• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

darren wilson's star witness caught in a pack of lies

MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you guys kept telling us that josie had a dozen witnesses lined up in support of wilson.

but there is only one.

what's with all these lies from you guys?
Click to expand...

Though Wilson has not spoken publicly about his side of the story, an alleged friend of the officer, identified only as Josie, shared what she claimed to be Wilson’s recollection of events. CNN later confirmed that the woman’s account matches Wilson’s account of the shooting, according to their law enforcement sources.
Click to expand...


Where in my post that you chose to quote, does it say anything about multiple witnesses? This was a C&P of an article in response to London's request about the officer's account. You're trying to hard and failing. You do understand people reading this pathetic attempt see right through it?

Now again, citation required or stfu.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
Where in my post that you chose to quote, does it say anything about multiple witnesses? This was a C&P of an article in response to London's request about the officer's account. You're trying to hard and failing. You do understand people reading this pathetic attempt see right through it?

Now again, citation required or stfu.
Click to expand...
you are literally retarded.

http://nypost.com/2014/08/19/witnesses-say-ferguson-teen-attacked-cop-before-shooting/

“Police sources tell me more than a dozen witnesses have corroborated cop’s version of events in shooting,” St. Louis Post-Dispatch crime reporter Christine Byers tweeted, without elaborating.

only one witness corroborated wilson's story. none of the other 18 said he charged the officer.
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you are literally retarded.

http://nypost.com/2014/08/19/witnesses-say-ferguson-teen-attacked-cop-before-shooting/

“Police sources tell me more than a dozen witnesses have corroborated cop’s version of events in shooting,” St. Louis Post-Dispatch crime reporter Christine Byers tweeted, without elaborating.

only one witness corroborated wilson's story. none of the other 18 said he charged the officer.
Click to expand...
That's a nice copy and paste of some article I couldn't give a shit about and has NOTHING to do with my post you quoted. You said I personally made the claim and I lied.

Back that shit up with a quote of a post that MuyLocoNC made stating such, or STFU.

YOU are literally retarded and a liar.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
That's a nice copy and paste of some article I couldn't give a shit about and has NOTHING to do with my post you quoted. You said I personally made the claim and I lied.

Back that shit up with a quote of a post that MuyLocoNC made stating such, or STFU.

YOU are literally retarded and a liar.
Click to expand...
so you cite "josie" and now you deny believing what the person you cited has to say?

unbelievably retarded.
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
so you cite "josie" and now you deny believing what the person you cited has to say?

unbelievably retarded.
Click to expand...
I'm gonna let you off the hook on this one. It's getting embarrassing for you and I'm bored. Be a little more careful with the accusations of lying and racist and you won't have to keep backpeddling from your statements. Goodnight.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
I'm gonna let you off the hook on this one. It's getting embarrassing for you and I'm bored. Be a little more careful with the accusations of lying and racist and you won't have to keep backpeddling from your statements. Goodnight.
Click to expand...
so you cited josie because you thought she was a liar?
 
SnapsProvolone

SnapsProvolone

Well-Known Member
I'm definitely NOT impressed by the way the community reacted to the lack of indictment. That said, I'm equally unimpressed with the way the prosecutor fed the grand jury, should we all be so lucky as to have a prosecutor that doesn't aggressively cross examine the accused.

Jay Nixon handled matters with such lack of zeal as to be confused with a $20 crack whore.

Frankly, we're all fucked, idiocracy.
 
SmokeyDan

SmokeyDan

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Click to expand...
This is proof that there shouldn't have been a charge.

If this accurately represents the totality of witness testament it amounts to 0.

You couldn't find any facts from that could you?

Therefore you have Wilson's version of events (not to be taken as truth ) to compare to the physical evidence of the crime scene.

Apparently his version fit the scene. Had it not it would have looked bad on his guilt.

But it did.
 
SnapsProvolone

SnapsProvolone

Well-Known Member
Exactly, if not interested in prosecuting, why bother with a grand jury other than to deflect and buy time.

Calls for a special prosecutor were well warranted.
 
reddan1981

reddan1981

Well-Known Member
possible observation 4, officer (oblivious to subtle prejudices and racist tendencies employed throughout his training) carried out his duties and acted on his perception of the event. Not understanding his perception was steered to fear a certain social category. The judge acting with political sensitivity could not act morally.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top