Colorado Med Growers, Unite

T

THseaman

Guest
Th.

Like I already said, I think 20 plants is about the top number you can grow and claim it is only for personal use(unless you only use edibles), and that's assuming you're doing a perpetual grow with plants in different development stages so that you can harvest every month The current laws allow you to get a much higher plant count with a doctors recommendation, and I have that recommendation. I'm actually following all the rules and making sure that i have all the right documentation before I start doing things. My concern is that there are too many growers that aren't following the rules, and that they are going to end up messing it up for all the rest of us that do.
Your doctor's recommendation for more plants is little more protection than a standard recommendation. You are operating under the area of the affirmative defense if you go over 6 plants per license. You know that right? The practice of recommending higher plant counts is about as ethical as dispensaries telling patients they can still grow their own 6 plants after they assign them as their caregiver. Both of these practices would go away if dispensaries didn't have patients or grow plants.
 
Someone posted earlier their doctor wrote something out to increase their plant total from 6 to 20.
The reason was use for edibles. I believe they quoted an increase of your State MMR fee is $110, making it $200 annually.

Is this info correct? And are you holding the docs reccom paper only, or does the State acknowledge in writing your change of limits?

In my case: It was not more $ to the state and I keep the script for additional plants. The state certificate says nothing for any additional.
 

DannyGreenEyes

Well-Known Member
Danny,

If your selling a product thats intended for resale at the retail level then you really should have a business license, and you need to be filing sales taxes for the city,county, and state every month even if all your sales are tax exempt. The state isn't going to care about the guy that sells an ounce here or there and doesn't make much of a profit, but the guys that are selling large amounts to the dispensaries are going to start being regulated sooner or later. Not to mention the fact that getting a business license and keeping proper accounting records lets you turn all your equipment costs and grow expenses into write off's from your income for tax purposes.

Like I said before, now that the business is legal people are going to have to get used to a whole new way of doing things, including dealing with all the red tape every other type of business has to put up with. Little things like workers compensation insurance, liability insurance, paying social security and medicare taxes, complying with OSHA standards, and a host of other little costs and expenses. For example, do you have a burglar alarm for your commercial grow area? And if so, did you remember to pay the extra annual fee to the police to have them actually respond if it goes off? Are you keeping track of all your revenues and expenses using the proper accounting methods? If not the IRS is going to enjoy auditing you. I've talked to a lot of people who are growing commercially in the last few months, and most of them aren't even thinking about this kind of stuff.

As for the 40 plant limit, I suppose it's possible if all you use is edibles, but it's still enough to raise some eyebrows. Most people are going to assume with that many plants that you have to have excess you're selling someplace. Like yourself I'm able to get a much higher plant count then I have currently, and i agree that anything over 20 is just going to make you a target. I'm still deciding exactly how many I'm going to need to have growing in the long term, and I'm thinking 16-20 is just about right if I want to set up a rotation of plants to run from seedling to harvest so that I'm harvesting 4-5 plants each month.

BTW, if any of you are really looking at doing this commercially and need some help with the accounting let me know. I make my living as a cost accountant, so I'm very good at that side of things. I avoid income tax related work like the plague though, so I can't give definite answers about them. That's what CPA's are for. :)
I'd love it if there was a business license for this because it would provide a level of security in the fact that I'm not going to get raided by a cowboy cop that just wants to be a pain in my ass because he doesn't like the new laws. It would also provide a set of rules, well defined rules (hopefully) to follow and everyone would know what's OK and what's not OK. But the license does not exist. If you don't beleive me, go down to the local licensing office (COC, State Licensing Office, or which ever office issues business licenses in CO) and try to get yourself a growers license. The classification for it does not exist, plain & simple.

I ran a small business for 7 years in NYC, FL, & NY State. When I moved to Palm Harbor, FL I was suprised to learn that they don't even issue licenses for home based businesses. And in NYC & NYS they didn't have a classification for what I did, and I sold retail merchandise to independent retail stores. However when I showed up to get a business license I told them what I did and they gave me a license for what ever they considered to be a similar business, which in most cases was Distributor, and they were very friendly about the whole thing. Even though that's not really what I did, they had no problem giving me a license for a different but similar business. You go down to the licensing office and tell them you want a license so you can grow MJ at home & sell it to the dispensories, and you tell me what they tell you. No fucking way is what they're gonna tell you, and they wont find a similar business to sell you a license for, and I bet they wont be as friendly or couteous either.

I would love having a license that says I'm allowed to grow x number of plants and sell to dispensories in a determined area, and that I can transport a certain ammount of weight. But there isn't one so when I harvest I'll have to take samples to dispensories, come to an agreed upon price, and have them pick it up. The whole time holding my breath & praying that the cops don't kick down my door and take my grow equip, my plants, and my meds.

When I ran my business I payed taxes quarterly, and I hired a tax attourney to file them for me. I see no reason to change that method of paying my taxes. If a reason ever presents itself I'll adapt. But paying taxes monthly? That's just not possible unless you have a book keeper on the payroll. And then that's no loner a sole proprietorship, is it?

The thing I like best about this business is it's a cash business. When I ran my other business I was ripped off for close to $200k in 7 years simply because the credit card industry isn't regulated. That's right, a business that does billions of dollars in business each & every day isn't regulated, and it's been in existance for how long? 15yrs? 20yrs? 25yrs? So please don't preach to me about regulations because you're preaching to the choir.

And your wrong about the guy that sells an ounce here and an ounce there. When the witch hunt comes, and I have no doubt that it will, those small timers are going to get steam rolled, mark my words.

And I am keeping records & a balance sheet of sorts. The same type of balance sheet that I used running my other business. It's enough for a tax attorney to get the taxes done.

I'm already use to the "the whole new way of doing things", for me it's just the same old system, at least for the time being. As long as I have no employees I have little red tape if any. The tax attorney is a private contractor and I didn't need any one elses help.

Once I figure out how to expand into a small warehouse (if that's ever possible with the laws in place) then I'll have a little red tape like insurance and a private security system (so I don't have to involve the cops who will probably cause complications). And of course I'm keeping track of my revenue & expenses. At this point my expenses have out weighed my revenue, I wonder if they'll have a subsidy for me. lmao

As far as the plant limit, that little piece of paper is between me and my Dr., & it's protected by the bill of rights. The agreement between a patient & care giver is not protected by the bill of rights. That means that the caregiver carries a lot more risk. That doesn't mean the police wont bend some federally mandated regulations to attain the information that's protected by Dr. confidentiallity laws like they did in CA a few years back, which is why I'm sticking with 20 plants. If I see 40 plant growers getting harrassed left & right I'll be able to see it coming & hopefully I'll have the money to relocate if & when that ever happens.

A 20 plant limit allows you 10 in veg & 10 in flower. To keep things simple & to avoid confusion I'll only have 8 in flower at a time, 8 in veg, and 4 mothers providing clones for my next veg. If you want to do 5 a month, be my guest, but you're the one taking foolish chances with all the prejudice cops I've been reading about.

Thanks for the offer, but I'm good at doing my own accounting. As long as I pay my income taxes I'm fine, and I only need a tax attorney once every 3 months to help me with that, and I wont need one till I start turning a profit. Sales taxes are collected by the dispensories. I'm not sure if they have a Tax ID number but it really doesn't matter. As long as I'm selling to a retailer inside my state, I don't have to keep track of tax ID numbers. And since selling across state lines is illegal, that's a problem I'll never have to deal with.

The long & short, I'm running a small home based sole proprietor business and I will run it as such until new laws are put before me. And I'll run it as carefully as I can due to the fact that this whole business is still very controversial. And I'd appreciate it if you'd back off until there's a reason to breath down my neck aobut it.
 

DannyGreenEyes

Well-Known Member
You are an MMJ elitist. MMJ is window dressing. Cannabis should be LEGAL and any adult should be allowed to grow as many plants as he or she wants. NOBODY deserves to be in the court system for cannabis!
I agree, but the laws are the laws and unless you want to deal with the consequeces, you have to follow the laws.

One step at a time.
 

DannyGreenEyes

Well-Known Member
I'm only growin one :bigjoint:

Not just talking about the 6 plant limit, the disp owners, the doctors, it's all just gotten crazy and out of hand

it's the reason that they are looking at limiting the # of patients (not sayin it will happen) but if it does all of the disp close as soon as it goes into effect, they can't stay open with only 5 patients each

and it is the rush for green $$$ that is causing them to escalate the regulations, that is a fact!
You're wrong, it's politics that is pushing it. There are those that want to shut this down, outlaw MJ nation wide again, and even make the plant extinct if possible. The religious right is what's pushing the regulations.

So far the only people I've heard about gettin busted are those operating within the rules set forth.

Except that guy in Boulder that got off even though he had a lot of plants & weight. That guy didn't even have a Dr's note, and I think that it set a precident that we can all enjoy until the laws change. And they will change wether we enjoy the precident or not.

Not that I'm doing that myself. I'm just observing how the judge sided with the advocates in that case. Interesting.
 

DannyGreenEyes

Well-Known Member
Th.

Like I already said, I think 20 plants is about the top number you can grow and claim it is only for personal use(unless you only use edibles), and that's assuming you're doing a perpetual grow with plants in different development stages so that you can harvest every month The current laws allow you to get a much higher plant count with a doctors recommendation, and I have that recommendation. I'm actually following all the rules and making sure that i have all the right documentation before I start doing things. My concern is that there are too many growers that aren't following the rules, and that they are going to end up messing it up for all the rest of us that do.
The religious right would disagree with you. They think 1 is too many, and anyone with a brain knows it.

And what about the guy who gets 4lbs a plant? Does he get limited to a smaller ammount of plants? After all who needs 80 lbs every 2 months for personal use?

And what about the guy who gets an oz a plant? Does he get a higher limit?

And what about the 2oz quantity law? Can you harvest 8 plants and have 2oz or less?

Every time you harvest and get more thatn 2oz, you are breaking the laws. The next guy who has 40 patients and grows on a farm, he's following the laws. But you're putting the unfair persecution by the reliigeous right & the right wing-nuts on the guy who's following the laws while you ignore the fact that you're breakeing laws. Sounds a little hypocritical to me.
 

EdGreyfox

Well-Known Member
Danny,

About the business license- I haven't gone down and tried to apply for one because I have no intention of doing this commercially, but it should an agricultural license of some type. They have to be able to provide them to people who are growing commercially somehow, because a business license is a basic legal requirement to operate any type of retail or wholesale business in this state. I don't care if it's a comic book store, it has to have that retailers/wholesalers license or the city/state government can come in and shut them down any time they want.
 

DannyGreenEyes

Well-Known Member
I thought this was Colorado Med Growers UNITE?
The main problem is that Cannabis, in all forms is still illegal on the Federal level. However, united the masses can persuade positive change. Stop bickering ladies!
As for grow maximums, those are the rules. Go "buy" patients to up your allotments.
Playing by the rules means finding loop holes and exploiting them. Corporate America does this well, and so can you.

Loose lips sink ships - The first rule of fight club is.....The second rule of fight club is....Get the picture?
I agree. I've been saying since I got into this a few months ago that legal growers should pony up 10% of their net earnings so we can put together a union and get a lobyist speaking for us in DC.

But with growers pointing their fingers at other growers who are paying attention to the laws, and blaming them for the heat coming from the same place it's always come from, it doesn't seem very likely.
 

DannyGreenEyes

Well-Known Member
Someone posted earlier their doctor wrote something out to increase their plant total from 6 to 20.
The reason was use for edibles. I believe they quoted an increase of your State MMR fee is $110, making it $200 annually.

Is this info correct? And are you holding the docs reccom paper only, or does the State acknowledge in writing your change of limits?
I beleive the $110 paid was for the Dr's consultation and is not a yearly renewable thing.

She filed papers with the state ( I beleive) but it's unclear if the recomendation will hold up in a court of law.

However, with the precident set in Boulder a few weeks ago, it looks like they stand a good chance of holding up in court.
 

DannyGreenEyes

Well-Known Member
Your doctor's recommendation for more plants is little more protection than a standard recommendation. You are operating under the area of the affirmative defense if you go over 6 plants per license. You know that right? The practice of recommending higher plant counts is about as ethical as dispensaries telling patients they can still grow their own 6 plants after they assign them as their caregiver. Both of these practices would go away if dispensaries didn't have patients or grow plants.
Dude, a case came before a judge in Boulder where a man with no more than a regular 6 plant license was caught with several plants over his limit, and more than a LB of dried & cured meds. He told the judge that he needed more and the judge sided with him. Precident set. Period (unless the laws change)

There hasn't been a case in frong of a judge yet that covers the 6 plant limit if you sign someone up as a caregiver. When it does it will boil down to the judges interpertaion of the law. Simple as that.

Any judge can interpert any law as he or she sees fit. However if there has been a precident set judges will normally follow the precident.

What part is hard to understand?

Most of the laws aren't clear, and we wont get a clear understanding until a judge has ruled on it in a court of law.
 

DannyGreenEyes

Well-Known Member
Danny,

About the business license- I haven't gone down and tried to apply for one because I have no intention of doing this commercially, but it should an agricultural license of some type. They have to be able to provide them to people who are growing commercially somehow, because a business license is a basic legal requirement to operate any type of retail or wholesale business in this state. I don't care if it's a comic book store, it has to have that retailers/wholesalers license or the city/state government can come in and shut them down any time they want.
This is considered a MEDICINE, not a FOOD CROP. Standing agriculture laws so not apply.

And there has been no law set forth for growers as of yet. It's almost as if the state ignored the fact that there were going to have to be people growing if the medicine is going to come into existance.

There is nothing on the books for comercial growers or private growers, therefore no license was created. :wall:
 

EdGreyfox

Well-Known Member
Danny,

You seem to forget that I'm not just growing for myself. If all i had to worry about was my own use I could grow half the number of plants and set up my harvest schedule so that I never had more then 2 oz on hand. As it is I doubt I'll have more then 2 oz of dried stuff on hand at any given time because the other person will claim their share as soon as it's ready to start curing. There is no way to guarantee I'm not going to get more out of any given plant or harvest then I expect, but the same holds true for every other person thats growing. All I can do is try and keep my production schedule set up so that I stay as close to being under that line as i possibly can. If that means arranging things so I never harvest more then two plants at a time thats what I'll do.

As for yields per plant, once again there is no way to say. The whole thing about plant count is so subjective that it's impossible to give a definative answer to how many any person needs for personal use. I will say that most people will think that producing enough to consume 1-2 oz a week per should be adequate under most circumstances, and that if you are deliberately producing more you must be selling it or giving the excess to friends.
 

EdGreyfox

Well-Known Member
Danny,

It may be medicine, but at least currently it's not being regulated by the FDA so it should still count as an agricultural product, not a pharmaceutical.
 

DannyGreenEyes

Well-Known Member
I think I've banged my head up against the wall enough for now. I have to go to work and kill some mites. I'll be back in a few hours. But EdGreyFox, why don't you try reading the laws before going off on a tangent. Maybe you'll find out that by harvesting more than 2oz you're breaking the law just as much as a guy growing 100 plants for 30 patients when he/she harvests. The only law being broken (provided that you have your 20 plant recomendation) is the 2 oz possesion law. And the law your breaking most likely wont be held up in a court of law due to the recent precident that was set up in Boulder.

That doesn't mean you'll ever see your equipment, plants, or meds again if your'e ever raided. It just means you wont get prosecuted.

Peace.
 

DannyGreenEyes

Well-Known Member
Danny,

It may be medicine, but at least currently it's not being regulated by the FDA so it should still count as an agricultural product, not a pharmaceutical.
Ed, I don't know what to tell you. Talk to the people that wrote the laws, I had nothing to do with it.

Should be and is are often 2 very different things.

I gotta go to work.
 

Arvada

Member
I beleive the $110 paid was for the Dr's consultation and is not a yearly renewable thing.

She filed papers with the state ( I beleive) but it's unclear if the recomendation will hold up in a court of law.

However, with the precident set in Boulder a few weeks ago, it looks like they stand a good chance of holding up in court.

That's what I thought. The $110 was for a doctors visit, or other fee, but not paid to the State as MMR annual fee.
 

EdGreyfox

Well-Known Member
Danny,

Not sure where this whole conversation went wrong. You and i really aren't in disagreement about most things, I just started out trying to make the point that there are a lot of people out there that are looking at this as a commerical opportunity and they aren't following the rules for running a commercial business. The whole thing about the number of plants is just my own personal opinion about what should be adequate for most users. I admitted i could see someone needing more, but thought growing that much would make people assume you were growing it to sell.

As for the legal aspects of getting a business license as a commercial grower I'll look into it this week and see what I can find out. The state requires you have a business license to engage in any kind of retail or wholesale business, so there must be some way to go about it. It may be some convoluted logic in which the state assumes there is no commericial growing and that everyone is just growing for personal consumption, but like you said earlier, where are the dispensaries supposed to get their products if they don't have commerical growers to supply them?
 

NewGrowth

Well-Known Member
Danny,

I think the point he's making is that anyone that has more then 20 plants isn't just growing for personal use, no matter what they might claim. There are plenty of people out there that are growing more then they need for personal use because they want to sell it to the dispensaries, but those people need to admit they are growing for more then personal use and get themselves the proper documentation for the number of plants they are growing. From the states perspective a lot of these growers are acting like small businesses without bothering to get a business license or pay taxes on their profits, and they have every right to nail them for it. Sure, it's a pain to get all the legal stuff taken care of, but that's part of the cost of having it legal in the first place. It may go against the grain for a lot of long time growers and dealers, but you've now become respectable businessmen and have to learn a whole new set of rules.

I think you are very mis-informed about state involvement in the medical marijuana industry. There is no such thing as a "growers license" and I don't think government regulation is going to solve ANY of the problems we are faced with in this industry. To see people in support of further regulation really disgusts me, I fail to understand why people seem to think we in-capable of taking care of ourselves without some law enforcement officer breathing down our necks.

I sure am glad there are people like you who attempt to divide one of this country's last grass roots, local industry.:wall:
 

MileHIGHclub101

Well-Known Member
ahhh geeezzzz guyssssss.....i know its 2:30 in the morning and i know im getting a little stoned to go back to bed but man oh man guys I know we are all on the same relative page here that's the whole reason we are on here...we're not one against another...we are the few against the system...or for the system which ever way you look at it ( i told you im stoned) but the general point is. There are a lot of people out there whom aren't entirely informed and it is the jobs of those who are to let it be known the truths of things. Lets us not get bent out of shape when someone really is in need of the truth...do you hear that...wait...Why Can't We Be Friends Why Can't WE be Friends Why Can't Wee Bee friends...:lol:
 
Top