CMA Statement on Task Force Report

JungleStrikeGuy

Well-Known Member
https://www.cma.ca/En/Lists/Medias/marijuana-statement.pdf?hootPostID=3dbbbb446d022c851e0074b9d0dcbf58

While pleased that the report of the Task
Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation strongly
recommends enhanced research and education, the CMA is disappointed that the Task Force has
called for a separate medical access framework in Canada.


The PDF breaks formatting when a copy/paste so that's all I'll put into this post from it, but needless to say the CMA desperately wants out of medical cannabis.
 

willieboy

Well-Known Member
ee more news releases in
CMA Statement on Report of Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation








OTTAWA, Dec. 13, 2016 /CNW/ - The Canadian Medical Association (CMA) is pleased that the final report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation recommends that the government take a broad public health policy approach to address the legalization and regulation of marijuana for non-medical use.

A public health approach places an increased focus on:

  • preventing drug abuse and dependence;
  • lessening the impact on vulnerable groups such as children;
  • ensuring the availability of assessment, counselling and treatment services for those who wish to stop using; and
  • promoting harm reduction to increase the safety for those who are using.
This approach also seeks to ensure that the harms associated with enforcement are not out of proportion to the direct damages caused by substance abuse.

Monitoring, surveillance and research of marijuana use are essential to this approach so that we can better understand the short and long-term harm as well as to develop policy options to address prevention, treatment, harm reduction and enforcement.

While pleased that the report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation strongly recommends enhanced research and education, the CMA is disappointed that the Task Force has called for a separate medical access framework in Canada.

The CMA recognizes that some individuals suffering from terminal illness or chronic disease for which conventional therapies have not been effective may obtain relief with marijuana used for medical purposes. However, clinical evidence of medical benefits is limited.

There is also very limited guidance for the therapeutic use, including indications, potency (levels of THC, CBD), interactions with medications and adverse effects. Health Canada does not approve of marijuana as a medicine, as it has not gone through the approvals required by the regulatory process to be a pharmaceutical. The present system poses a serious challenge for physicians in providing the best care to patients.

The CMA continues to recommend that there be only one regime for marijuana, following legalization of non-medical marijuana, with provisions for the medical needs of those who would not be able to acquire marijuana in a legal manner, such as those below the minimum age or those who require a more potent product than legally available.

Dr. Granger Avery,
CMA President

The Canadian Medical Association (CMA) is the national voice of Canadian physicians. Founded in 1867, the CMA is a voluntary professional organization representing more than 83,000 of Canada's physicians and comprising 12 provincial and territorial medical associations and 60 national medical organizations. The CMA's mission is helping physicians care for patients. The CMA will be the leader in engaging and serving physicians and be the national voice for the highest standards for health and health care.
 

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
It's amazing how they dismiss the fact that no one has died, or that one of the side effects is the munchies, and the things that patients tell their docs that cannabis helps with. I can pretty much tell my doc to the gram how much I use consistently in a day, but that's not considered a dose.
 

CalyxCrusher

Well-Known Member
No problem. I want the CMA out of medical cannabis too. Anybody can buy or grow, who needs a doctor to grant you permission.
The problem that comes with this is that they are looking for any way to impose the smallest plant counts possible. I mean wtf could we do about it, medical no longer exists
 

Chef420

Well-Known Member
It's pretty interesting and I understand now why my GP didn't want anything to do with prescribing it. I've always thought that it should be treated like alcohol anyway. Tax the shit out of it. Who cares it's a win win.
Will the prescription of strains be left to holistic practitioners, a few rogue MD's that beieve in its benefits?
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
The problem that comes with this is that they are looking for any way to impose the smallest plant counts possible. I mean wtf could we do about it, medical no longer exists
I agree that is the goal. Not sure what we can do about it, but medical does still exist. They are suggesting fines rather than criminal charges, so being over might not be a big deal if it's personal / medical.
 

torontomeds

Well-Known Member
Yeah fuck it, I will pay the damn fine if need be. I think in the end it will take some time, but I think they will offer like 25 plants at home, at that point they will do away with med. But it will be hard, kind of hard to put a cat back in the bag.
 
Top