Take a look at this and you decide
Rx Green’s research study on cannabis flushing explores the truth behind this urban myth in growing nutrients.
www.rxgreentechnologies.com
From your article...
- Rx Green Technologies evaluated the effects of different flushing times on chemical profile, flavor, and smoking characteristics in Cannabis flower.
- Flushing periods of 14, 10, 7 and 0 days were imposed on Cherry Diesel.
- No differences were detected between flush treatments for yield, potency, or terpenes.
No difference yield potency or terps. Why keep feeding for 2 additional weeks then? Cause a nutrient manufactures "scientific" study says so?
So weve now determined there are zero benefits to NOT flushing. Then check this
Flower samples taken the day before harvest were analyzed for content of essential plant nutrients. Overall, there was no significant change in the mineral content of flower as a result of different flushing treatments (Figure 3). In Cannabis flushed for 14 days, nitrogen was 6.7% lower than the zero-day flush treatment (Figure 3a). Continuing to feed nitrogen can increase its concentration in the plant, reducing the need for the plant to use its reserves for essential functions. Phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, and sulfur were similar for all four flushing treatments (Figure 3a-b).
Lowers nitro by 6.7%? And this "scientific" study passes this off as insignificant. Save money on nutes and time mixing them and considerably lower nitrogen content. Did you even read the article you posted..?