Flowki
Well-Known Member
Many agree MH is better for veg/early flower and dual spec onward. It isn't practical in many cases so people use MH for veg and dual spec for flower.
However I just want to theory question with a few thoughts.
When you use mh the nodes stay short and lst goes side ways easier. But then when you flower with hps the top nodes stretch up and leave behind the canopy that will then get less light lumans as you have to raise lights more from them. Even with slight bending they still stretch past the canopy that ''evolved'' around a MH light source.
So that leads onto the obvious question. Is it not better to veg with dual hps so that the plants do most of the stretching in veg but then have a canopy better evolved to the hps flower?. On top of that the leaves have set up chloro levels in veg to optimally use the same light they will get in flower. That is assuming a plant veged under hps will stretch far less once flipped under hps.
However I just want to theory question with a few thoughts.
When you use mh the nodes stay short and lst goes side ways easier. But then when you flower with hps the top nodes stretch up and leave behind the canopy that will then get less light lumans as you have to raise lights more from them. Even with slight bending they still stretch past the canopy that ''evolved'' around a MH light source.
So that leads onto the obvious question. Is it not better to veg with dual hps so that the plants do most of the stretching in veg but then have a canopy better evolved to the hps flower?. On top of that the leaves have set up chloro levels in veg to optimally use the same light they will get in flower. That is assuming a plant veged under hps will stretch far less once flipped under hps.