts and experiences.
I thank you for your service, but the fact that you served doesn't mean that you aren't lazy. I have supervised plenty of service members that are quite lazy. It's in the person, not the uniform they wear. And to say that since you served proves you are not lazy is a stereotype.