atheists wouldnt conduct experiments to prove that god is nonexistent, cause they already know hes none existent. thats there belief...
We also don't conduct experiments to prove the Easter Bunny, Tooth Fairy, or Santa Clause exist or don't exist.
Actually yes, he does. If you can't prove it's true then a scientist won't act as if it is. They way you have worded it is purposefully misleading, you are implying that something MUST be true if a scientist can't prove it to be false when you know, or should know, that scientists don't prove negatives.
Oh, now I understand what you're doing
I'm slow sometimes.
then what would you call the unsupported belief that one knows enough about the unknowable to claim god does not exist?
????
i wasn't aware i was implying anything, merely pointing out the limitations of science. something unproven is not decided to be either true or false, it is unknown. don't like the unknown? sorry, but that's all part of the game.
haha you just blew my mindthen what would you call the unsupported belief that one knows enough about the unknowable to claim god does not exist?
I bet you didn't know Richard Dawkins smoked and grew weed.........................i'm off to Oxford to work on my new book
I'm more along the lines of Atheist, and I argue for several reasons. 1) because christians get to run their piehole 24/7 and wash delicate minds about atheists are going to be the ruin of humanity (even though religion has proven itself to be the ruin of humanity). So I see it more as sticking up for myself than trying to change anyones mind. 2) and this is the big one here: Religion runs this country, look at our presidential election, they had to spend weeks making a big deal to prove how each one is a good church going man to get the votes. So If I am expected to live by christian ideals, follow christian rules and all in all live MY life according to someone else' religious standards, I'm going to ask a few questions and get a little argumentative.
