Heisenbeans
Well-Known Member
Dont even quote me son. Your a clown. Not even worthy of a fruitful argument.So cobs destroy cmh....
So many claims so few agree, what a tool to still be pushing his wares here
Dont even quote me son. Your a clown. Not even worthy of a fruitful argument.So cobs destroy cmh....
So many claims so few agree, what a tool to still be pushing his wares here
You can't compare a unoptimised single light source foot print (and the light was clearly too close) with a one that suites your cob foot print, that isn't a fair test. Just like those who try to do the reverse with hps foot prints to bash cobs. I am not speculating to the degree cmh or cob is better, but the gap is nowhere near as much as you are making out.It would have taken 3 315s to cover the area. Still more wattage than the 750 of cobbs. But the comparison was a 1000w double ended cmh vs 750 watts of cobbs. The cobs held there own in every aspect and was proof that side by side they could easily outperform
Watt for watt no way in hell a cmh could touch cobbs. I could up the drivers to 1750Ma or even 2100 and they would knock the dicks off 4 cmh bulbs over the same space at an equal wattage.
I didn't say I found anything new, as I clearly pointed out by saying ''most people already agree''. Are you openly stating that a high W single light source does not increase the compromise between intensity and plant health?, why else are smaller units better? (in the context of a home grower). Since you did openly state that, it contradicts the first half of your sentence. But well, it's kingrow, you are always full of contradictions and misinterpretations, then you run when questioned about it. I'm beginning to think you have a mental problem, hopefully not.You havent found anything we dont already know here and yes we can run high wattage cmh or hps without fucking the tops of our plants.
Moaning bitching exscuses again
Most seem to justify their last purchase. I say "to each their own."40 pages in . . . Who is the winner?!?!?!
I already did the test with 2 diuble ended 315s and the cobs killed em. That's the reason I went up to 1000w cmh.You can't compare a unoptimised single light source foot print (and the light was clearly too close) with a one that suites your cob foot print, that isn't a fair test. Just like those who try to do the reverse with hps foot prints to bash cobs. I am not speculating to the degree cmh or cob is better, but the gap is nowhere near as much as you are making out.
Maybe try the test again with 2x 315's and a canopy dimension that suites it, you won't be near as disappointed. I get the feeling the problem is you are trying to force a square peg through a round hole.
I didn't say I found anything new, as I clearly pointed out by saying ''most people already agree''. Are you openly stating that a high W single light source does not increase the compromise between intensity and plant health?, why else are smaller units better? (in the context of a home grower). Since you did openly state that, it contradicts the first half of your sentence. But well, it's kingrow, you are always full of contradictions and misinterpretations, then you run when questioned about it. I'm beginning to think you have a mental problem, hopefully not.
True ThatPeople without led or cobs just cant grasp the fact that maybe HPS and cmh bulb technology is old news. They dont want to spend 1100 dollars on a setup so they have to convince themselves that the cheaper bulb setups are just as good.
Ask people who have all the setups being compared and they will tell you straight up.
No one goes to cobs and than goes back to HPS.
That kinggrow clown hasn't bought a LED setup in 5 years.
I got over 6 grand invested in cobs. Not because I like spending rediculous amounts of cash on nothing. It's because I have hps and cmh and the cobs just performed better so I keep.investing in cobs.True That
Just blew another 315 double ended cmh. The other ones just burned out to nothing. 1 Phillip's also.An impartial source: https://growace.com/blog/led-grow-lights-vs-ceramic-metal-halide-grow-lights-which-is-better/
Heisenbeans had bad luck with his CMH's, I read he blew a few bulbs out.
You are not gonna like em.I got a couple 1000w DE CMH on order, gonna try and replace a few of my DE HPS to see if they do better or the same and run cooler. Seems like the latest and best HID tech.
Can you elaborate?You are not gonna like em.
What brand ballast did you buy? Is blowing the bulbs your only issue? Yield? Quality?You are not gonna like em.
The 1000 hasn't blown. It's the nanolux double ended.What brand ballast did you buy? Is blowing the bulbs your only issue? Yield? Quality?
Yeah I had never heard of Growers House till recently. I was leary of that brand. Honestly I was leary of the Nanolux because I had so many fry with their 1000w DE HPS.The 1000 hasn't blown. It's the nanolux double ended.
The growers house 315s are the ones that's are blowing
Cause they aren't that bright. The hps is way brighter.Yeah I had never heard of Growers House till recently. I was leary of that brand. Honestly I was leary of the Nanolux because I had so many fry with their 1000w DE HPS.
So why will I not be liking them?