Creation, Destruction, Preservation

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Fin, buddy, pal, old cock....

The evidence is right there man, here let me help; you seem to have trouble with trivial tasks and interpreting the basics of the English language.

CLICK HERE FINSHAGGY

FIRST LINK SAYS THIS;
"The Pyramid Texts were a collection of Egyptian mortuary prayers,
hymns, and spells intended to protect a dead king or queen and ensure
life and sustenance in the hereafter. The texts, inscribed on the
walls of the inner chambers of the pyramids [from c. 2686-c. 2160
BC]., are found at Saqqarah in several 5th- and 6th-dynasty pyramids,
of which that of Unas, last king of the 5th dynasty, is the earliest
known. The texts constitute the oldest surviving body of Egyptian
religious and funerary writings available to modern scholars."

-Encyclopedia Britannia-


SECOND LINK SAYS THIS;
The Rigveda of Hinduism is proposed to have been composed between 1700–1100 BCE[2] making it possibly the world's oldest religious text still in use.

THIRD LINK;
Has a table of written languages used before 1000BC, most of which pre-date the Hindu writings.

Here's an excerpt from just above the table;
"A very limited number of languages are attested from before the Bronze Age collapse and the rise of alphabetic writing: The Sumerian, Hurrian, Hattic and Elamite language isolates, Afro-Asiatic in the form of the Egyptian and a number of ancient Semitic languages, Indo-European (Anatolian languages, Mycenaean Greek and traces of Indo-Aryan[1][2][3]), and Sino-Tibetan (Old Chinese). There are a number of undeciphered Bronze Age records, like the Linear A (encoding a possible "Minoan language", Proto-Elamite and a "Harappan language" (Indus script)."


So, in less than 2 minutes, and by typing 5 words, I proved you wrong.

Seems like 85% of what you say is incorrect based solely on ignorance. All of the evidence is right at your finger tips, you're just too stupid/lazy/stubborn to find it.
You seem to have misunderstood what I said.

I just said I personally doubted his correctness, based on the past.
NOT that I flat out thought he was wrong.

Thank you for doing the leg work for me though :)
Seriously, Thanks.
And you didn't prove me wrong, Midphuk did :lol:

You just got over excited about my doubt :lol:
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
ive come to think that many "gods" of ancient past. were just people whose legend just grew and grew.
I think they are just describing aspects of man and the universe.

The Rig Veda, was an attempt at writing EVERYTHING down.

The phenomenon are given human qualities, so that ANYONE can understand how they work.
But but it is just a description of what is...

Shiva IS the fact that old things fall and new things rise...
And the fact that there is a love of weed in humans...
Shiva is everything that they say he is.

BUT this only means that these things are real, because Shiva was only written as a description of what has been before, and what has been recognized in that manner...

Shiva is an aspect of life.
Shiva is a view of life, and a way of life.
A way of thought, and a way of doing. While at the same time, it is what you already are.

Shiva is a generalization of the man that has destroyed his own ego, and can see into the universe/worlds structure. With the help of Shiva's tools.
 

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
No you haven't or I wouldn't always ask for evidence, THEN say you never prove anything. And that's ALWAYS how it goes :lol:
You are so full of shit. Name one thing where I have failed to provide evidence. Just because you didn't accept my evidence as valid, doesn't mean it wasn't provided. I also had multiple people backing up what I said and trying to explain to you why you were so wrong yet you just kept posting "Nooooo, LOL!" as if that was an legitimate counter argument.

The funny thing is you argue with me about things that are in my wheelhouse. I have 2 advanced science degrees, one a doctorate and you have yet to complete any undergraduate work.
 

sso

Well-Known Member
I think they are just describing aspects of man and the universe.

The Rig Veda, was an attempt at writing EVERYTHING down.

The phenomenon are given human qualities, so that ANYONE can understand how they work.
But but it is just a description of what is...

Shiva IS the fact that old things fall and new things rise...
And the fact that there is a love of weed in humans...
Shiva is everything that they say he is.

BUT this only means that these things are real, because Shiva was only written as a description of what has been before, and what has been recognized in that manner...

Shiva is an aspect of life.
Shiva is a view of life, and a way of life.
A way of thought, and a way of doing. While at the same time, it is what you already are.

Shiva is a generalization of the man that has destroyed his own ego, and can see into the universe/worlds structure. With the help of Shiva's tools.
possibly :)

and probably.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
You are so full of shit. Name one thing where I have failed to provide evidence. Just because you didn't accept my evidence as valid, doesn't mean it wasn't provided. I also had multiple people backing up what I said and trying to explain to you why you were so wrong yet you just kept posting "Nooooo, LOL!" as if that was an legitimate counter argument.

The funny thing is you argue with me about things that are in my wheelhouse. I have 2 advanced science degrees, one a doctorate and you have yet to complete any undergraduate work.
NOOOOOOOOOO
The "Noooo Lol"s were always accompanied by points, they were never written alone. :lol: LOL LOL

Just like this ^^^^^^ :lol:

You always had people on your side, but again you NEVER provide evidence.
Like go re-read the black hole thread.
Or the alien thread.

Like for real. Read.
 

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
NOOOOOOOOOO
The "Noooo Lol"s were always accompanied by points, they were never written alone. :lol: LOL LOL

Just like this ^^^^^^ :lol:

You always had people on your side, but again you NEVER provide evidence.
Like go re-read the black hole thread.
Or the alien thread.

Like for real. Read.
So just like previously when I challenged you to link to one of my posts that you had a problem with, you puss out and tell me to go read it myself. Well I have and I provided both links and explanatory evidence. You kept arguing in spite of YOUR lack of any evidence. I provided evidence including links that shows how electromagnetism is a much stronger force by magnitudes than gravity, to which you just said, "noooo" and failed to proved counter evidence except what you 'believe.' I showed how you were incorrect that gravity has a 'speed' on earth and that it actually causes acceleration (a change in speed over time) but is different depending on your location and altitude. I provided evidence that your interpretation of GR is incorrect and that gravity affects time and your personal clock slows down the closer you are to a gravitational field and also slows down when you move through space. I provided multiple lines of evidence to demonstrate black holes are a reality. You subsequently discounted the evidence but stop lying by saying I NEVER provided any. That is patently untrue and everyone can go read the threads and see for themselves. Of course the conclusion they will come up with is that you are lying. Are you sure you want to go there?

All of these concepts are well known and mostly understood by physicists yet you continued to argue the points even after I provided links that back up everything I said. Unless you have a different idea about what constitutes evidence, I really don't know what evidence I NEVER provided and since you are unwilling to actually tell me, I have no way to correct this incorrect idea of yours.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Whatever.

You never prove shit... ................................................................................................<<<<<
I wasn't trying to argue. I was just saying I wasn't going to believe you right away, because ^^^

I believe you though. Beef is quit showed me you were right :)

Be happy :D
 

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
Whatever.

You never prove shit... ................................................................................................<<<<<
Your standards for proof are unreasonable.

I wasn't trying to argue. I was just saying I wasn't going to believe you right away, because ^^^
You don't want to argue yet instead of merely thanking me for the links and say that you will look into it or something, you respond with shit like, "But I don't believe you, I think this is the ONLY evidence you've ever given of anything.
And usually you are...less than helpful...When it comes to discussion with me" ?
And in this same post where you claim to not want to argue, you say shit like, "You never prove shit."

You still haven't ever given me one thing where I failed to produce evidence yet still banter on about my lack of proof. You're a punk know-it-all kid that has a lot to learn, especially when it comes to respecting people that know more than you and trying to help. I've seen you act the same childish way in the threads on concentrates with people that have been successfully doing it for almost as long as you've been alive.

Stop disrespecting others and maybe they won't feel the need to argue back to you.
 
Top