ginwilly
Well-Known Member
You mean undesirable like future welfare drains?
Does the Politics section have a purpose?
- Thread starter VILEPLUME
- Start date
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Yeah you're on a list somewhere for that comment now.
The politics section's purpose? 50% trolling/50% debating...in other words, exactly like National Parliment
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
No. "Future welfare drain" is an economic concept but not a eugenic one. cn
Yes.
Reading a thread or two, or actually trying to participate in any thread in the politics section, leads one to realize there is absolutely no point wasting time there.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
ah yes, I'm with you now.
I didn't mean to imply they were the same, just similar. Not abortion and Eugenics, just being pro-abortion. I find it a similar concept.
rollinbud
Active Member
Isn't that what Darwin and Natural Selection were all about? Could abortion just be another interference with Natural Selection like medical cures are?
Then we have this to consider here in the States.....
Will the stupid outbreed the clever?
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/content/latest-questions/question/2304/
This may just be the outcome of the 60's/70's
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
I haven't met an outright pro-abortionist. I am pro-choice and I am pro-concealed carry, but in both cases I would like to see that sort of deadly force used as minimally as possible. cn
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
I haven't met anyone who claims to be such but some of the arguments lead me to believe that way about them. Especially the future welfare argument. If you would rather abort someone because they MIGHT end up on welfare then I can't help but feel you are pro-abortion.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Makes sense to me. It seems a disproportionate correction.
I can see an argument raised that the globe is populated past its carrying capacity. But to address that using abortion as a major means of population control strikes me as morally unsound. To effect such a policy, voluntary abortions would not suffice. At that moment, eugenics seem inevitable.
I would like to think that at that moment, revolution becomes inevitable. Perhaps not right away, but every régime that has been that harsh with its subjects has fallen fairly quickly. China is an interesting border case: it's patronistic enough to have a population policy that includes forced abortion, and yet has just enough of a liberal core that it might yet evolve past that sort of nastiness without a revolution. But my money is on a violent realignment of some sort in our lifetimes. cn
londonfog
Well-Known Member
you mean here..you are actually posting and wasting time in the political section.
Doer
Well-Known Member
This section has no purpose if everyone agrees with the trolls. If it is just the sycophants preaching to the Choir.
But, if you are giving high humor monologues to an empty chair....that is funny. And funny to see how many people fell for the Animal Farm talking points of distaste.
If you think Clint Eastwood would risk his new movie for a halting rambling, pointless, unscripted old fartery,. you are stupid.
Just go read the transcript. Then review his priceless presentation. Most of the dogs that have a manufactured and swollowed opinion about this have never seen it.
No tele-prompter? No script? Of course! They can't edit what is in our brain, babies. This guy has been memorizing entire movie scenes, since he was a kid. You fools. Read the transcript.
That's what this Politics section means to me. Thinking.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
If it makes you feel better, I'm: anti-state (government) capital punishment, pro-life, and anti-Keynesian. I'm also not cool about inviting Obama with me camping.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Oh you're definitely retarded, back to licking windows you go.