Auto cross

raymont

Well-Known Member
I had an auto that got impregnated by my 707 Headband. standard not auto . What can I expect?
 

MrToad69

Well-Known Member
Raymont..
Unfortunately, you wont get any Autos from this round of offspring..You need to plant a bunch of the resulting beans from the auto x photo cross you get this round and breed it out for a second generation..At that point..approximately 25% will have the recessive auto trait show.

Toad
 

Frank Nitty

Well-Known Member
Raymont..
Unfortunately, you wont get any Autos from this round of offspring..You need to plant a bunch of the resulting beans from the auto x photo cross you get this round and breed it out for a second generation..At that point..approximately 25% will have the recessive auto trait show.

Toad
Even with CS???
 

MrToad69

Well-Known Member
Frank/Matt...
Once this photo x auto cross produces beans there are all sort of options..for the next generation...f2's

Photo dependency for example might be represented as either a PP or Pp genotype..both of which will show as a photoperiod plant as a phenotype as photo plants are dominant..

Assuming were all using seeds from reputable breeder..It's 99.9% certain their are no auto genes (ruderalis) mixed inso the photo is PP..once you breed the photo with an auto...pp..All offspring are going to be Pp..meaning all will have both photo as well as auto genes mixed in...If you breed f2's from these seeds...doing a large cross section of both...even feminizing...You should still have approximately 25% autos..regs or fems depending on how you have pollenated..

I almost 100% sure there is no sexual predisposition with respect to using feminized pollen and auto/vs photo outcome.

but to reiterate..you will not get any autos in the first generation from a photo x auto cross...

Toad
 

MATTYMATT726

Well-Known Member
Frank/Matt...
Once this photo x auto cross produces beans there are all sort of options..for the next generation...f2's

Photo dependency for example might be represented as either a PP or Pp genotype..both of which will show as a photoperiod plant as a phenotype as photo plants are dominant..

Assuming were all using seeds from reputable breeder..It's 99.9% certain their are no auto genes (ruderalis) mixed inso the photo is PP..once you breed the photo with an auto...pp..All offspring are going to be Pp..meaning all will have both photo as well as auto genes mixed in...If you breed f2's from these seeds...doing a large cross section of both...even feminizing...You should still have approximately 25% autos..regs or fems depending on how you have pollenated..

I almost 100% sure there is no sexual predisposition with respect to using feminized pollen and auto/vs photo outcome.

but to reiterate..you will not get any autos in the first generation from a photo x auto cross...

Toad
I know that's how it works with autox photo sexing, but sure that everyone that s1 their autos gets females.
 

raymont

Well-Known Member
So I popped it. It looks weird. The plant looks nitrogen starved. Will be adding nutes soon. Hopefully it will adjust things. Want to see if I get lucky..
 
Top