True the comparison is loose, at best, but at what point does one give up comparing two plants of the same strain? I'd imagine it's worth comparing the same strain from different breeders? Maybe not? Do you draw the line at Auto vs. Photo of the same strain since the Auto is technically a hybrid?
How different will an Auto version be compared to the Photo?
It's an interesting question to consider and I hadn't thought of it until now - we have all these seed banks giving us a strain name with the option for Auto or Photo so it conditions us (or me) to believe that the outcomes will be very similar, if not the same, with just different growing durations and/or yields...but how accurate is that expectation?