Did Ron Paul Win Iowa, Nevada, Minnesota, Colorado and Missouri?

UncleBuck · Feb 15, 2012

HiloReign said:
You can keep nit-picking, Romney Crooks & Co. actions speak as such. Uncle Sadface today hahahaha.

and there's the admission that there is no proof that voter fraud was committed, despite several attempts to label the video as such (see post 762).

doesn't really matter anyway, ronald & company has made it clear that he has utter disregard for the will of the voters anyway.

ronald knows what you want better than you do!

lifegoesonbrah · Feb 15, 2012

UncleBuck said:
that same video has already been posted, ya know. nowhere does it say that voter fraud was committed.

[video=youtube;pqsyzTrWS0g]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqsyzTrWS0g&feature=youtu.be[/video]

^New Ben Swann video^

******VOTER FRAUD*********************

Even though the straw votes don't technically matter, they do sway voters in following states. Furthermore, if they are going to hold said straw votes, they should at least count all the votes... I don't think that is being a crybaby, but common sense.

lifegoesonbrah · Feb 15, 2012

UncleBuck said:
ronald knows what you want better than you do!

The desire of the people to be elected delegates has nothing to do with Ron Paul, that is people standing up for their beliefs and using the delegate system properly. Ron Paul isn't "stealing" the delegates.

UncleBuck · Feb 15, 2012

lifegoesonbrah said:
^New Ben Swann video^

******VOTER FRAUD*********************

Even though the straw votes don't technically matter, they do sway voters in following states. Furthermore, if they are going to hold said straw votes, they should at least count all the votes... I don't think that is being a crybaby, but common sense.

that video has already been posted and although i have not watched it, i am willing to wager that there is no proof of voter fraud. that would be the type of thing that gets more attention than some home schooler with a ron paul crush.

and i also think they should count all the votes, too. chances are likely that romney will STILL prevail in the vote count.

lifegoesonbrah said:
The desire of the people to be elected delegates has nothing to do with Ron Paul, that is people standing up for their beliefs and using the delegate system properly. Ron Paul isn't "stealing" the delegates.

when did i say he was stealing delegates?

all i said is that he is ignoring the will of the voters and it has been noted that his followers have been deceitful in saying who they support.

and as i continue to point out, if the shoe were on the other foot, you guys would be crying conspiracy until the cows came home.

HiloReign · Feb 15, 2012

You have zero defense to any argument, all you have to say is "why isn't everything black and white for my tiny brain?" Sorry little baby, I can't hand feed you.

I also suppose that's why you can't figure out what's unveiling itself in front of you.

"The voters lied guys! Not the crooked politicians!"

lifegoesonbrah · Feb 15, 2012

Im sorry am I mixing apples and oranges here? Am I asking too much that you become informed of whats going on in Maine by watching various reporters and looking at the facts. Instead you refuse to look at the info and just deny that it is true. My theory that you are 12 is reinforced. Quit pandering, you said that Ron Paul is ignoring the will of the people, how is that not suggesting that he is under-minding the system and using delegate tactics unrepresentative of the people? Stop posting here if you don't know WTF is going on.

jdillinger · Feb 15, 2012

UncleBuck said:
that video has already been posted and although i have not watched it, i am willing to wager that there is no proof of voter fraud. that would be the type of thing that gets more attention than some home schooler with a ron paul crush.

and i also think they should count all the votes, too. chances are likely that romney will STILL prevail in the vote count.

when did i say he was stealing delegates?

all i said is that he is ignoring the will of the voters and it has been noted that his followers have been deceitful in saying who they support.

and as i continue to point out, if the shoe were on the other foot, you guys would be crying conspiracy until the cows came home.

Watch it dude there is clear voter fraud, like where they didn't count caucuses, I won't just say this for ron paul though, this charlie webster guy is a really dodgy dude, This happened in the last election as well, 2008 and some elections in 2011, seriously this guy, might not have been paid off but serious voter/(maybe election) fraud took place, regardless corruption or incompitence plagues the Maine GOP. Ron Paul may have won, but even if he didn't it Maine seriously needs to be reformed.

UncleBuck · Feb 15, 2012

jdillinger said:
Watch it dude there is clear voter fraud, like where they didn't count caucuses, I won't just say this for ron paul though, this charlie webster guy is a really dodgy dude, This happened in the last election as well, 2008 and some elections in 2011, seriously this guy, might not have been paid off but serious voter/(maybe election) fraud took place, regardless corruption or incompitence plagues the Maine GOP. Ron Paul may have won, but even if he didn't it Maine seriously needs to be reformed.

certain caucuses were not counted because they did not get the results in on time. other questions also remain, but no proof of voter fraud has come up YET. that is all i am pointing out.

UncleBuck · Feb 15, 2012

HiloReign said:
You have zero defense to any argument, all you have to say is "why isn't everything black and white for my tiny brain?" Sorry little baby, I can't hand feed you.

I also suppose that's why you can't figure out what's unveiling itself in front of you.

"The voters lied guys! Not the crooked politicians!"

lol, u mad.

lifegoesonbrah said:
Im sorry am I mixing apples and oranges here? Am I asking too much that you become informed of whats going on in Maine by watching various reporters and looking at the facts. Instead you refuse to look at the info and just deny that it is true. My theory that you are 12 is reinforced. Quit pandering, you said that Ron Paul is ignoring the will of the people, how is that not suggesting that he is under-minding the system and using delegate tactics unrepresentative of the people? Stop posting here if you don't know WTF is going on.

there is some "under-minding" going on here, LOL!

so suppose ron paul won a precinct with 300 votes to romney's 120 and santorum's 100 votes. that precinct has to send 5 delegates to the convention, and they send 5 santorum delegates. would you be sitting here defending that? i am betting that you would be crying about how santorum is undermining the will of the people.

eyesky · Feb 15, 2012

Face it people the GOP wants and hopes Romney will get the nod as they see it as his turn..... And so does the left, as he is truly the unelectable one and we all know it.

Even more so both the left and the right are afraid that the ones who voted for change in 08 may actuality in fact vote for Paul this time around...!

I look at most of these polls with a :???:

since most people I talk with "left, right, rich, poor, pot head, non pot head all say they support Paul. Maybe they are not voting, but still I have a :???:

AWAY!

HiloReign · Feb 15, 2012

Thank you for admitting defeat. The only notion of "mad" came from you. You may now call me Uncle HiloReign, kiddo.

UncleBuck · Feb 15, 2012

eyesky said:
...most people I talk with "left, right, rich, poor, pot head, non pot head all say they support Paul.

works every time, 70% of the time.

so sad that scientific surveys of thousands of americans do not reflect your more limited reality. another conspiracy?

UncleBuck · Feb 15, 2012

HiloReign said:
Thank you for admitting defeat. The only notion of "mad" came from you. You may now call me Uncle HiloReign, kiddo.

defeat? that would suppose you actually made some type of argument in the first place, which is not the case.

u just mad, bro.

FilthyFizzle · Feb 15, 2012

There is a good chance RP could have won in Maine. Washington County postponed their caucus until this Saturday because of a snowstorm, their votes were never cast. I'm not sure what the status is on it right now but I don't think the GOP wants to count their votes. Romney won the state by 200+- votes which would be easy to beat if Washington county was given the chance. I guess they are expecting a record turnout if they allow the caucus. I hope they let the people be heard

FilthyFizzle · Feb 15, 2012

eyesky said:
Face it people the GOP wants and hopes Romney will get the nod as they see it as his turn..... And so does the left, as he is truly the unelectable one and we all know it.

Obama wants Romney to get it so he can beat him in the elections. There is no dem or rep its all the same agenda.

lifegoesonbrah · Feb 15, 2012

UncleBuck said:
lol, u mad.

there is some "under-minding" going on here, LOL!

so suppose ron paul won a precinct with 300 votes to romney's 120 and santorum's 100 votes. that precinct has to send 5 delegates to the convention, and they send 5 santorum delegates. would you be sitting here defending that? i am betting that you would be crying about how santorum is undermining the will of the people.

Well you have proved one thing, don't trust auto correct. Your proposed scenario would not occur because Santorum doesn't have grassroots support and therefore he isn't going to have an overwhelming number of delegates. I wouldn't be complaining that he is UNDERMINING the system, I would be complaining that Ron Paul supporters are uninformed with the system and/or don't care enough to become part of the electoral process. Now that I have answered that stop parroting it.

UncleBuck · Feb 15, 2012

FilthyFizzle said:
There is a good chance RP could have won in Maine. Washington County postponed their caucus until this Saturday because of a snowstorm, their votes were never cast. I'm not sure what the status is on it right now but I don't think the GOP wants to count their votes. Romney won the state by 200+- votes which would be easy to beat if Washington county was given the chance. I guess they are expecting a record turnout if they allow the caucus. I hope they let the people be heard

with similar turnout in 2008 statewide, let's take a look at washington county results and see if it is enough to hand it to ronald the paul, exalted millionaire who knows better than you and your fellow voters what you want...

washington county cast a whopping 113 votes. if each and every vote were for ronald the paul, exalted millionaire who knows better than you and your fellow voters what you want, that would not overcome the difference.

out of those 113 votes, a whopping 8 of them were for ron paul. only 8!

for the record, mitt romney outperformed ron paul in waldo county in 2008 as well. not sure what the third county is that has wonky results, but if someone tells me, i can look it up.

stats taken from here: http://mysite.verizon.net/mark.j.ellis/Caucus Tally Report.pdf

HiloReign · Feb 15, 2012

You even went so far as to post pictures for me, I'm honored. And yes you heard me Mr. E-peen, I made you look like a damned fool and you're angry to death about it. Thank you for supporting Ron Paul by making his supporters (i.e you) look like "lolumad" ornery, forum-mongering fools. I've had enough stealing candy from Young Buck.

HiloReign · Feb 15, 2012

Yes, I underlined it, italicized it and made it bold.

UncleBuck · Feb 15, 2012

lifegoesonbrah said:
...Ron Paul supporters are uninformed with the system and/or don't care enough to become part of the electoral process....

well, that's a lie and you know it.

you would never blaspheme at the altar of Paul like that. you have been anointed as one of his worshippers, not one of his supporters.

lifegoesonbrah said:
But this is about clear voter fraud, the only county that Ron Paul won in 2008 had its elections canceled by a Mitt Romney supporter due to a light snow drizzle in MAINE of all places.

you got your facts wrong in an attempt to prove a non-existent conspiracy.

the only county ronald took in 2008 was arostook county, and they voted in the caucus this year. washington county was the one that got postponed, the county where ron paul got 8 votes out of 113 in 2008.

get your facts straight before you try to rail about a conspiracy, einstein.

Did Ron Paul Win Iowa, Nevada, Minnesota, Colorado and Missouri?

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads