That would be nice, but high CRI LEDs typically have a lower luminous efficiency than their 70-80 counterparts. So you're potentially losing photosynthetic photons for the benefit of better color rendering to the human eye.The sun is 100 cri, wouldn't the closer to 100 be best?
That would be nice, but high CRI LEDs typically have a lower luminous efficiency than their 70-80 counterparts. So you're potentially losing photosynthetic photons for the benefit of better color rendering to the human eye.
Any chance you could produce some par measurements, 80 cri vs 90 cri for the same series cob. I don't think I've ever seen that posted here anywhere, All we've got to go on is how many lumens each produce which is meaningless. You've got the li-cor and you stock the chips....so....you lose more lumens than photons.
umol/J is not that much different and the fact that theres more red should offset this slight loss
if lumens/PAR were everything wed all be growing with 6500k cobs or 450 nm monos
if radiant power is the same your photon count would go up with high CRI diodes. 1 watt of deep red light produces more photons than 1 watt of green or orange light and is more useful to plants.with all the unknown variables a comparison grow is the easiest way to determine which is bestIt would be nice to have the high CRI w/o losing Photons in one cob. If that were the case, I'd say yes all day.
What was the total weight for each? Less larf is good but I'm curious what the final weights areI have done a side by side with 4000k 80 vs. 3200k 95+ CRI and the high CRI produced less larf. This was less than a 5% difference in weight and less than 1% difference in THC test. I think the extra stretch helped the high CRI. The lux meter shows that the high CRI is 10% less, but the plants said something else.