Club 600

genuity

Well-Known Member
This is not a scrog,....I just put some big ass plants under a net,it's 2 7gal pots
Under a AC/DE hood with a 630DE-R (they do make hood,that house 2 separate 315)
20170530_181402.jpg
With a Lil more love..

That Shit is all beat up,I'm about to chop it tonight..well just some fucking mites...but what ever.
 

ilovetoskiatalta

Well-Known Member
I have a 315 nanolux and they are good for veg, but they can't compare to a 600 or a 1000 for bud size and weight. The plants that matured under the 315 weighed only 2/3'rd of the 600 weight.

:peace:
cof
May I ask which bulbs you were using? I use the 4000k for veg and the 3100k for flower.
I think that electrical usage factors in with the 315cmh as well as the heat. I switched from t5 & 400mh 's in veg and 1000hps for flower.
My ballasts were magnetic.

It's just a different set up that has been effective and efficient for me.

I loved my three 1000hps but I do not have the space anymore. With that said if I did have that space again I would use the 315cmh just more of them. I have read differing opinions on how many 315 equal a
1000w hps.

I have to say my biggest issue is heat and that's why I like the 315cmh. I do not think there is much argument about how much cooler these lights run.
 

curious old fart

Well-Known Member
The bulb is a 3100k.
there is a 1000W de and 2 600's in the bloom room. I was using the 315 to fill in when the 1000 ballast went out to cover 6 plants instead of the 20+..

:peace:
cof
 

gr865

Well-Known Member
Ok so just to be clear, 2 lec 315 on a scrog will not out produce a 1000watt under the same scrog?
Not an expert on the 315's, but I switched from a 400W HPS & MH, I now have two 315's hanging in vertical grow.
20170529_112323.jpg 20170530_100539 (3).jpg
Why I switched was wanting more light in my 4x4 without the extra heat. I had planned to run a 600 and 400 HPS vert but ended up getting a good deal on the 315's and I would not go back.
I have been told by multiple sources that the 315 will produce the equivalent of 500W per light w/o the heat.
Have not grow with a 600 or 1000 but I do know that this light our proforms the 400 HPS big time.
My last incidental grow was horizontal grow with one 315 and a SS400 LED side by side and I got a total was 15 zips. I was happy with that.

GR
 

Mr.jojodancer305

Well-Known Member
Not an expert on the 315's, but I switched from a 400W HPS & MH, I now have two 315's hanging in vertical grow.
View attachment 3952132 View attachment 3952133
Why I switched was wanting more light in my 4x4 without the extra heat. I had planned to run a 600 and 400 HPS vert but ended up getting a good deal on the 315's and I would not go back.
I have been told by multiple sources that the 315 will produce the equivalent of 500W per light w/o the heat.
Have not grow with a 600 or 1000 but I do know that this light our proforms the 400 HPS big time.
My last incidental grow was horizontal grow with one 315 and a SS400 LED side by side and I got a total was 15 zips. I was happy with that.

GR
That's what I was thinking as well,that heat is a problem. I have a new green room and trying to set things up. The thought of 4 315"got me thinking and if thinvs don't work out I can hook up the 1000"s but that light bill is killer
 

Rusher

Well-Known Member
How did the Chocolate Skunk turn out for you?
It was remarkable. I'm on vacation right now, and don't have access to my photos, but I pulled 3.85 zips dry of the best tasting smoke I have ever produced. More coffee than chocolate, but a good strong smoke. Great meds.

Sadly, it seems that 00 Seeds has not produced more of the CS, but have several other chocolate strains that I will investigate in the future.
 

HydroRed

Well-Known Member
It was remarkable. I'm on vacation right now, and don't have access to my photos, but I pulled 3.85 zips dry of the best tasting smoke I have ever produced. More coffee than chocolate, but a good strong smoke. Great meds.

Sadly, it seems that 00 Seeds has not produced more of the CS, but have several other chocolate strains that I will investigate in the future.
Thanks for replying. I have grown it out as well, but have yet to find anything regarding grows for the Chocolate Skunk FEM Photoperiod. Plenty of info and grows documenting the auto version though. I was def pleased with the weight and the bud structure, just wish it were a little stronger. I could see this being very popular with cash croppers.
 

Rusher

Well-Known Member
Thanks for replying. I have grown it out as well, but have yet to find anything regarding grows for the Chocolate Skunk FEM Photoperiod. Plenty of info and grows documenting the auto version though. I was def pleased with the weight and the bud structure, just wish it were a little stronger. I could see this being very popular with cash croppers.
Interesting. I'm surprised that the auto version would draw so much attention, or perhaps that's my own dislike of autos in general. I found it to be quite strong, but that could simply be a different pheno within the strain.
 
Top