Bull Investigation --- 'Sham'

londonfog · Oct 5, 2018

TacoMac said:
Because Democrats can order an investigation into Trump's finances by way of impeachment for the emoluments clause.

shhhhh. Sometimes let the dumb be dumb.
It makes it less boring around here

Bear420 · Oct 5, 2018

They will plow him through just like McConnell said. He always seems to get what he wants. Freaking Hypocrite.
"Is what all of them are". this court shouldn't be stacked in anyones favor.

Get rid of electoral vote for our Presidency and also when a we need a Supreme Court Justice. Let the People vote them into that Seat. no more of this Bullshit of stacking the court the way they want too. We are the People, I don't think it's unreasonable for the people to nominate or elect a SCJ.

Just my HO.

rkymtnman · Oct 5, 2018

relaxinginUSA said:
Another political genius. How exactly, can a Democratic majority in the House result in Trump releasing his tax returns?

there's a video on youtube. check it out.

Justin-case · Oct 5, 2018

Bugeye said:
Poor baby, suggest you go pound sand.

You're not worth it, but when are you going to start crying about that bet again? It's funny.

schuylaar · Oct 5, 2018

TacoMac said:
Because Democrats can order an investigation into Trump's finances by way of impeachment for the emoluments clause.

ummmmmmmmmm, whoooops :mrgreen:

rkymtnman · Oct 5, 2018

schuylaar said:
ummmmmmmmmm, whoooops

taco bell is a bit incorrect. the dems were just granted permission by a judge to pursue trump's dc hotel monies from foreign gov'ts.

rkymtnman · Oct 5, 2018

since del taco has me on ignore, this is the correct version of how the house can do it:

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/29/trumps-tax-returns-midterms-democrats-853456

Justin-case · Oct 5, 2018

Bugeye said:
This one?
View attachment 4210859

Lol, if I knew it would bother you that much I would've joined the wager.

Bugeye · Oct 5, 2018

Justin-case said:
Lol, if I knew it would bother you that much I would've joined the wager.

Go have a good cry, I won't mock your pain.

Justin-case · Oct 5, 2018

Bugeye said:
Go have a good cry, I won't mock your pain.

Just like trump didn't mock sexual assault victims,

No love, sad.

Herb & Suds · Oct 5, 2018

gonnagro said:
Yea whatever, blah blah blah.
But then again, you snowflakes shit yourselves when Trump didn't trust the FBI or CIA during the election.. Hypocritical losers.

First Trump says the FBI is corrupt then he says the FBI is correct...Pick one !

Herb & Suds · Oct 5, 2018

relaxinginUSA said:
Another political genius. How exactly, can a Democratic majority in the House result in Trump releasing his tax returns?

Do you actually know anything other than claiming everyone knows less?

TheGreenGreek · Oct 5, 2018

gonnagro said:
Yea whatever, blah blah blah.
But then again, you snowflakes shit yourselves when Trump didn't trust the FBI or CIA during the election.. Hypocritical losers.

Exactly this. The FBI is credible when investigating Trump(until he is exonerated), They are credible when investigating Hillary because they found no evidence. But they aren't credible now because it doesn't help them knock off a Judge they do not want on the SC.

TheGreenGreek · Oct 5, 2018

Fogdog said:
They talked to nine people, I have read. It was a sham. Window dressing and an excuse for Republicans who don't care who sits on the SCOTUS just as long as they are partisans in their favor.

People who just want to see Republicans win don't want a real investigation.

The terms and scope of the investigation was agreed upon after the committee interviewed Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh. If you want to call this a sham NOW, why wasn't it a sham then when the Democrats agreed to it? Remember, it was the Republicans who voted in favor of a week extension. They honored it based on the terms set and agreed upon by all parties. You just don't like it because it is not working in your bias favor.

TacoMac · Oct 5, 2018

TheGreenGreek said:
The terms and scope of the investigation was agreed upon after the committee interviewed Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh.

No, it wasn't.

It was originally going to be a full investigation. The very next day, Trump limited the investigation to a simple interview restricted to 9 people he selected.

Justin-case · Oct 5, 2018

TheGreenGreek said:
The terms and scope of the investigation was agreed upon after the committee interviewed Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh. If you want to call this a sham NOW, why wasn't it a sham then when the Democrats agreed to it? Remember, it was the Republicans who voted in favor of a week extension. They honored it based on the terms set and agreed upon by all parties. You just don't like it because it is not working in your bias favor.

Dems "agreed" to nothing, Jeff flake requested the investigation, stupid.

Fogdog · Oct 5, 2018

schuylaar said:
trump has placed limitations on the investigation.

TheGreenGreek said:
The terms and scope of the investigation was agreed upon after the committee interviewed Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh. If you want to call this a sham NOW, why wasn't it a sham then when the Democrats agreed to it? Remember, it was the Republicans who voted in favor of a week extension. They honored it based on the terms set and agreed upon by all parties. You just don't like it because it is not working in your bias favor.

"Democrats agreed to it" = fake news.

UncleBuck · Oct 5, 2018

TheGreenGreek said:
Exactly this. The FBI is credible when investigating Trump(until he is exonerated), They are credible when investigating Hillary because they found no evidence. But they aren't credible now because it doesn't help them knock off a Judge they do not want on the SC.

There was no investigation

This was a cover up by the white house

UncleBuck · Oct 5, 2018

TheGreenGreek said:
The terms and scope of the investigation was agreed upon after the committee interviewed Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh. If you want to call this a sham NOW, why wasn't it a sham then when the Democrats agreed to it? Remember, it was the Republicans who voted in favor of a week extension. They honored it based on the terms set and agreed upon by all parties. You just don't like it because it is not working in your bias favor.

Sorry you are unable to deal in facts

Everything you just said was false

Fogdog · Oct 5, 2018

TheGreenGreek said:
Exactly this. The FBI is credible when investigating Trump(until he is exonerated), They are credible when investigating Hillary because they found no evidence. But they aren't credible now because it doesn't help them knock off a Judge they do not want on the SC.

Is that what you read on Breitbart?

Bull Investigation --- 'Sham'

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member