Ayn Rand No Longer Has Script Approval

Wavels

Well-Known Member
Here is an interesting story about the many attempts to make a movie based on novel Atlas Shrugged



BACK in the 1970s Albert S. Ruddy, the producer of “The Godfather,” first approached Ayn Rand to make a movie of her novel “Atlas Shrugged.” But Rand, who had fled the Soviet Union and gone on to inspire capitalists and egoists everywhere, worried aloud, apparently in all seriousness, that the Soviets might try to take over Paramount to block the project.
“I told her, ‘The Russians aren’t that desperate to wreck your book,’ ” Mr. Ruddy recalled in a recent interview.
Rand’s paranoia, as Mr. Ruddy remembers it, seems laughable. But perhaps it was merely misplaced. For so many people have tried and failed to turn the book she considered her masterpiece into a movie that it could easily strike a suspicious person as evidence of a nefarious collectivist conspiracy. Or at least of Hollywood’s mediocrity.
Of course Rand herself had a hand in blocking some of those attempts before she died in 1982. Her heirs in the Objectivist school of thought helped sink some others. And plans for at least a couple of television mini-series fell to the vicissitudes of network politics and media mergers.
But Rand’s grand polemical novel keeps selling, and her admirers in Hollywood keep trying, and the latest effort involves a lineup of heavy hitters, starting with Angelina Jolie. Randall Wallace, who wrote “Braveheart” and “We Were Soldiers,” is working on compressing the nearly 1,200-page book into a conventional two-hour screenplay. Howard and Karen Baldwin, the husband-and-wife producers of “Ray,” are overseeing the project, and Lions Gate Entertainment is footing the bill.
Whether Ms. Jolie, who has called herself something of a Rand fan, will bring the novel’s heroine, Dagny Taggart, to life on screen, or merely wind up on a list with other actresses who sought or were sought for the role — including Barbara Stanwyck, Faye Dunaway, Raquel Welch, Farrah Fawcett and Sharon Stone — remains to be seen. Until now, at least, no one in Hollywood has figured out a formula that promises both to sell popcorn and to do justice to the original text, let alone to the philosophy that it hammers home endlessly, at times in lengthy speeches. (The final one is 60 pages long.)
But Mr. Baldwin said he believed that Mr. Wallace and the rest of their team were up to the task. “We all believe in the book, and will be true to the book,” he said.
Easier said than done. Published in 1957 and set in the near future, “Atlas Shrugged” plots the collapse of American society after thinkers, industrialists, scientists, artists and other innovators — Rand’s kind of people — go on strike and disappear, refusing to contribute to a collectivist world. Dagny, a railroad heiress, tries to save the country from starvation and total collapse, while falling in love with the mysterious John Galt, who she later learns was the man who started the strike. The novel ends after an apocalypse.
During Rand’s lifetime, her Objectivism, which celebrates rational self-interest and capitalism, was widely dismissed by academia and disparaged by both the political right and left. The reviews for “Atlas Shrugged” were not much kinder. “It howls in the reader’s ear and beats him about the head in order to secure his attention,” Granville Hicks wrote in The New York Times, “and then, when it has him subdued, harangues him for page upon page. It has only two moods, the melodramatic and the didactic, and in both it knows no bounds.”
Yet “Atlas” was a best seller. Six million copies have been sold over the years, and it remains a popular title, particularly among college students, according to Penguin Group, its publisher. Many of those copies wind up on shelves on Wall Street, where the book has been affectionately referred to as “the Bible of selfishness.”
Hollywood took notice of the novel’s popularity from the start, but Rand refused to consider movie offers: she had been burned, she felt, by the experience of turning her earlier (and, at 720 pages, comparatively short) novel, “The Fountainhead,” into the 1949 film starring Gary Cooper and Patricia Neal.
Rand had adapted it herself, but she battled with the director, King Vidor, over changes to her screenplay. In the end a single line was cut from a six-minute speech by Cooper’s character, Howard Roark, reportedly leaving Rand embittered by the experience. She vowed that Warner Brothers would not be permitted to adapt “Atlas” unless the studio recut “The Fountainhead,” returning the edited line to its rightful place, said her biographer Jeff Britting.
In 1972, 15 years after the novel’s publication, Mr. Ruddy, fresh from producing “The Godfather,” decided to make a run at Rand, who was already in her late 60s. “ ‘Atlas Shrugged,’ let’s face it, was probably the most important novel of the 20th century that was never a film,” he said.
Rand’s agents warned him to expect rejection, he said, but reluctantly set up an appointment. He recalled meeting her in a room with one small love seat and many empty chairs. Mr. Ruddy, 6-foot-4, squeezed in next to the petite aging writer on the small couch and commenced to woo her.
“I knew from ‘Atlas Shrugged’ that she dug men, that she was a lusty woman,” he recalled in a telephone interview. “We start talking. It’s instant love.” Before long, he said, Rand was telling him, in her heavy accent, “I want you to do ‘Atlas Shrugged.’ ”
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
Mr. Ruddy said he warned Rand that it was not her ideas that interested him. “Forget philosophy,” he said. “The abstract of the story is quite lovely: the power and the sustainability of the great individual, of the creative person, of the entrepreneur.” Rand, he said, “thought that was brilliant, because that’s how she saw her book,” as a story first.

Mr. Ruddy said he looked past most of her eccentricities; she insisted on flying only by private plane, for example, because she feared that “if the Russians found out that she was on a commercial airliner, they’d hijack it,” he said.
But Mr. Ruddy refused to grant Rand final script approval, and their courtship quickly broke off. “It’s a fool’s game to spend a lot of money and time only to have her say, ‘I think you should take this out,’ ” he said. So, he recalled, he told Rand that he would wait for her to “drop dead” and then make the movie on his own terms.
With Mr. Ruddy out of the picture, Rand began fielding new offers from movie and television producers. In 1978 Henry Jaffe and his son Michael negotiated a deal for an eight-hour mini-series on NBC. Michael Jaffe, now a partner at Jaffe/Braunstein Films, obtained script approval for Rand, and they hired Sterling Silliphant, the screenwriter of the Sidney Poitier movie “In the Heat of the Night,” to adapt “Atlas Shrugged.” Rand was unsatisfied with his script; she called Mr. Silliphant’s writing too “naturalistic” and drew a line at his insertion of the word “just” into a single line of dialogue. (Mr. Jaffe, in an interview, took up Rand’s defense: “It made the sentence become ambiguous,” he said. “Her characters didn’t say ambiguous things.”)
Yet it was a regime change at NBC — specifically Fred Silverman’s ascension to the network presidency — that killed the project in 1979. The network suddenly viewed “Atlas Shrugged” as too burdened with philosophy, its characters as too black-and-white, its subject too ponderous.
At the end of her life Rand tried to write her own script, as she had done for “The Fountainhead,” but she died with only a third of her hoped-for mini-series finished.
Rand left her estate to a longtime student, Leonard Peikoff, who eventually sold an option to Michael Jaffe and Ed Snider, a friend of Rand’s who owned the Philadelphia Flyers hockey team. But Mr. Peikoff refused to approve the script they developed. “Leonard had huge problems with it,” Mr. Jaffe said. “He wasn’t Ayn. But he wanted to exercise her control.”
Other producers came and went, and in 1992 a New Jersey investor and Objectivist, John Aglialoro, bought an option to make “Atlas Shrugged,” eventually paying Mr. Peikoff more than $1 million in exchange for full creative control.
Under Mr. Aglialoro’s sponsorship a succession of writers and producers developed at least four scripts. One writer was Mr. Peikoff’s ex-wife, Cynthia Peikoff, who had been Rand’s typist. Some of the scripts, she said, were too sci-fi, others reduced the novel’s characters to caricatures, and she was told that her own attempt was no better than “workmanlike.”
In 1999 Mr. Ruddy resurfaced, cutting a deal with TNT for a four-hour mini-series version. “A dream come true,” he called it at the time. But a threatened actors’ strike delayed production, and the project was dropped after AOL and Time Warner merged.
Then 9/11 worsened the climate for films with apocalyptic visions. “I could have stayed with it and kept pushing it,” Mr. Ruddy said. “But now people start jumping out of their seats when a building blows up.”
Mr. Ruddy’s exit opened the door to the Baldwins, who optioned the rights to “Atlas Shrugged” from Mr. Aglialoro while running the billionaire Phil Anschutz’s Crusader Entertainment. (Mr. Baldwin, oddly enough, had once been a ticket manager for Mr. Snider’s Flyers.) James V. Hart, who had written “Contact,” developed a draft of the first installment of a three-movie series, but the Baldwins could land neither stars nor financing.
There was also some thought that Mr. Anschutz, whose movies are often designed to accommodate a religiously devout audience, may have lost enthusiasm for the project when he learned that Rand was an outspoken atheist, but an Anschutz spokesman called this a misunderstanding. In any case, when the Baldwins left Crusader in 2004 to set up their own production company, they took the rights to “Atlas Shrugged” with them
Last spring in a twist that might have amused Rand and Mr. Anschutz, the latest deal for an “Atlas Shrugged” film project had its inception during Mass at the Church of the Good Shepherd, in Beverly Hills.
Mr. Baldwin said that a fellow parishioner, Michael Burns — the vice chairman of Lions Gate — approached Mr. Baldwin and his wife “right under the nose of the priest,” whispering to them about the rights to Rand’s novel and asking to “meet right away.”
Mr. Burns — who remembered the conversation taking place outside, after Mass — said he had first read “Atlas” in high school and has given as many as 100 copies as gifts over the years.
“I think it solidified my capitalistic thinking, in that I believe very strongly that people are generally selfish, but that selfishness can ultimately benefit many, many people,” Mr. Burns said.
The Baldwins used Mr. Hart’s script to interest Ms. Jolie in the project, through her manager, Geyer Kosinski. (Mr. Kosinski said Ms. Jolie declined to comment.) Together the Baldwins, Mr. Burns and Mr. Kosinski, who is also to be one of the producers, quickly approached Mr. Wallace about a new adaptation. And in what Mr. Wallace called an uncanny coincidence, he had recently read “Atlas” for the first time, when he and his college-age son had swapped their favorite books.
The challenge, Mr. Wallace said, was immediately tempting. As for how he is distilling Rand’s novel and its Castro-length monologues to a two-hour screenplay, Mr. Wallace insisted he had the material under control and was on course to deliver a finished draft this month.
“I can pretty much guarantee you that there won’t be a 30-page speech at the end of the movie,” he said. “I have two hours to try to express what Rand believed to an audience, and my responsibility is not only to Ayn Rand, but to the audience, that this be a compelling movie. More people will see the movie than will read ‘Atlas Shrugged.’ And the movie has to work.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/14/movies/14brow.html?pagewanted=2
 

medicineman

New Member
Easier said than done. Published in 1957 and set in the near future, “Atlas Shrugged” plots the collapse of American society after thinkers, industrialists, scientists, artists and other innovators — Rand’s kind of people — go on strike and disappear, refusing to contribute to a collectivist world. Dagny, a railroad heiress, tries to save the country from starvation and total collapse, while falling in love with the mysterious John Galt, who she later learns was the man who started the strike. The novel ends after an apocalypse.
So when are you guys goin on strike, please tell me it's true, just put all your money in the pot before you leave!
 

ViRedd

New Member
"So when are you guys goin on strike, please tell me it's true, just put all your money in the pot before you leave!"

There ya go, tryin' to abscond with the money again, Med. Don't be so greedy. :bigjoint:


Vi
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
Sounds like desperate wishful thinking.
Dare I ask why you think this could possibly be so?
Why is the book so consistently popular, as mentioned in article.
Seems to me the exact opposite is true.
 

ViRedd

New Member
Wavels ...

Ayn Rand isn't relevent. The Constitution isn't relevent. The Bible isn't relevent. Freedom isn't relevent. Liberty isn't relevent. Old moral and ethical standards of any kind aren't relevent.

See how easy it is to understand once its spelled out?

Yeah, I know ... I'm still trying to figure it out too. :bigjoint:

Vi
 

medicineman

New Member
Sounds like desperate wishful thinking.
Dare I ask why you think this could possibly be so?
Why is the book so consistently popular, as mentioned in article.
Seems to me the exact opposite is true. True to ruthless plutocratic greed mongers and sons of influence, but to the proletariate it is fighting words, We know what exploitation is, we have been there at the expense of exactly those types of individuals, you know, the ones that say, I've got mine, Fuck you, and proceed to do just that, fuck us! Please I'm trying to be nice!
 

Dankdude

Well-Known Member
Wavels ...

Ayn Rand isn't relevent. The Constitution isn't relevent. The Bible isn't relevent. Freedom isn't relevent. Liberty isn't relevent. Old moral and ethical standards of any kind aren't relevent.

See how easy it is to understand once its spelled out?

Yeah, I know ... I'm still trying to figure it out too. :bigjoint:

Vi
And you can thing the republicans for all of the above Vi.
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
Yes, Vi, the dodginess of the left:
Ayn Rand isn't relevent. The Constitution isn't relevent. The Bible isn't relevent. Freedom isn't relevent. Liberty isn't relevent. Old moral and ethical standards of any kind aren't relevent.
*lol* yup, bulls eye..... ! And it looks like logic is also no longer relevant...*lol*
 

ViRedd

New Member
Dank, the only thank we can "thing" the Republicans for ... at least this last Congress, is an expotential growth rate in the power of the federal government. Now THAT'S a "thank" we should be worried about. *lol*

Vi
 

Dankdude

Well-Known Member
Dank, the only thank we can "thing" the Republicans for ... at least this last Congress, is an expotential growth rate in the power of the federal government. Now THAT'S a "thank" we should be worried about. *lol*

Vi
And corruption, and taking away more rights from the people, need I keep going???
How about destroying a budget surplus?
I know one more thing, eroding the Constitution of the United States...
 

ViRedd

New Member
Dankster ...

All I can say is ... the newly elected, Democratic contolled congress had better watch its step. You're correct of course on the Republican spending ... and Bush's lack of a veto pen. The Reagan Democrats were responsible for breaking away from the Republicans and voting for the Dems. My worry is that the Pelosi - Ried cabal won't be able to stiffle their radical left wing urges ... and things will get even worse.

Vi
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
Yee haw! It's gonna be quite a show! Just look at the presidential hat throwing under way, Holy Cow, it's pretty early in the cycle! The behavior of the thus far, erratic Dems on the hill is gonna be detrimental to the Dem Pres Nominee!!!
Joe Lieberman is an interesting wild card, contingent upon future events in war on terror.
 

ViRedd

New Member
The election of Joe Lieberman was interesting ... where the Reagan Democrats abandoned the Republicans this election cycle, the right of center Republicans elected Lieberman. There has to be a message there somewhere. I think the message is ... left-wing extremists like Med and Dank are way in the minority as compared to moderate, sensible, middle of the roaders like you and me Wavels. *lol*

Vi
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
^^^^^*lol*

I wish Lieberman could convince the otherwise quite excellent Ron Paul to reconsider his position regarding US war on terror....oh well!
I admit it is only a pipe dream.....alas!
 

medicineman

New Member
^^^^^*lol*

I wish Lieberman could convince the otherwise quite excellent Ron Paul to reconsider his position regarding US war on terror....oh well!
I admit it is only a pipe dream.....alas!
Have you guys ever watched Lieberman, That guy is an evil worm, he makes my skin crawl. The guy lost the democratic primary and was elected to independant by republicans, what a moral less asshole.That shows the idiocy of the voting public. The asshole says he'll quorum with the democrats and talks Republican, what a whiny two faced bitch!
 

ViRedd

New Member
"what a moral less asshole.That shows the idiocy of the voting public."

On the contrary, Med. It shows that Lieberman doesn't have flexable principles.

Vi
 
Top