curious old fart
Well-Known Member
A 600 in each one would use less power and give better results.
cof
cof
That would be a hard fit..(depending on the hood)...the SunSystem, no way...Two 315 lec on my 4x4 scrog and 2 more on my 4 bucket plants
moreYeah the chinese sell us things really cheap cause im pretty sure they own half our country by now.
How did the Chocolate Skunk turn out for you?I'm growing the Chocolate Skunk by 00 right now in a 38L bin, topped to 16 heads (17 actually, FIM'd one) in the 2nd week of flower after a 46 day marathon of topping and torture. Truly a performer.
Edit: Pic is 2 hours old.
May I ask which bulbs you were using? I use the 4000k for veg and the 3100k for flower.I have a 315 nanolux and they are good for veg, but they can't compare to a 600 or a 1000 for bud size and weight. The plants that matured under the 315 weighed only 2/3'rd of the 600 weight.
cof
Not an expert on the 315's, but I switched from a 400W HPS & MH, I now have two 315's hanging in vertical grow.Ok so just to be clear, 2 lec 315 on a scrog will not out produce a 1000watt under the same scrog?
That's what I was thinking as well,that heat is a problem. I have a new green room and trying to set things up. The thought of 4 315"got me thinking and if thinvs don't work out I can hook up the 1000"s but that light bill is killerNot an expert on the 315's, but I switched from a 400W HPS & MH, I now have two 315's hanging in vertical grow.
View attachment 3952132 View attachment 3952133
Why I switched was wanting more light in my 4x4 without the extra heat. I had planned to run a 600 and 400 HPS vert but ended up getting a good deal on the 315's and I would not go back.
I have been told by multiple sources that the 315 will produce the equivalent of 500W per light w/o the heat.
Have not grow with a 600 or 1000 but I do know that this light our proforms the 400 HPS big time.
My last incidental grow was horizontal grow with one 315 and a SS400 LED side by side and I got a total was 15 zips. I was happy with that.
GR
It was remarkable. I'm on vacation right now, and don't have access to my photos, but I pulled 3.85 zips dry of the best tasting smoke I have ever produced. More coffee than chocolate, but a good strong smoke. Great meds.How did the Chocolate Skunk turn out for you?
Thanks for replying. I have grown it out as well, but have yet to find anything regarding grows for the Chocolate Skunk FEM Photoperiod. Plenty of info and grows documenting the auto version though. I was def pleased with the weight and the bud structure, just wish it were a little stronger. I could see this being very popular with cash croppers.It was remarkable. I'm on vacation right now, and don't have access to my photos, but I pulled 3.85 zips dry of the best tasting smoke I have ever produced. More coffee than chocolate, but a good strong smoke. Great meds.
Sadly, it seems that 00 Seeds has not produced more of the CS, but have several other chocolate strains that I will investigate in the future.
Interesting. I'm surprised that the auto version would draw so much attention, or perhaps that's my own dislike of autos in general. I found it to be quite strong, but that could simply be a different pheno within the strain.Thanks for replying. I have grown it out as well, but have yet to find anything regarding grows for the Chocolate Skunk FEM Photoperiod. Plenty of info and grows documenting the auto version though. I was def pleased with the weight and the bud structure, just wish it were a little stronger. I could see this being very popular with cash croppers.
How you.manage to grow them under that 1 cfl is just amazing. You are one with the forceLight dep coming along just fine,,, day 10-12/12
Everything is on irrigation in there.
View attachment 3953044