Affordable?

londonfog said:
what you fail to realize is that Rob Roy's experiment would do just what we are saying...or do you realize it, but don't get give a fuck anyway.
Click to expand...

You're wrong, that is if peace is your goal. Logic insists that is so.

The way to create peace is not by allowing one entity to initiate force against an indifferent person. The act of initiating the force negates any possibility of peace. That is self evident. Do you put gasoline on a fire hoping it will go out?

You might also learn the difference between actionable harm and indifference.
 
UncleBuck said:
do they believe in sister fucking or women drinking while expecting?
Click to expand...

I believe you have the right to shit on your own floor, but not the floor of another person that wishes you wouldn't.
Mind you, I'm not endorsing floor shitting, but I do endorse your right to participate in it on your own property.

If your sister still wants you to be your lover after knowing your fecal propensities, that's between you two.
 
Last edited:
UncleBuck said:
and if you open a store that serves the public, you have their permission regardless of skin color.

why does this make you so upset?
Click to expand...


You're getting closer, but of course you don't realize that.

How did property that was once held as private property, become a different kind of property ? Which actions caused that?
Did the property owners give their permission to coercive government to change the nature of their ownership to a pseudo ownership of sorts?
 
UncleBuck said:
loaded question. no need to answer questions that presuppose like that. any intellectual person would understand that and not make that fallacy.

i think you should define consent, since you seem to think kids can consent to pedophilia.
Click to expand...


Okay. Consent of the individual requires an uncoerced (no duress) acceptance of a willful agreement.

I'd add that others cannot provide consent for an individual unless that individual has left prior consent to a future action.

Kids can consent to shitting on floors or did somebody force you to do it?
 
Rob Roy said:
You're getting closer, but of course you don't realize that.

How did property that was once held as private property, become a different kind of property ? Which actions caused that?
Did the property owners give their permission to coercive government to change the nature of their ownership to a pseudo ownership of sorts?
Click to expand...
have you ever thought of moving and starting your own country ? to live and get along in this one, you must follow some rules.
 
londonfog said:
have you ever thought of moving and starting your own country ? to live and get along in this one, you must follow some rules.
Click to expand...

I think the most important rule regardless of where a person lives is to respect other people and their justly acquired property.

Rules that go against that, I have little tolerance for. How about you ? Do you agree with me or will you dance away in a cloud of laundry powder?

Rules ? Prohibitionist much ?
 
Last edited:
londonfog said:
why do you fight for segregation.
Click to expand...

You miss the obvious on a regular basis. He's not "fighting for segregation" anymore than he's fighting for forced integration.

He's affirming that using force to make people associate is the same thing as using force to keep them separate.

Those choices of how or if two people will associate, should always belong to the individuals involved, not other people, Mr. Nanny State follow the rules and return the slaves to their masters Laundry Folder Guy.
 
ChesusRice said:
According to your non aggression principle
There is nothing wrong with letting your 3 year old child starve to death as long as you dont prevent the child from obtaining food
It would be wrong however for others to trespass on your land trying to give the kid you are starving to death a piece of bread.
Click to expand...


Not quite. The non initiation of aggression principle forbids initiating aggression against others. It doesn't forbid caring for your children does it? Just because a person could do something, doesn't mean they should do something does it?

Obama could blow up children in foreign lands in your world that doesn't mean he....oh shit...
 
Rob Roy said:
I think the most important rule regardless of where a person lives is to respect other people and their justly acquired property.

Rules that go against that, I have little tolerance for. How about you ? Do you agree with me or will you dance away in a cloud of laundry powder?

Rules ? Prohibitionist much ?
Click to expand...
you once again failed to answer the question. Let's try it this way. Name ONE place that you think you can live in the way you suggest. America was established long before Rob Roy, so name me one place. Come on I'm sure you can do it.
 
londonfog said:
you once again failed to answer the question. Let's try it this way. Name ONE place that you think you can live in the way you suggest. America was established long before Rob Roy, so name me one place. Come on I'm sure you can do it.
Click to expand...
antarcz.gif
 
nitro harley said:
Chesus.

I am not sure what that is? Isn't that the word that you and buck used to justify calling my daughter and son in law a racist name I have never heard before?
Click to expand...

A mud shark is any white girl who, due to peculiarities in her psyche, dates only black men. There are two distinct types of mud sharks:

Type I Mud Sharks (the most common) are fat girls with little or no education who, rather than dating a white guy from the bottom of the heap, go for a mid range or low-end black man.

Type II Mud Sharks (less common) are good-looking girls (usually blonde) who are trying to make a statement by dating a black man. Usually type II's are trying to make daddy mad.
Man, yo' mamma's so ugly she could be a type I mud shark. How's your brother Tyrone doing?
 
ChesusRice said:
A mud shark is any white girl who, due to peculiarities in her psyche, dates only black men. There are two distinct types of mud sharks:

Type I Mud Sharks (the most common) are fat girls with little or no education who, rather than dating a white guy from the bottom of the heap, go for a mid range or low-end black man.

Type II Mud Sharks (less common) are good-looking girls (usually blonde) who are trying to make a statement by dating a black man. Usually type II's are trying to make daddy mad.
Man, yo' mamma's so ugly she could be a type I mud shark. How's your brother Tyrone doing?
Click to expand...

Chesus.

You are pretty narrow minded to think that way. You really have that kind of time on your hands to think up that shit?
 
londonfog said:
have you ever thought of moving and starting your own country ? to live and get along in this one, you must follow some rules.
Click to expand...
Always the last resort of those who cannot provide effective counter to the argument.
"If'n you don't like it git out!!"
 
ChesusRice said:
A mud shark is any white girl who, due to peculiarities in her psyche, dates only black men. There are two distinct types of mud sharks:

Type I Mud Sharks (the most common) are fat girls with little or no education who, rather than dating a white guy from the bottom of the heap, go for a mid range or low-end black man.

Type II Mud Sharks (less common) are good-looking girls (usually blonde) who are trying to make a statement by dating a black man. Usually type II's are trying to make daddy mad.
Man, yo' mamma's so ugly she could be a type I mud shark. How's your brother Tyrone doing?
Click to expand...
Pay more attention Cheesy.
You are giving the definition for mudshark, the word in contention here is mudscuttle.


mudscuttle
A White American who seems intent upon single-handedly making reparations for every wrong Black Americans have suffered at the hands of the White Man. The keynote characteristic of the mudscuttle is that he will reflexively ascribe nobility of character to Black folk. The mudscuttle imagines his behavior indicative of enlightened sophistication, when the behavior is instead a sinister form of prejudice in which bigotry has been replaced with intransigent advocacy. A mudscuttle boss will brazenly assign choice assignments to Blacks and turn a deaf ear to the most rational requests from Whites for parity in the workplace. It is typical of the mudscuttle to express nauseating levels of adoration for famous Black people, wildly disproportionate to actual accomplishment.

I'll never get promoted! My mudscuttle boss gave the last three promotions to Shaniqua, DeMontross and M'Kell!

You could probably characterize UB as a Mudscuttle, but he only does it for the kicks, in reality he hates blacks and anyone that isn't white. All Stormfront Veterans are like that.
 
londonfog said:
you once again failed to answer the question. Let's try it this way. Name ONE place that you think you can live in the way you suggest. America was established long before Rob Roy, so name me one place. Come on I'm sure you can do it.
Click to expand...

I hate to break the news to you, but our original debated point was concerning your non belief that your government was all about force. I also invited you to give me one thing you liked that they did that didn't involve force or the threat of it. You couldn't.

If you are going to continue to provide evidence against your own original argument, I'll just sit back and smoke this fattie.

After you've roasted in your juices for awhile, day or two, maybe I'll come back and dismantle your latest proclamation of error.
 
Rob Roy said:
I hate to break the news to you, but our original debated point was concerning your non belief that your government was all about force. I also invited you to give me one thing you liked that they did that didn't involve force or the threat of it. You couldn't.

If you are going to continue to provide evidence against your own original argument, I'll just sit back and smoke this fattie.

After you've roasted in your juices for awhile, day or two, maybe I'll come back and dismantle your latest proclamation of error.
Click to expand...
you can never answer that question can you ?You screaming force...I am not. If you are being forced,why do you stay ? AGAIN name one pace where you can live the DREAM that you so desire. Just one place. Name it.
Here is your chance to shine.
 
NoDrama said:
Always the last resort of those who cannot provide effective counter to the argument.
"If'n you don't like it git out!!"
Click to expand...

I'll probably let him simmer for awhile and then take THAT argument apart too. Maybe if I wait a day or two, he'll argue his way into another position he can't back up with any coherence.
 
londonfog said:
you can never answer that question can you ?You screaming force...I am not. If you are being forced,why do you stay ? AGAIN name one pace where you can live the DREAM that you so desire. Just one place. Name it.
Here is your chance to shine.
Click to expand...

Patience grass hopper, I'm keeping you in suspense for awhile. These things must be savored.

Come up with a third point of view on whether your government is force yet? You've already expressed two opposing points of view, can you score a hat trick on your floppery? Here is your chance to shine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

MarsHydrofactory
Grow Tent Kits Buying Guide: Read This Before You Get Into Traps!
Replies
0
Views
1K
MarsHydrofactory
MarsHydrofactory
Plutonium
Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection
2
Replies
25
Views
2K
schuylaar
S
hanimmal
AP FACT CHECK: Trump’s falsehoods on virus, taxes and Bidens
Replies
6
Views
492
Herb & Suds
Herb & Suds
LEDTonic - Max
LEDTonic's Journey & LED Grow Lights
Replies
3
Views
401
LEDTonic - Max
LEDTonic - Max
Fogdog
Examples of Democratic Party leadership
85 86 87
Replies
2K
Views
107K
AKDrifter
AKDrifter
Back
Top