I dont think you get why people dont "believe" it. Its quite loose on the whole "science" aspect of it.Yes I did but apparently other people didn't believe the information that was already on this thread so I had to rewrite it.
I dont think you get why people dont "believe" it. Its quite loose on the whole "science" aspect of it.Yes I did but apparently other people didn't believe the information that was already on this thread so I had to rewrite it.
All I can say at this point is try it for your self.I dont think you get why people dont "believe" it. Its quite loose on the whole "science" aspect of it.
Look at it this way, if over future millennia the O2 levels on earth drop, its not hard to fathom humans may evolve to develop greater lung capacities. But if you dropped O2 levels tomorrow humans would not instantly adapt. It takes time and reproduction to evolve. As such I feel this information might be more pertinent to breeders of cannabis vs your typical grower. But how UV light can be implemented into breeding regimes is far beyond my scope of knowledge.I would ad, with no scientific merit that hash making regions tend to be higher in uv rays. Obviously we know where hash comes from. So I would agree with an earlier statement that genetics is primary and I believe that UV is a pontentiator. Only based on basic theory and circumstantial commonalities.
I would be curious as to how big a placebo effect would be taking place though... assuming you arent actually having it lab tested.All I can say at this point is try it for your self.
All you would have to do is ask the people who are saying otherwise to show their lab results. If none are being shown then you may most likely be correct. I say may because someone could produce lab results, but i doubt it.If it were "scientifically proven" the word "does" would be used instead of "may". No?
I should note Im not saying that UVB doesnt have any impact. Im just questioning the degree of impact it has and whether or not that degree makes it worth adding UVB light or not.
I would love to be proven wrong here and in epic fashion, I doubt that will happen. But really Id be happy with any data on the subject. If I were contemplating putting UVB in a grow I would rent the article I posted earlier in this thread to try to get some hard data points from it, but Im not.All you would have to do is ask the people who are saying otherwise to show their lab results. If none are being shown then you may most likely be correct. I say may because someone could produce lab results, but i doubt it.
Similar locale we share... (yoda voice) lolI really want to do an outdoor grow , I live at over 6500 ft altitude, the US Olympic training center is less than a mile from my house , the amount of UV I get on a regular basis is insane , generally UV levels are above 10 and sometimes push upwards of 16.
IF I decide to spend the money on a lab test I will try to do a side by side, no promises but I am scientifically minded and like proving people wrong. Call it a hobby.I would love to be proven wrong here and in epic fashion, I doubt that will happen. But really Id be happy with any data on the subject. If I were contemplating putting UVB in a grow I would rent the article I posted earlier in this thread to try to get some hard data points from it, but Im not.
I have heard 5% increase. Which is substantial. But only one way to know foe sure.somebody reputable here, cant remember who, said they were testing + a few % on thc with uvb.
cant remember who? maybe @captainmorgan ?
I have a friend that lives NW of Canon City in the mountains and would love to teach him and see what he could produce up there.I really want to do an outdoor grow , I live at over 6500 ft altitude, the US Olympic training center is less than a mile from my house , the amount of UV I get on a regular basis is insane , generally UV levels are above 10 and sometimes push upwards of 16.
They get some real good crops there, front range lyfeI have a friend that lives NW of Canon City in the mountains and would love to teach him and see what he could produce up there.
It was indeed @captainmorgansomebody reputable here, cant remember who, said they were testing + a few % on thc with uvb.
cant remember who? maybe @captainmorgan ?
Didn't he say he was going to stop using it? Pretty sure you know he said that. And @CobKits was there when he said that too. Unless I'm way out there and he never said that.It was indeed @captainmorgan
give me a bit...I will find a full versionI would love to be proven wrong here and in epic fashion, I doubt that will happen. But really Id be happy with any data on the subject. If I were contemplating putting UVB in a grow I would rent the article I posted earlier in this thread to try to get some hard data points from it, but Im not.
That's a nice write up. Post your source?I found this which was interesting as it shows a trade off in weight for THC %
"What Is UV Light?
At this point you might be asking, "how is UV light different from normal light?" Even though humans can't see it, a good way to think of UV is to visualize a rainbow and pretend there is an extra color band past the blue and purple. All light is basically just waves of energy, and UV light is just like any other form of radiation. These waves wash over your plants at different frequencies (how many waves pass per second). UV light has a smaller gap between each wave than visible light, which means more waves are passing per second. This gives UV high energy, making it more like an X-ray than a radio wave.
How Does UV Light Effect Marijuana Plants?
But what does all this mean to your cannabis garden? To answer that, we need to investigate how UV light affects plants cells. Ultra-violet radiation, particularly UVB, has been shown to be detrimental to plant cell function. UV causes damage to plant cells in the same way it tears through your skin, eventually causing sunburn. As a result of this damage, all plants have created defenses against UV in the form of gene UVR8.
UVR8 is a protein molecule which senses UV all by itself, and then "tells" plant cells to change their behavior. Exactly how UVR8 molecules sense UV was recently discovered and is pretty interesting. UVR8 is what chemists call a "dimer." which just means that it's made of two structurally similar protein subunits. When UV light hits the two protein subunits in UVR8, their charge weakens and they break apart. To help visualize this, imagine rubbing two balloons against one another. The balloons will stick together because of a static charge. Now imagine the balloons get rained on. The water takes the static charge with it and the two balloons fly apart. In this example, the balloons are the two protein subunits and the rain is UV light cascading down on the plant cell. After the protein subunits break apart, they head to the cell nucleus to deliver their information.
More UV Can Mean More THC
One of these changes caused by this information is very important in your cannabis garden. UV stress stimulates cannabis' production of chemicals via the phenylpropanoid pathway, specifically malonyl-CoA and phenylalanine. Why is this important? It's important because cannabis uses malonyl-CoA to make Olivtol, which it in turn uses to make THC. Now we can see the specific pathway which cannabis uses to increase potency when exposed to UV light.
UV light is already present in your garden, but it's being blocked by the special glass your bulb is made of. Lamp manufacturers must use this type of glass by law because UV light can cause skin cancer when humans are overexposed. You wouldn't want everyone getting cancer from street lights would you? You can increase the amount of UV getting to your cannabis by mixing metal halide bulbs into your bloom room and leaving the glass off your air-cooled hoods. But a better and safer way is to buy and install cheap fluorescent UV lights.
Remember, UV light causes stress to the plant, so put the fluorescents on timers and only have them on for part of the light cycle. Having them on for fifteen minutes of every hour should do the trick. The only downside of this whole process is that yields go down slightly. The plant has to reroute resources and undergoes some physical damage from the UV. As long as you don't overdo the UV the increase in quality is well worth the decrease in yield."
it was here and was copy posted on another forums...looking...
but thats the problem...several of those posted "studies" show a variety of mechanisms and their supposed interactions with the environment etc.Cannabis is just another plant, I use a lot of the same techniques to grow my tomatoes and peppers as I use on my cannabis, it's just another plant. I do have some articles on cannabis if you would like me to paste them but they same basically what I just said and what that article I linked says. Just google UV-B on cannabis or UV-B on plants and you will find a wealth of knowledge.