Idk...back in time here a few pages. Im cool with j the painters definition a page or so back.
"Free will is the ability to choose the direction of your life, regardless of laws or work obligations.
free will
noun
noun:
free will; noun:
freewill
- the power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one's own discretion.
If an outside force is derailing your plans, then it is acting
against your freewill. When we talk of freewill in the philosophical sense, we're asking "is it us who choose what we do, or is it fate? Are our lives pre-determined?""
Idk what to do with quotes inside a quote at the end. That looks weird.
So, the 1st part is his set up. Idk that it fits with the def he left, but is more into the area I want to look at. Being able to choose the direction of your life. Being in control of the choices available, not just free to choose between options presented/available. I have had a flagrant disrespect for laws and the notion of authority my entire life. Not all of the laws, but the ones I felt like. A lot of lives are confined by economic/social class and work obligations severely limit personal freedoms. And trying to "come up" involves bending or breaking laws to get there.
The 2nd part is Webster's maybe. And boils it down to is it fate/predeterminism or actual volition. But, we have to assume "will" exists free or not. Like the soul. We look inside and it isn't there. The electrochemical machine inside seems to enable or create it and is necessary for it to happen. It projects it from elsewhere onto this place. There was a guy earlier going into that. Where scientist look inside cells and neurons and shit looking for where does decision making start. They Cant find it. It seems to come from outside. Projected onto this experience.
Thes last part is him explaining the frail,fragile existence of free will, and then wrapping it up succinctly for philosophy speak as predeterminism vs personal volition.
I understand everyone wants to be in control of their existence. Idk that we are. And yes, it evokes strong emotions. My arguments diminish us. And that sucks. I don't fluff our egos and say we are the apex of creation and everything is about us. I say I am nothing. I am no one. I may not even exist. Except as an idea. A character in a play. I know nothing.